Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,977 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,989,427
Pageviews Today: 2,936,152Threads Today: 802Posts Today: 16,612
11:52 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

If COVID Fatalities Were 90.2% Lower, How Would You Feel About Schools Reopening?

 
TrustNoOneKS
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 76946759
United States
08/11/2020 12:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
If COVID Fatalities Were 90.2% Lower, How Would You Feel About Schools Reopening?
So, another long read, but interesting in learning how reporting of Covid-19 deaths has significantly increased the numbers based on how they would have been reported pre-Covid-19.

If COVID Fatalities Were 90.2% Lower, How Would You Feel About Schools Reopening?

"Key Findings For Data Through July 12th

According to the CDC, 101 children age 0 to 14 have died from influenza, while 31 children have died from COVID-19.

No evidence exists to support the theory that children pose a threat to educational professionals in a school or classroom setting, but there is a great deal of evidence to support the safety of in-person education.

According to the CDC, 131,332 Americans have died from pneumonia and 121,374 from COVID-19 as of July 11th, 2020.

Had the CDC used its industry standard, Medical Examiners’ and Coroners’ Handbook on Death Registration and Fetal Death Reporting Revision 2003, as it has for all other causes of death for the last 17 years, the COVID-19 fatality count would be approximately 90.2% lower than it currently is.


Abstract
The CDC has instructed hospitals, medical examiners, coroners and physicians to collect and report COVID-19 data by significantly different standards than all other infectious diseases and causes of death.

These new and unnecessary guidelines were instituted by the CDC in private, and without open discussion among qualified professionals that are free from conflicts of interest.

These new and unnecessary guidelines were additionally instituted despite the existence of effective rules for data collection and reporting, successfully used by all hospitals, medical examiners, coroners, and physicians for more than 17 years.

. . .

Why Did the CDC Decide to Create Unique Reporting Rules for COVID-19 When Successful Reporting Rules Already Existed?

A double standard exists for how COVID-19 data is collected and reported versus all other infectious diseases and causes of death. Let’s examine three essential data categories; Fatalities, Cases & Hospitalizations for all infectious diseases because there are significant flaws in what constitutes a COVID-19 case, hospitalization and fatality.

On March 24th, the CDC decided to ignore universal data collection and reporting guidelines for fatalities in favor of adopting new guidelines unique to COVID-19. The guidelines the CDC decided against using have been used successfully since 2003.

After all, based upon the July 11th data from the CDC’s Provisional COVID-19 Death Counts by Sex, Age & State webpage, if COVID-19 is an epidemic (122,374 Fatalities), then shouldn’t pneumonia (131,372 Fatalities) also be an epidemic?

Fatality Data

It is important to note that COVID-19 data is collected and reported by a much different standard than all other infectious diseases and causes of death data. This unique standard for COVID-19 was used, despite the existence of guidelines that have been successfully used since 2003 for data collection across all infective, comorbid, and injurious situations.

. . .

The ability for medical examiners and coroners to register their best medical opinion was neutered by the March 24th NVSS guidelines.

“If an organ system failure (such as congestive heart failure, hepatic failure, renal failure, or respiratory failure) is listed as a cause of death, always report its etiology on the line(s) beneath it (for example, renal failure due to Type I diabetes mellitus or renal failure due to ethylene glycol poisoning).”

Based upon the 2003 CDC Handbook, Part I for COVID-19 fatalities should contain any comorbidities first. Under these guidelines, COVID-19 would only be listed as a cause of death in Part I if there were no comorbidities and therefore the fatality counts for COVID-19 would be much lower than they currently are.

Here is the comorbidity data we have compiled from the only 7 states currently publishing this data in a manner that can be analyzed statistically. Note that 90.2% of fatalities had at least 1 comorbidity and therefore these fatalities would not be counted as COVID-19 fatalities under the 2003 CDC Handbook, but instead are counted based upon the NVSS guidelines and CSTE position paper adopted by the CDC on March 24th and April 14th respectively."

[link to childrenshealthdefense.org (secure)] (Emphasis added)

There is a goldmine of information in this very long paper. I tried my best to include the most important information, but be aware that there is far more information than what I quoted above.
I Want To Believe
TrustNoOneKS  (OP)

User ID: 76946759
United States
08/11/2020 02:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If COVID Fatalities Were 90.2% Lower, How Would You Feel About Schools Reopening?
bmup 2
I Want To Believe
TrustNoOneKS  (OP)

User ID: 76946759
United States
08/11/2020 11:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If COVID Fatalities Were 90.2% Lower, How Would You Feel About Schools Reopening?
Not interesting enough?
I Want To Believe





GLP