New York Times has their confidential documents online for anyone to see - Get the PDFs while you can

Example: [link to int.nyt.com (secure)]

How to find more.

Go to google and put this in the search bar

site: [link to int.nyt.com (secure)]

All kinds of shit in there, even some true polls showing Biden losing.

Oh my: [link to int.nyt.com (secure)]

I am not versed in law but have some limited knowledge from reading and researching, does anyone know if the "S" before his name indicates the letter of resignation was signed under DURESS?

I read somewhere awhile back that was an indicator or legal move of some kind. I used it during a medical procedure I forced into accepting againt my will and better judgement. So when I had to sign the docs I put the :s: in from of the signature not sure if it would hold up in court but it was worth a shot at the time.

Seeing that brought that memory up in the ole memory bank.

Anyone know?

"Oh my" what? An unclassified document from DHS?

All got duped huh!!!!!

I DON’T CARE IF THE DOCUMENTS ABOUT COVID ARE WRITTEN BY THE QUEEN OF SHEBA HERSELF!

THAT DOES NOT PREVENT COVID BEING A WORTHLESS PIECE OF SHIT HOAX ON THE ENTIRE GULLIBLE BRAINLESS BLIND PLANET!

Wow!!! So basically this was a proposal for influencing 5000 “targets”for the 2016 election. It breaks down how they will figure out who is a dtring voter for the “Lion” and who is strong for the “Bear”, and then all the undecideds will get bombarded with tailored FB, Twitter and YouTube propaganda for the Lion’s benefit!

Didn’t we almost lose our president to impeachment because “Russia” influenced people in our election?

Wow!!
Spread this far and wide!

Oh Shit!! a bomber was mailing IEDs to Obamas, Clintons, Harris, Biden, etc. in 2018

[link to int.nyt.com (secure)]

Oops.. I meant these charts.

Its pretty clear why they want mail in voting, check out the % that did not vote on all the negative Trump responses. Democrats have no chance of actually winning without mail in voting.

1. TheDNArecovered from thedressoutside rightsleeve swabs [ ] was determined to bea
mixtureofat least four contributors: three significant contributors, of whom at least one is
male, and at least one minor/trace-levelcontributor.
2. The # 2D dress outsideright sleeve swabs typing resultwas analyzed with STRmix
assuming fourcontributors. E . Jean Carrollwas then comparedto this resultas a potential
contributor
3. The DNA result from the dress outside rightsleeve swabs is approximately 3 million times
more likely ifthe DNAoriginated from E. Jean Carrollandthree unknownindividuals than
ifthe DNAoriginated from four unknownindividuals. This likelihood ratio provides very
strong support that E. Jean Carroll is a significantcontributorto this result.
4. This DNA result was analyzed with STRmix assuming four contributors and assuming E.
Jean Carrollas a contributor. was then compared to this result as a
potentialcontributor.
5. The DNAresult from the dress outsiderightsleeve swabs is approximately 1quadrillion
timesmore likely if theDNA originated from E . Jean Carroll, and two
unknown individuals than ifthe DNA originated from E. Jean Carrolland threeunknown
individuals. This likelihoodratio provides very strong supportthat
significant contributor to this result


E . Jean Carroll:

Everything's sympathetic to the Dems, hard on the Reps. Seems like a leak.

I DON’T CARE IF THE DOCUMENTS ABOUT COVID ARE WRITTEN BY THE QUEEN OF SHEBA HERSELF!

THAT DOES NOT PREVENT COVID BEING A WORTHLESS PIECE OF SHIT HOAX ON THE ENTIRE GULLIBLE BRAINLESS BLIND PLANET!