Schumann resonance speculation, time speeding up?

LOVE this... thanks... WOW! Hang on for the ride!

Nice rip - I think that time is definately speeding up. Isn't it inflationary theory that the universe is expanding and not just expanding, but doing so at an accelerating pace. That also holds true for everything in the universe too.

i'm trying to wrap my mind around the idea
of there actually only being 16 hours in a
day, lol... thoughts?

Yepper, eeeeeehaa!! Yonder we go! The sooner the better!! Have No fear all is good in the end!

It is more like a compression of time.

If you look to the skies you will see unusual but awsome thing changing. Call it planetx or what you might but and end of this age is coming soon.

Look for the blue star in Sagettarius. Then put your head between your legs and kiss your ass goodbye.

Ah.. someone I believe has an odd understanding of schumann..

----------

This global electromagnetic resonance phenomenon is named after physicist Winfried Otto Schumann who predicted it mathematically in 1952. Schumann resonance occurs because the space between the surface of the Earth and the conductive ionosphere acts as a waveguide. The limited dimensions of the Earth cause this waveguide to act as a resonant cavity for electromagnetic waves in the ELF band. The cavity is naturally excited by energy from lightning strikes. Schumann resonance modes are observed in the power spectra of the natural electromagnetic background noise, as separate peaks at extremely low frequencies (ELF) around 7.8, 14.3, 20.8, 27.3 and 33.8 Hz.
...

Lightning discharges are considered as the primary natural source of Schumann resonances. Lightning channels behave like a huge antenna which radiates electromagnetic energy as impulsive signals at frequencies below about 100 kHz [15]. These signals are very weak, but the earth-ionosphere waveguide behaves like a resonator at ELF frequencies and amplifies the spectral signals from lightning at the resonance frequencies [15].

In an ideal cavity, the resonant frequency of the n-th mode fn is determined by the Earth radius a and the speed of light c [6].

f_{n} =frac{c}{2 pi a}sqrt{n(n+1)}

The real Earth-ionosphere waveguide is not a perfect electromagnetic cavity. Losses due to finite ionosphere electrical conductivity make the system resonate at lower frequencies than would be expected in an ideal case, and the observed peaks are wide. In addition there are a number of horizontal asymmetries – day-night transition, latitudinal changes in the Earth magnetic field, sudden ionospheric disturbances, polar cap absorption, etc. that complicate the Schumann resonance power spectra.
---------------


Note that last part. Note the parts that say that though it does go to 7.8, it goes to other values often.

Judgment Day: Dec 21, 2012
December 21, 2012 has been chosen by the Time Lords as flashpoint. This may actually occur at any time, but everyone will perceive it as December 21, 2012, with time being either sped up or slowed down for coordination between timelines. This will be a moment of virtually unlimited creative potential. The 4 Earths will merge, and everyone will be reunited with everyone else for an amazing party. All destination points (planets) will be “perfected” prior to distribution of the population according to the collective desires of the inhabitants. Everybody will get exactly what they want.

Heyyyy not bad ..not bad at all ..very good ..excellent ...i like it : )

Yesss time is speeding up ever faster. We are getting to a point of "some" answers LOL

Cheerios : )

Time relative to the past is always faster...
Of course come 2012 it will be flipping backwards(reversing) and starting over. And when time begins again it will be twice as fast as it was when it began last time.

Photon Belt = Galactic Timing Belt

Thread: schumann resonance not increasing!


schuman resonance is not increasing :)

Inertia is the phenomenon that a force is required to cause change of velocity. The amount of inertial mass of an object is measured by measuring how much force it takes to accelerate it. The symbol for inertial mass is m. It is inertia that sets the timescale of the universe. If inertia is decreasing we will get more distance traveled in one second by an object that experiences a force F. So from the perspective of someone not experiencing the inertia decrease, the folks experiencing the inertia decrease would appear to be moving faster. So maybe inertia is changing with time?

Time ticking. The Milky Way is moving at about 1000 km per second. Double that to estimate the solar system's speed around the center and double that for the spin and orbit of the Earth. That is 4,000 km/s (and a gross OVER estimate). Light travels at 300,000 km/s, so we're traveling relative to the Cosmic Microwave Background at about 1% of the speed of light.
The math/physics shows if I am on one planet and you are on another and we are traveling by each other at close to the speed of light then 1) I will see that you and your clocks have slowed down AND 2) you will see that me and my clocks have slowed down. At the same time.

So speed doesn't slow down our clocks, except to an outside observer. The Special Relativistic speed effect has NO effect on our own clocks or aging (unless one of us gets into a spaceship and zooms off, then looking back at us, she will think that we seem to have slowed down a bit).Yet, If EVERYTHING in the universe stopped moving it would mean time has stopped not speeded up. There will be no point of reference for which the speed of time to compare to, but this is only for the overall universe, the apparent time change will depend on where you are in the universe and what your looking at, for example objects which where fast moving away from you would have appeared to be traveling slowly through time, but now its not moving it would appear to be moving at the same speed as you are. The Earth's motion isn't anywhere near the speed of light. If it all stopped right now, you wouldn't notice the difference (in time, anyway).

Time runs "slower" in intense gravity. As the light leaves the gravity well, it is redshifted as it moves out into space where time "runs faster". If time is speeding up, would it have impact down to the subatomic level? Then again, redshift or blueshift is deceiving because the colors of the stars pass through dust, Nebulas, etc, etc, etc. Some scientists even thought a ridiculous thing: some stars were older than the universe. The measurement of even closer stars like Betelgeuse is an enigma giving dates from 300 to 1.000 light-years, a “mere” huge mistake of 700 light-years! Using simple trigonometry (parallax) to far away stars is even worst guessing.

If time speeds up uniformly in whole universe, we wouldn't even notice it, or be able to measure it. It would appear to us just the same. But time does not change uniformly everywhere in the whole universe, except at extremes like maybe A BLACK HOLE or a photon, as every frame of reference is it own time.

Consider light that goes twice faster than now. Now you take clock to measure it's speed. Clock also runs twice faster - result is the same. Hence the experiment with cesium clocks in planes flying from west to east and east to west, on the ground in Washington and the moon would say the clocks tick differently and being affected by different gravity. Yet, gravity also affects cesium! Now what happens if not all the cosmos is speeding up but just our galaxy being dragged by a black hole or wormhole to other galaxy? Then we would have a point of reference like balls floating on a swimming pool and intelligent bacteria dwelling in each one of them would realize somehow the movement of their balls was speeding up or getting closer to others (unaware there’s a big hole beneath the pool swallowing all the water) and then the acceleration within the SPIRAL of the whirlpool AT THE VERY COLLAPSE like water entering into the sink.

When looking back into the the very distant parts of the universe, which means simultaneously looking back in time to the origins of the universe, the change in the rate of time would cause the light from distant galaxies to undergo exactly the same redshift that is currently attributed to space expanding.

In other words, you could have a steady-state universe, which gives the appearance of an expanding universe, if time is "speeding up" over the life of the universe.

If the universe is steady-state, and time is speeding up, then instead of the universe expanding from a "point" 13 billion years ago, instead, 13 billion years ago time was standing still. It would cause the same record in the redshifts observed.

To give this "photonic" system of clocks and rulers a physical reality (i.e. physically consistent) you will have to make atomic masses grow exponentially with time, this will require an alternative theory of gravitation and cosmology. In the "photonic" way of measuring the universe distant stars are still red-shifted, although the effect is interpreted as a time dilation FX and not an expansion effect. It is this red-shift which resolves the paradox, as indeed it does in an open, infinite, universe in the standard theory.

Half million years after BB, electrons were measured to be 30% more massive than at present. While electron mass decreasing requires time to be slowing down of the life of the universe, correct??)
If the mass of atomic particles increases monotonically with cosmological time, then atomic clocks would 'speed up' "uniformly in the whole universe".

This would occur for example in a mass field theory such as Fred Hoyle's described in On the Origin of the Microwave background

The problem would be that we would not be able to notice this increase in clock rate unless there was another kind of clock to measure it against.

In SCC theory such a clock would have been provided by the photons in the microwave background. But: Wouldn’t it be impossible to see the CMB in a steady-state universe?? The CMB photons would be long gone, ... or ...?? As opposed to the expanding universe.
If the GR universe did collapse into a Big Crunch then the "photonic" system of measuring would still yield a static universe, but it would imply masses were now decreasing and rulers expanding etc. The problem would be that there would be no physical reason for masses to behave in this way.

However SCC was an attempt to modify GR and give a reason for such a variation of mass, - the inclusion of gravitational potential energy. The result was a static and closed universe. Yet The mass of our sun is decreasing as its field expands.

I’ve read the Schumann Resonance frequency of the Earth (pulse or heartbeat) has been rising over the past several years. It was measured at about 7.83 hertz (Hz) per second and has increased since 1980 to almost 12 or 13 hertz (Hz) per second. What felt like 24 hours feels more like 16-18 hours today. But what’s the source of this data?

[link to www.ncedc.org]

You’ll see even this link admitting there’s no change there was a “problem” with the calculations that was “solved”:

[link to www.ncedc.org]

It’s related to magnetic activity. I’ve read the Earth's gravity via its magnetic flux is changing .... speeding up. When the flux hits X then the pole shift could occur.


1) The north magnetic pole is not at the same location as the geographical north pole. It's about 11 degrees off and located in Northern Canada.

2) The question is - would the flux change if the magnetic pole were shifted to the geographical pole?

3) It might seem like the answer would be the flux would remain unchanged. However, it's not that simple.
It depends on the motions in the fluid outer core of the earth. The geomagnetic field is caused –they say- by convection of core fluid, producing a dynamo effect. If the motions were symmetric to the rotation axis, then the field would actually decay to zero in a few thousand years. This result is known as Cowling's Theorem - axisymmetric flows cannot maintain axisymmetric dynamo action.

[link to www.megakastro.gr]

Time is our perception of the rate of change. Without "change," "time" is irrelevant.
Imagine if nothing changed. Nothing changed location...on a quantum level, too...nothing moved, nothing changed. Time would "stop." We've all seen it done on TV shows like "Bewitched" where a spell is cast and everything "freezes" - time stops. No change (of location in space), no time. As the Theory of Relativity infers, time and space are indivisible.

Since time is our perception of the rate of change, that also makes time and mind indivisible. And since time and space are indivisible, that makes mind and space indivisible. Our minds are changing? More things are happening nowadays than in previous thousands of years. If more things are happening there are more multiple quick outcomes. Is there a physical experiment which can tell you what speed you are going in an inertial frame unless you assume some other inertial frame to be 'at rest'?

Here is more!

[link to www.angelfire.com]

I don't know but it sure does seem like everything is faster. The days are really short.