LUCKY TO BE ALIVE Boy, 6, savaged by ‘loveable’ pet dog who ripped his face apart before being saved by his grandma

According to the animal shelter statistics, in 2017 around 1.5 million animals in shelters were euthanized. 670,000 dogs and 860,000 cats made up this staggering number, which amounted to almost 5,500 animals killed every

Look it up yourself

Now shut the fuck up about dogs hurting and killing people. 99 percent of all people are scum.

I guess you demand for the owners of "attack dogs" to also go to jail or prison, Seer777, when the attack dog(s) maul someone or kills them and the dog(s) is/are totally innocent. That is seriously messed up, man.

So now thread incidence on GLP is evidence to the contrary in regard to the very easily researchable statistic on this issue?

That doesn't even make sense. I'd stop now.

Do not forget that PETA murders by far the most cats and dogs on Earth. So when PETA members steals any animals, mostly cats and dogs, the animal will undoubtedly be cruelly and ruthlessly exterminated.

"Seeing as this is the very first pitbull harming or killing anyone type of thread in many months"


Here you go dumbass. They haven't posted August yet. Sorry if you think GLP is the Pit Bull attack reporting center.
[link to www.dogsbite.org (secure)]

I love these feel good stories.

And these are the reported ones let alone the thousands not reported. They don't even report the Attacks on other animals, just Humans.

Be careful, you are dealing with a full blown tard! Use their logic, post a cute pic of an Alligator and Great White SHark playing in the ocean. They will then be confident in knowing that these animals are clearly peaceful creatures due to the hardcore evidence of a pic. Hopefully they will proceed to go play with them in the ocean. Plus, no shark attacks or alligator attacks have been posted on GLP in months so they must not happen.

Someone please answer me this question....

Why are human beings so violent, murderous and cruel ? Then so hypocritical about it. Acting like they’re civilized and advanced. No we’re not. We’re savages.

Sure it does, Seer777. What I said makes perfect sense. What I said was completely out of context. Mostly because I simply wanted to entrap you and I did.

Within context, Seer777, I have personally witnessed various children harassing and otherwise abusing perfectly good yard dogs back in my younger days. Teenagers and adults have also done this same BS to other dogs. Like with humans dogs can only take so much abuse before they snap and go all out to the best of their abilities maul or kill the one(s) who is or are abusing them.

Typically those same humans who abuse those yard dogs go after other humans for refusing to join in on the "abuse the dog(s) fun". Been there, done that multiple times on the receiving end. Then to make matters worse with enough abuses said previously good dogs become irreparably damaged mentally and emotionally. They eventually get to the point of attacking on sight and/or hearing someone. Little children typically are such dogs' first victims. Of course this automatically makes said dog(s) innocent of their crimes against Humanity. This also unfortunately means said dog(s) need to be euthanized because they are up to an extreme danger to everyone around them and even to themselves.

Overall, Seer777, the lesson here is the involved dogs in whatever attack or attacks they wind up in are almost always not their fault. Humans are naturally their own worst enemy and seeks out others to blame for themselves. Some dogs are born bad. Luckily for the most part such bad dogs are not that difficult to spot when you find them. You kill the bad dogs and unconditionally love and cherish the good dogs who will give you what you want the most -- unconditional love and companionship.

Currently, the only method of measuring aggression comes from a universally recognized temperament test database from the American Temperament Test Society. According to their studies, the Bearded Collie is the most aggressive dog breed. Other notables include the Dachshund, Chihuahua, Sharpei, Schnauzer, Bulldog, and Chow Chow.

You just happened to pick said article, which reinforces not only the stereotype, but your own biased views from an interaction as a child.

A 15-year study in the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association identified multiple factors to a fatal dog-bite attack – none having to do with breed. This includes:
• No able-bodied person being present to intervene
• The victim having no familiar relationship with the dog
• The dog owner failing to neuter/spay the dog
• A victim’s compromised ability, whether based on age or physical condition, to manage their interactions with the dog
• The owner keeping dog as resident dog rather than family pet
• The owner’s prior mismanagement of the dog
• The owner’s abuse or neglect of the dog

Four or more of these factors were present in 75.5 percent of the cases examined in the study.

I've seen big dogs gentle as anything, and little dogs they needed a punt.
I blame the person who raised the animal.

Funny. I am stupid for simply being correct. Figures as much coming from the likes of you, AC. Oh well. People like and such as yourself are some of the dangerous humans I have described before...

It's hard for me to answer that question for you. I don't know why you are that way? Maybe because you are a low IQ moron? I cut my grass today, played some games with the kids then got on this advanced system called a computer to see what others in the wold are doing. Feels pretty peaceful and advanced to me. lol

To what I pointed at and bolded, Sol-tari.



Exactly! I have met alot of good big dogs over the course of my lifetime. There are alot more mean little dogs than big dogs from my personal experiences. This is one of the reasons why I much prefer big dogs over small dogs.

Big dogs are often very adorable and some of the biggest attention whores and aggressive love-me doggies ever. Small dogs on the other hand typically are highly aggressive and as a direct result solicit that "punt" move you briefly described, Sol-tari.

Also very good post too, Sol-tari. Though I have come to rather dislike getting one's dog spayed or neutered. Especially if you intend on keeping said dog as a strict guard dog.

booo hooo hooo Tard. I'm much safer than a tard Pitt Bull owner that's for sure. Those people are low IQ morons that will risk the life of everybody around them just so they can virtue signal that they love a shit breed of dog.

You're blaming the kid due to something you personally witnessed one time or another. Mmmmmkay.

What about the babies? What did they do? Not much a 2 weeks old can do but sleep, shit and eat. Sneezing can trigger these dogs..and does.


You can make whatever excuse you want..no kid deserved to have their face bitten off or throat torn out because they were:

Riding their bike

Walking down the street

Waiting for the bus

Being cared for by a relative

or

Sitting in the living room and get up to get a snack, as was mentioned in the OP.

But these dogs are innocent. That 2 week old was lookin to pull its ears for sure.

HAHA right out of the Tard 101 playbook.

Myth #9: Pit bulls pass the American Temperament Test

In 1977, Alfons Ertel designed the American Temperament Test in hopes of creating a uniform temperament test for dogs. Of the 77 million plus dogs that populate the U.S. today,21 6,670 are tested per year (0.008% of all dogs).22 The temperament data published by the group is not based upon scientific random sampling of any dog breed. It seems it would be virtually impossible to develop such a reliable study, as the base population source group is unidentifiable.

Due to the temperament data being objectively statistically unreliable, it is also highly misleading. Pit bull advocates frequently use this misleading data to point to the breed's good temperament and to advocate against breed-specific laws ("Pit bulls pass the ATTS test more often than beagles!"). Yet anyone who has a minimal understanding of critical statistical analysis should be able to see that the ATTS "breed statistics" temperament data is essentially valueless.

The 12-minute test stimulates a casual walk through a park with a range of encounters. The test focuses on stability, shyness, aggressiveness and a few other factors. According to the group, the overall pass rate (the combination of all breeds) is 84%.23 Unlike the AKC's Canine Good Citizen test, no part of the ATTS test is performed without the dog owner present. It also fails to evaluate the most basic scenario that leads to aggression: How a dog reacts when it sees another dog.

[link to www.dogsbite.org (secure)]

Try again tards

Who cares? Who wants some smelly animal in their house? Any time I'm around someone who owns a dog I can smell it all over them. Gross.

Do you have a point? You responded to a thread about pitbulls with a video of a trained police dog of a different breed.

A little more reading for you morons. I don't believe for one second you will read it but itss good for the others to know how to handle Pitt Tards.



Blog Dispels 'ATTS' Myth Used as Arsenal by Pit Bull Advocates

The ATTS Hoax
Bloodhound mythDogsBite.org - Since August, The Truth About Pit Bulls blog has dispelled several myths disseminated by pit bull advocates to distort the truth about pit bulls, including the Bloodhound and Nanny dog myths. On New Years Day, the site released a post about the American Temperament Testing Society (ATTS). Though ATTS test result data is not based upon a scientific random sampling of any dog breed, pit bull advocates use the misleading data to support their cause.

The detailed post touches upon many aspects of the ATTS temperament test, including: The history of the test, the test requirements, what the test involves, how the test is evaluated, criticisms of the test, why it's junk science, and examples of pit bull owners who acknowledge the test's biases. In a nutshell, and as pointed out by the writers, evaluating these areas shows why a dog breed responsible for roughly 50% of all fatal attacks can score better than Lassie.

[link to blog.dogsbite.org (secure)]

Guns don't shoot people on their own.

Pitbulls are well known to randomly flip out and attack whatever is closest completely of their own accord.

Nice strawman.

I picked it because it happened 4 days ago. The point is 'incidence' and how often these dog do serious damage to children.

Not sure why you are attacking me like I am saying the breed should be eradicated. I didn't say that.

I said owners should be held responsible if their dog attacks a child and dependent on the breed 'assault with a deadly weapon' due to owner negligence is grounds for conviction for felonious assault with a deadly weapon.

Last Edited by Seer777 on 08/08/2020 03:55 PM

So the accepted standard (the test) is invalid due to... Someone disagreeing?

You're not going to find many puppies that instantly run and attack everything. Interactions with another dog are based, again, on how it is raised and socialised.

You can take the AKC (the group that decided to promote the slanted back in German Shepards which causes hip dysplasia as the accepted standard) and shove that quite deep.

Who would think a dog would react differently when under different people's control. My friends Shepard acts extremely defensively when under her control around unfamiliar males. When under my control, he does not.

I'll let you figure out why, I'm sure you can do it.

I'm of the opinion that the 500hp chargers and mustangs shouldn't be street legal. I've never seen a single responsible person drive one. Same thing with the Kawasaki crotch rockets.

Same can be said for pitbull owners. Never a responsible one. Their dogs are always perfect little angels until the walking ticking time bomb goes off on an unsuspecting innocent. Always happens, it's only a matter of time.

Pitbull owners like to cover up the faults of the breed, but the fact is they're all liars. These dogs typically have multiple incidents of aggression, snapping, stalking, etc that the owners sugar-coat with stupid shit like "the dog wasn't trained" or "the kid was antagonizing the dog" when really, these dogs are just born and bred opportunistic predators.

Read what I was responding to, you'll figure it out!

I believe in England they are outlawed. Why can't we do the same. And I'm freaking sick and tired of people saying what big babies, big mushes, etc., their Pitbull is. They are anatomically built to clamp and not let go.

Tards going to tard hard lol. I let you read this and try to figure it out on your own. I on the other hand am not sure you can do it at all lol.


Owners frequently claim: "It's not the breed's fault"

Pit bull owners frequently blame the "environment" after a pit bull mauls or kills a person. A participant in the Tufts study illustrates this clearly, "If you get some kid that has been beaten all his life, he's going to go out and be aggressive towards people."14 The intention is to assert that an aggressive pit bull must have been beaten or taught to attack by their owners instead of admitting to the genetic traits that define the breed (See: Why do people say that pit bulls "don't let go?")

Pit bull defenders frequently blame a victim's actions after an attack too. Examples include blaming a "sudden cough" or "being in a bouncy chair" as a trigger for a fatal mauling. Ledy VanKavage, a top lobbyist for pit bulls, even blamed a baby crying as a pretext.15 Pit bull fans say such actions sufficiently explain why the pit bull killed the person. These excuses, however, always fail to explain the disproportionate response by the dog to an otherwise harmless activity.

continue your education here
[link to www.dogsbite.org (secure)]

You seem to have problems correlating cause and effect.