San Francisco Sen. Scott Wiener Introduces Bill to Decriminalize Men Having Sex With Boys

Yep! The Minor Attracted Persons (the PC term for pedophile, seriously) will most definitely love this bill becoming a Californian law.

[link to www.facebook.com (secure)]

facebook 800,000 Children missing each year
#SaveTheChildren .. March in Hollywood July 31 2020

Childrens Lives Matter


.

Wow, more debauchery, not surprised.

Well surprise surprise, Californication is full of weirdos and pederasts

Just wait until bestiality becomes legalized after pedophilia in America. Both children and pets will never be safe again.

:3rd CSA GLP:

why they delete the comments pointing out that Scott Wiener is a hebrew?

Then comes necrophilia.

Canaballism becomes normal after
fucking them to death.

Of course coming from San Francisco is no Surprise

But I'll tell you one thing. I've been on this site for well over a decade and a conspiracy guy for a long time

Most of the world thinks we're wackos and not credible, because of stupid conspiracy theories

Scrump wasn't joking he believes that, and that's one of the stupid things that makes us look dumb. that he thinks there's actually a smile that outs them

Just like flat Earth, and all the other stupid conspiracy theories that set out to make us look like imbeciles

The real conspiracies get hidden because of whacked-out shit like this and then people on the fence never crossover because they think we're wackos

LGBT activists have pushed reasonable notions of equality to its limits with obscene perversions. State Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco — the same lawmaker who co-sponsored a bill in 2017 to remove the felony penalty for knowingly exposing another person to HIV — has introduced a bill, Senate Bill 145 to give judges more flexibility in sentencing gay men who abuse minors.

Under current law — which Wiener, who is gay, describes as “horrific homophobia” — a straight 24-year-old male who has sex with a 15-year-old girl can avoid being put on the sex-offender list if the judge feels the situation does not deserve it, but a gay man in the same scenario with a similar-aged boy would not be given the same option.

Wiener’s argument is one of evolving social standards. In 2015, the California Supreme Court upheld the long-standing separation of vaginal sex from other forms of sex-based on the misguided idea that if pregnancy occurred, placing the father on the sex-offender list could ruin his chances of providing for his family. The extreme of the scenario would be an 18-year-old man with a 17-year-old girlfriend.

Wiener’s bill, however, is not so straightforward. He argues all forms of sex should be treated equally under the law.

Moreover, while there is room for flexibility in a ruling in which a boy turns 18 while his girlfriend is still 17 and her father presses charges, the bill defines the age minimum at 14. Recognizing that minors cannot legally consent to sex, Wiener argues that if a minor age 14 to 17 voluntarily has sex with an adult who is less than 10 years older, the judge should decide based on the individual facts of the case whether the adult should be placed on the sex-offender registry. Data provided by Wiener’s office states, “[A]t least 2,400 people on the [CA] sex-offender registry, and potentially hundreds more, have been convicted of non-vaginal sex with a minor age 14 or older.”

[link to thefederalist.com (secure)]

Note to self: blacklist anyone with the last name of Wiener. Um... blacklist anyone with the first name of Wiener as well.

I've never seen any admission of any sort like that from scrump. He's a solid poster on this board. If he chimes in and says that's the case then I will take what you said seriously. Until then it's a joke.