ALERT: President Trump is holding a live "press briefing" on Coronavirus NOW | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79256143 United States 08/13/2020 07:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Trump on masks: "Maybe they're great and maybe they're just good and maybe they're not so good," but "what do you have to lose." Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75934374 He still can't come up with a definitive statement one way or another about masks. But wait: "what do you have to lose." That's what he said about the game changing miracle drug, hydroxychloroquine. Freedom I guess Trump does not know what that word means. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79225142 United States 08/13/2020 07:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Trump on masks: "Maybe they're great and maybe they're just good and maybe they're not so good," but "what do you have to lose." Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75934374 He still can't come up with a definitive statement one way or another about masks. But wait: "what do you have to lose." That's what he said about the game changing miracle drug, hydroxychloroquine. Freedom I guess Trump does not know what that word means. Trump is such a whore , Does what the bankers tell him to do |
Eggcellently Deplorable
Re-Instate Smith-Mundt! User ID: 79077841 United States 08/13/2020 07:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wrong. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75934374 See above. It would literally be impossible for a foreign government to use mail in balloting to creating the millions of false votes it would take to throw even a close presidential election. You really think its as easy as cranking up a printer, printing off a million fake ballots. dumping them in collection ballots and having them counted? When it's the damned Dems operating and controlling the polling places, When it's Soros manufactured and operated voting machines counting the ballots, When it's a complicit MSM which only presents the pre-approved talking points, propaganda, and Election results, Then, yes. Yes I do. "I have come to the conclusion that all news should be treated like 9/11, assume it is a psyop with actors participating in a staged event complete with props, until proven otherwise, in which case assume whatever is being recorded, reported, televised, is distortions/lying by omission/outright lies, until proven otherwise." - Anonymous, 4-13-12 |
Eggcellently Deplorable
Re-Instate Smith-Mundt! User ID: 79077841 United States 08/13/2020 07:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Trump on masks: "Maybe they're great and maybe they're just good and maybe they're not so good," but "what do you have to lose." Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75934374 He still can't come up with a definitive statement one way or another about masks. But wait: "what do you have to lose." That's what he said about the game changing miracle drug, hydroxychloroquine. You have to understand Trump to know when he is just trolling TPTB. What he is saying is that he knows the masks are a bunch of bullshit. He just can't come out and say it without being crucified in the press. Those of us with an IQ over 85 can read between the lines. And, it probably IS a good thing that people aren't going around sneezing or hocking a loogie into other peoples' faces. "What have you got to lose?" was the question which Trump asked voters in 2016, and I think it's good that he brings it up now to echo in our minds and remind us that it brought on a good thing. "I have come to the conclusion that all news should be treated like 9/11, assume it is a psyop with actors participating in a staged event complete with props, until proven otherwise, in which case assume whatever is being recorded, reported, televised, is distortions/lying by omission/outright lies, until proven otherwise." - Anonymous, 4-13-12 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13577537 Denmark 08/13/2020 07:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13577537 Denmark 08/13/2020 07:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79259114 United States 08/13/2020 07:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Eggcellently Deplorable
Re-Instate Smith-Mundt! User ID: 79077841 United States 08/13/2020 07:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: PrezofTX Correction: Dear Leader says "universal mail-in voting" will result in fraud. He is okay with absentee voting. Furthermore, there remains no evidence of any substantial fraud with mailed in ballots. Dear Leader just doesn't want the Post Office overwhelmed with millions of ballots that fall from the sky. Absentee = good; universal mail-in = very bad. Post office delivers almost a half a billion packages and cards every Christmas. A regular letter took two weeks to get to my home in Oregon from my friend in Michigan. I mailed a check to an outfit 20 miles away over a month ago and they still haven't gotten it apparently since it hasn't hit my bank yet. And that's just regular mail, when there's no pressure, or Holidays, or three hundred million OTHER pieces of mail (Ballots) hitting the Post Office on the exact same day. "I have come to the conclusion that all news should be treated like 9/11, assume it is a psyop with actors participating in a staged event complete with props, until proven otherwise, in which case assume whatever is being recorded, reported, televised, is distortions/lying by omission/outright lies, until proven otherwise." - Anonymous, 4-13-12 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13577537 Denmark 08/13/2020 07:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79259114 United States 08/13/2020 07:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Eggcellently Deplorable
Re-Instate Smith-Mundt! User ID: 79077841 United States 08/13/2020 07:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Trump had no idea that Kamala was not qualified? Or the reason for her ineligibility? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72738806 What planet is he on? He said he would look into it. Planted question so that ALL Americans can look into it. Maybe Biden picked her knowing she wasn't qualified so he can now get out of his forced promise to pick a black woman. She can be forced to step down, his promise was fulfilled and now he is free of that yoke so he can pick who he really wants. That's pretty complicated for a guy who doesn't know where he is half the time. "I have come to the conclusion that all news should be treated like 9/11, assume it is a psyop with actors participating in a staged event complete with props, until proven otherwise, in which case assume whatever is being recorded, reported, televised, is distortions/lying by omission/outright lies, until proven otherwise." - Anonymous, 4-13-12 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79262929 United States 08/13/2020 07:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78277461 We are 48 hours in to having Harris as the Democrat VP running mate and we’re already here. 1988 Democratic presidential nominee Michael Dukakis, like Kamala Harris, was a natural born citizen, born in the U.S. to immigrant parents. Dukakis’ opponents never questioned his eligibility — no one did. And now we have the President of the United States beginning to embark on a witch hunt regardning just that. I wonder what’s different about Kamala Harris? Dukakis's parents were CITIZENS at the time of his birth. Kamala's were not. Her father STILL isn't. SHE IS NOT ELIGIBLE. I believe 14th amendment says if she was born in the US she automatically gets citizenship. Same issue with "anchor babies." You're wrong. The XIVth Amendment does nothing to alter the "natural born citizen" requirement...i.e. that both parents be citizens at the time of the candidate's birth. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79054426 Singapore 08/13/2020 07:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Trump seems to be starting up another of his birther witch hunts. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75934374 Trump says he’s just heard today, from a highly qualified lawyer, that Kamala Harris “doesn’t qualify” to serve as VP, is not sure if that’s true or not. That article was absolute nonsense; Harris, born in California, indisputably qualifies. This is how Trump does his birther lying - just-asking-questions, maybe-true-maybe-not, check-it-out. It’s garbage. Same as he did with with birther witch hunt of Obama. Actually, although she may have been born in California, she is NOT a natural-born citizen because neither of her parents were Citizens at the time she was born. They were "just passing through" on their way to Canada. Vattell defines "natural-born" as being born on a specific Country's soil, the product of two parents who are full-fledged citizens of that specific Country. He was the legal expert whose writings the Founders consulted and used as foundational to the construction of the Constitution. Who is "Vattell" and why didn't he complain that Michael Duaksis was not qualified to run in 1988? Dukakis is a natural born American, born in USA to immigrant parents who were not citizens. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79263443 United States 08/13/2020 07:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78277461 1988 Democratic presidential nominee Michael Dukakis, like Kamala Harris, was a natural born citizen, born in the U.S. to immigrant parents. Dukakis’ opponents never questioned his eligibility — no one did. And now we have the President of the United States beginning to embark on a witch hunt regardning just that. I wonder what’s different about Kamala Harris? Dukakis's parents were CITIZENS at the time of his birth. Kamala's were not. Her father STILL isn't. SHE IS NOT ELIGIBLE. I believe 14th amendment says if she was born in the US she automatically gets citizenship. Same issue with "anchor babies." You're wrong. The XIVth Amendment does nothing to alter the "natural born citizen" requirement...i.e. that both parents be citizens at the time of the candidate's birth. Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." The 14th says nowhere that "both parents be citizens at the time of the candidate's birth". You made that part up. Secondly: A natural-born citizen refers to someone who was a U.S. citizen at birth, and did not need to go through a naturalization proceeding later in life. [link to harvardlawreview.org (secure)] |
Eggcellently Deplorable
Re-Instate Smith-Mundt! User ID: 79077841 United States 08/13/2020 07:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The President makes the absurd suggestion that Democrats want schools closed to keep the polling booths closed Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75934374 Video: [link to twitter.com (secure)] It's plain to see that the dems want to keep the virus scare going until they get their mail in voting. Obvious to anyone looking. AOC tweeted that businesses should stay closed as long as possible and that the loss of those businesses was worth it if they could keep the economy down and hurt Trump. So I can see how they would want to keep schools closed for their election cheating agenda. They'll go to any lengths necessary. I won't be surprised at all if Nov. 3rd is the cure for covid. so you think the virus is just for the US election? how did the dems convince all the other nations of the globe to go in on the con if this is all just for american politics? All they had to do was to "convince" China ( which wasn't too difficult since they hated Trump for humiliating them in the new trade agreements ) and give their scientists some private R&D funding to get the ball rolling. The fact that the virus spread to other countries wasn't a concern, especially since China wanted to be economically superior to them too. They may have hoped that any virus coming in from Europe would mask the actual starting spot which was Wuhan. Seems like I read here a while back about a meeting held somewhere in Europe (Belgium?) between Obama, Hillary, Soros , some Chinese guys, and some highly placed Democrats. Some speculation, very few facts, and a quick disappearance into the Black Hole of former GLP threads. "I have come to the conclusion that all news should be treated like 9/11, assume it is a psyop with actors participating in a staged event complete with props, until proven otherwise, in which case assume whatever is being recorded, reported, televised, is distortions/lying by omission/outright lies, until proven otherwise." - Anonymous, 4-13-12 |
Eggcellently Deplorable
Re-Instate Smith-Mundt! User ID: 79077841 United States 08/13/2020 07:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Trump seems to be starting up another of his birther witch hunts. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75934374 Trump says he’s just heard today, from a highly qualified lawyer, that Kamala Harris “doesn’t qualify” to serve as VP, is not sure if that’s true or not. That article was absolute nonsense; Harris, born in California, indisputably qualifies. This is how Trump does his birther lying - just-asking-questions, maybe-true-maybe-not, check-it-out. It’s garbage. Same as he did with with birther witch hunt of Obama. We are 48 hours in to having Harris as the Democrat VP running mate and we’re already here. Uhhhhh, someone asked HIM a question, he didn't bring it up. If You're going to be unpleasant, at least be truthful about it. "I have come to the conclusion that all news should be treated like 9/11, assume it is a psyop with actors participating in a staged event complete with props, until proven otherwise, in which case assume whatever is being recorded, reported, televised, is distortions/lying by omission/outright lies, until proven otherwise." - Anonymous, 4-13-12 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79253496 United States 08/13/2020 07:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79263402 Taiwan 08/13/2020 07:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79253496 United States 08/13/2020 08:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Eggcellently Deplorable
Re-Instate Smith-Mundt! User ID: 79077841 United States 08/13/2020 08:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1988 Democratic presidential nominee Michael Dukakis, like Kamala Harris, was a natural born citizen, born in the U.S. to immigrant parents. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78277461 Dukakis’ opponents never questioned his eligibility — no one did. And now we have the President of the United States beginning to embark on a witch hunt regardning just that. I wonder what’s different about Kamala Harris? Well, although Dukakis's parents were from Greece, had they attained American Citizenship by the time that Dukakis was born in 1933? We DO know that NEITHER of Harris's parents were American citizens, they were just "passing through" on their way to Canada when she was born. "I have come to the conclusion that all news should be treated like 9/11, assume it is a psyop with actors participating in a staged event complete with props, until proven otherwise, in which case assume whatever is being recorded, reported, televised, is distortions/lying by omission/outright lies, until proven otherwise." - Anonymous, 4-13-12 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69999830 United States 08/13/2020 08:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Eggcellently Deplorable
Re-Instate Smith-Mundt! User ID: 79077841 United States 08/13/2020 08:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78277461 We are 48 hours in to having Harris as the Democrat VP running mate and we’re already here. 1988 Democratic presidential nominee Michael Dukakis, like Kamala Harris, was a natural born citizen, born in the U.S. to immigrant parents. Dukakis’ opponents never questioned his eligibility — no one did. And now we have the President of the United States beginning to embark on a witch hunt regardning just that. I wonder what’s different about Kamala Harris? Dukakis's parents were CITIZENS at the time of his birth. Kamala's were not. Her father STILL isn't. SHE IS NOT ELIGIBLE. I believe 14th amendment says if she was born in the US she automatically gets citizenship. Same issue with "anchor babies." YES, they ARE "Citizens". But they are NOT "Natural Born " Citizens because their parents are not citizens. they DO have ALL of the perks and privileges of am American Citizen EXCEPT THE ABILITY TO BE PRESIDENT OR VICE-PRESIDENT. They can be Senators, Congressmen, or even Governors. But when it came to the ultimate leaders of the Country the Founders wanted there to be absolutely NO possibility that there could be split loyalties. "I have come to the conclusion that all news should be treated like 9/11, assume it is a psyop with actors participating in a staged event complete with props, until proven otherwise, in which case assume whatever is being recorded, reported, televised, is distortions/lying by omission/outright lies, until proven otherwise." - Anonymous, 4-13-12 |
NoCap
User ID: 70591657 United States 08/13/2020 08:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79262929 Dukakis's parents were CITIZENS at the time of his birth. Kamala's were not. Her father STILL isn't. SHE IS NOT ELIGIBLE. I believe 14th amendment says if she was born in the US she automatically gets citizenship. Same issue with "anchor babies." You're wrong. The XIVth Amendment does nothing to alter the "natural born citizen" requirement...i.e. that both parents be citizens at the time of the candidate's birth. Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." The 14th says nowhere that "both parents be citizens at the time of the candidate's birth". You made that part up. Secondly: A natural-born citizen refers to someone who was a U.S. citizen at birth, and did not need to go through a naturalization proceeding later in life. [link to harvardlawreview.org (secure)] That's right! You can't make up the rules as you go. A person born in the US is a US citizen PERIOD!!!! |
Eggcellently Deplorable
Re-Instate Smith-Mundt! User ID: 79077841 United States 08/13/2020 08:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A lot of us spent hours and days and weeks fighting Obama's eligibility in 2008. Looking back on it, I can't help but notice that we spent all of our time mired down and trying to prevent/remove him legally when we should have been fighting against him personally. But at the time we didn't know the depths of the Democrats' depravity, we didn't realize that there was no longer any Law and Order here in the U.S. The Dems had us chasing our tails right up to the election and actually beyond. It looks like they're starting right out to do the same thing with THIS Election, to re-direct our attention and get us stuck on that same loop. I guess you can't argue with success. "I have come to the conclusion that all news should be treated like 9/11, assume it is a psyop with actors participating in a staged event complete with props, until proven otherwise, in which case assume whatever is being recorded, reported, televised, is distortions/lying by omission/outright lies, until proven otherwise." - Anonymous, 4-13-12 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79128512 United States 08/13/2020 08:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78277461 1988 Democratic presidential nominee Michael Dukakis, like Kamala Harris, was a natural born citizen, born in the U.S. to immigrant parents. Dukakis’ opponents never questioned his eligibility — no one did. And now we have the President of the United States beginning to embark on a witch hunt regardning just that. I wonder what’s different about Kamala Harris? Dukakis's parents were CITIZENS at the time of his birth. Kamala's were not. Her father STILL isn't. SHE IS NOT ELIGIBLE. I believe 14th amendment says if she was born in the US she automatically gets citizenship. Same issue with "anchor babies." YES, they ARE "Citizens". But they are NOT "Natural Born " Citizens because their parents are not citizens. they DO have ALL of the perks and privileges of am American Citizen EXCEPT THE ABILITY TO BE PRESIDENT OR VICE-PRESIDENT. They can be Senators, Congressmen, or even Governors. But when it came to the ultimate leaders of the Country the Founders wanted there to be absolutely NO possibility that there could be split loyalties. The legal definition of "natural born citizen" is simply one who was born on US soil. Where the parents are from isn't relevant. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29379744 United States 08/13/2020 09:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Impossible. I live in a mail in only state and just voted in local elections a couple of weeks ago. Here's how it worked. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78537041 1. A couple of months ago, I received a signature card, which I had to sign and return if I wanted a ballot. Only registered voters got these. 2. My ballot was printed on some kind of safety paper, serialized with numbers, and had bar codes that are checked when the ballot is returned. 3. Ballot goes into a secrecy sleeve, that goes into an envelope and you sign the envelope. 4. When received, signature is checked against the signature card and the serial numbers and bar codes are verified against the database to confirm it is a valid ballot. Now you tell me how China or Russia is going to print millions of fake ballots and get them counted. 1: How do you verify that the person who signed the card is the person who actually resides at that address? In a normal election, voter rolls are verified at the polling station with a photo ID. 2: China makes the safety paper and therefore will know the sequence of serials and bar codes. 3: Dems keep bringing up "signing the envelope" but I'm not sure what good this actually does? In fact, it means that the ballot is no longer a secret ballot, as anyone who opens it will know who cast it by looking at the envelope. A disgruntled postal employee could cross reference the envelope with voter registration records and dispose of ballots from the opposing party. 4: Again, who signed the signature card in the first place? There is no verification. OK, I live in Hawaii and it's all mail in here. We had primaries last week. 1. Same process. Got a signature card a couple of months ago, then the ballot. Of course it's the person who lives there. Otherwise, someone would have to go to your mailbox every day, steal the signature card, keep checking every day and then steal the ballot. OK, I guess this could happen, but you need millions of votes to throw a presidential election. So the Chinese and Russians will be sending armies of people to check everyone's mailboxes every day? 2. No, the state buys the safety paper and then they print the ballots, including numbers and bar codes from some secret algorithm, just like states do on lottery tickets. You would never in a million years be able to both buy the paper and also print acceptable numbers and bar codes . 3. It is a secret ballot. Read what the other guy said. Your ballot goes into a sleeve. Then the sleeve goes into an envelope. The signature on the outside is matched to the name and bar code on the outside envelope by machine. If it matches, the outside envelope is discarded then the sleeve is passed on with the ballot removed at another place. There are observers from both parties watching each step. Come on...what disgruntled postal worker is going to have all the voter registration records and the time to sit and manually compare envelopes to voters' names? That's ridiculous. 4. The registered voter at the registered address signs the card two months before the election, then signs the ballot envelope when that gets sent in two months later. Sure, maybe it could be another person living at the address who is will to risk vote fraud, but nobody can organize something like that on a large scale. But then, we could talk about voting machines with no paper trail that can be hacked, but that is not mail in ballots with complete paper trails. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29379744 United States 08/13/2020 09:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A lot of us spent hours and days and weeks fighting Obama's eligibility in 2008. Looking back on it, I can't help but notice that we spent all of our time mired down and trying to prevent/remove him legally when we should have been fighting against him personally. But at the time we didn't know the depths of the Democrats' depravity, we didn't realize that there was no longer any Law and Order here in the U.S. Quoting: Eggcellently Deplorable The Dems had us chasing our tails right up to the election and actually beyond. It looks like they're starting right out to do the same thing with THIS Election, to re-direct our attention and get us stuck on that same loop. I guess you can't argue with success. And it was all a witch hunt, nothing happened and then even Donald Trump, the chief birther conspiracy theorist, publicly stated "President Barack Obama was born in the United States. Period". And that was a couple of years after he promised a huge, bombshell press conference about Obama's birth certificate. [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] Never happened. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78212961 France 08/13/2020 09:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78277461 1988 Democratic presidential nominee Michael Dukakis, like Kamala Harris, was a natural born citizen, born in the U.S. to immigrant parents. Dukakis’ opponents never questioned his eligibility — no one did. And now we have the President of the United States beginning to embark on a witch hunt regardning just that. I wonder what’s different about Kamala Harris? Dukakis's parents were CITIZENS at the time of his birth. Kamala's were not. Her father STILL isn't. SHE IS NOT ELIGIBLE. I believe 14th amendment says if she was born in the US she automatically gets citizenship. Same issue with "anchor babies." You're wrong. The XIVth Amendment does nothing to alter the "natural born citizen" requirement...i.e. that both parents be citizens at the time of the candidate's birth. You dimwits keep pulling shit that will not work. Resign your peckerwood hearts to your coming beat down. Brown,black, red, and yellow are a multicolored wave engulfing your redneck cracker asses. Millenials are on board with the agenda; if your old and white, act right. If your black and brown, get down. Kamala is running the show. She will run it for the next 12 years. Get glad in the same peckerwood boots you got mad in. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78212961 France 08/13/2020 09:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1988 Democratic presidential nominee Michael Dukakis, like Kamala Harris, was a natural born citizen, born in the U.S. to immigrant parents. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78277461 Dukakis’ opponents never questioned his eligibility — no one did. And now we have the President of the United States beginning to embark on a witch hunt regardning just that. I wonder what’s different about Kamala Harris? Well, although Dukakis's parents were from Greece, had they attained American Citizenship by the time that Dukakis was born in 1933? We DO know that NEITHER of Harris's parents were American citizens, they were just "passing through" on their way to Canada when she was born. She will be running the show for 12 years. Your bullshit is useless. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79089684 Canada 08/13/2020 09:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |