Ever Notice The Scarcity of ASIANS Among U.S. Protesters? PG 8 UPDATE: TOPIC SHIFT!

Their culture is based upon the sanctity of the FAMILY and how each family contributes to the whole of society... and that every family supports ITSELF to maintain that internalized structure.

It's this inherent culture that makes it shameful for them to accept government handouts and instead they rely upon their own hard work to succeed.

But, there's another underlying reason why they avoid minority groups and instead choose to live among themselves in their own segregated communities... communities that govern from within, where agitators that will disrupt the harmony are not tolerated.

More than any other on the planet, the Asians practice racial preservation. They strive to keep their bloodlines pure and as undiluted as possible and even today they consider interbreeding to be a social evil that will eventually reduce them down to a lower level. That's why you'll rarely see an Asian girl on a Black guy's arm... and virtually never on that of a Hispanic.

Post-WWII, Korea and Vietnam, entire Asian families were ripped apart as daughters were banished when GI's took them home as war brides and those rifts rarely healed over time. Those daughters -and their children- were forever outcast as unclean.

And, male offspring of those unions were especially shunned because it was rightfully believed they would only perpetuate those cultural dilutions. As odd as it may sound, one attribute used to measure how much racial impurity was present in an Asian man was his bodyhair! The more hirsute an Asian man was the more it was believed his natural "purity" had been compromised and they've been ridiculed for it for centuries, going all the way back to when virgins were raped by invading, hairy hoards. And, they still are today... it's one of those things that is taught by the elders, but never discussed openly beyond that!

And that's the primary reason why Asians will not generally associate with races other than Caucasians - the cultural losses are considered to be too great to risk. While they may benignly tolerate the strong impact Caucasians have had upon their culture, they will never fully accept or condone it.

You'd better hope we DON'T ever go to war with China because they are a fiercely protective -and rightfully proud- people of their ancient culture and when the chips are down, most of those 5.9 million Chinese-Americans will not be fighting on the side of their adopted nation.

Their culture is based upon the sanctity of the FAMILY and how each family contributes to the whole of society... and that every family supports ITSELF to maintain that internalized structure.

It's this inherent culture that makes it shameful for them to accept government handouts and instead they rely upon their own hard work to succeed.

But, there's another underlying reason why they avoid minority groups and instead choose to live among themselves in their own segregated communities... communities that govern from within, where agitators that will disrupt the harmony are not tolerated.

More than any other on the planet, the Asians practice racial preservation. They strive to keep their bloodlines pure and as undiluted as possible and even today they consider interbreeding to be a social evil that will eventually reduce them down to a lower level. That's why you'll rarely see an Asian girl on a Black guy's arm... and virtually never on that of a Hispanic.

Post-WWII, Korea and Vietnam, entire Asian families were ripped apart as daughters were banished when GI's took them home as war brides and those rifts rarely healed over time. Those daughters -and their children- were forever outcast as unclean.

And, male offspring of those unions were especially shunned because it was rightfully believed they would only perpetuate those cultural dilutions. As odd as it may sound, one attribute used to measure how much racial impurity was present in an Asian man was his bodyhair! The more hirsute an Asian man was the more it was believed his natural "purity" had been compromised and they've been ridiculed for it for centuries, going all the way back to when virgins were raped by invading, hairy hoards. And, they still are today... it's one of those things that is taught by the elders, but never discussed openly beyond that!

And that's the primary reason why Asians will not generally associate with races other than Caucasians - the cultural losses are considered to be too great to risk. While they may benignly tolerate the strong impact Caucasians have had upon their culture, they will never fully accept or condone it.

You'd better hope we DON'T ever go to war with China because they are a fiercely protective -and rightfully proud- people of their ancient culture and when the chips are down, most of those 5.9 million Chinese-Americans will not be fighting on the side of their adopted nation.

Bullshit. It's because there is no material reward to do so.

They have limited spiritual and moralistic ideals.

I'd like to thank everyone who's replied to my thread, respondents and readers alike. But now I'd like to take it to another, darker level and one I find deeply disturbing because current trends suggest it may become a grim reality as tensions mount in the South China Sea:

If the unthinkable should occur and we do find ourselves in a shooting war against China, what will the official U.S. policy be regarding the over 17-million Asian-Americans? As others have already pointed out, the term "Asian-American" itself is complex since it paints with a very broad brush that includes those who've become residents of the United States from China, India, Australia and all Pacific rim nations; and some maps extend that boundary to include Russia and deep into the Middle East, and many of those nations in the Pacific rim have already aligned themselves with the U.S. regarding the South China Sea. In total those nations easily comprise more half the Earth's populace. So this will become a true world war.

We've already witnessed the ham-handed approach the U.S. used in their treatment of Japanese-Americans following Pearl Harbor. So, will history repeat itself again as we round up American citizens -deeply loyal or otherwise- into internment centers? And if so, what will the measure of that loyalty be?

-Will it be an Oath that can easily be broken?
-Will official travel documents be issued that only allow them limited mobility or social activity?
-Will ID badges be required so they can be instantly recognized?
-Will they be simply forced into a form of house arrest or be fully rounded up into those legendary FEMA camps?

While all of these possibilities reek of the worst nightmares of outright Fascism they are valid questions all, since we've already seen how pervasively an invisible virus has altered our national mindset and deeply divided us into sometimes violent clashes over the mandated wearing of simple face masks. And in a case of declared war those divisions can/will make/break our nation as we start to see enemies of all kinds -both real and imagined- everywhere we look.

This would be a war totally unlike any other Americans have faced because -by default- it will occur right here at home in every neighborhood, in every town... not even the Civil War brought those coast-to-coast agonies.

And our great American melting-pot quickly boils over to scald everyone!

What say you?

I has been my personal observation, with many Asian friends, from studying martial arts since a teenager, that most Asians really dislike the Chinese.

My friends of Japanese, Vietnamese, Korean, Thai and Phillipino heritage despise the Chinese. "China is asshoe" is an understatement. In martial arts schools, you never see Chinese students in any of the MA schools teaching the Arts of another Asian culture.

I am certain someone, somewhere will try to point to an outlier. I do not doubt outliers exist, but I have never experienced one.

The only time I ever trained with Chinese practitioners was in Krav. I never trained Kung Fu, but would be surprised if the schools had Asian students other than Chinese.

ETA: What I am trying to say, in very simple terms, is that to group other Asians with Chinese will really piss them off.

Not unlike how white people feel when some idiot tries to claim we are all nazi because the nazis had fair skin -- 99.8% of white people despise the nazis, and our ancestors fought and died to stop them.

Many an ancestor of Asians, not Chinese, fought against the Chinese. The Chinese have quite a history of trying to expand their footprint.

I always respected asians

I'd like to thank everyone who's replied to my thread, respondents and readers alike. But now I'd like to take it to another, darker level and one I find deeply disturbing because current trends suggest it may become a grim reality as tensions mount in the South China Sea:

My friends of Japanese, Vietnamese, Korean, Thai and Phillipino heritage despise the Chinese. "China is asshoe" is an understatement. In martial arts schools, you never see Chinese students in any of the MA schools teaching the Arts of another Asian culture.

Thank you for that, Lady J!! It's actually encouraging to hear your personal experiences.

But if we should go to war, how do you think the feds will approach our own citizens via-a-vis their "loyalty"?? We don't exactly have a sterling historical track record there.

With over 17-million there is certain to be a percentage -however small it may be- that will oppose the United States in such a conflict... and we already have substantial populace that will take to the streets regardless.

As much as many current "protesters" are abusing their own Constitutional rights, I genuinely worry about how badly those same rights may be officially abused against innocents in a time of war. I suppose the biggest challenge would be what's facing officials right now: how do you separate the innocent from the guilty?

I'm old enough to remember the student protests against Vietnam [I had a draft lottery number myself] but the youth of then were a far more peaceful bunch than we have today where levels of intolerance have been deliberately provoked by social and broadcast media.