Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible)

"To a point"..... adapting is not the same as changing into a different organism. Period. Evolution is changing from one organism to another. Period. If you can't even handle the simple definitions of words, then I won't be wasting time on you.

Though it has the potentials of changing at some point to a different organism, the evolution.

The only evidence I see of evolution is mental.

The NWO has successfully evolved the minds of many
individuals of last 2 generations into dumbed down,
entitled, sexually screwed up libtards.

Creationism needs no predictions? Then you have left the realm of science.

You seem to completely miss the value of science, and how much it has provided to humanity. All scientific theories make predictions about the behavior of some aspect of the natural word. Newtons theories for example enable us to predict the orbit of a celestial body before we ever observe a full orbit. This has enabled us to plot complex trajectories for satellites and rockets.

Evolution theory predicts the exact sequence of the fossil record. For example: If fish evolved into amphibians, then in order to find transitional fossils between those groups, we should look in the rock layers dated between the emergence of the first fish and the first amphibians. Paleontologists looked and they discovered new species species such as tiktalik, which have the traits of fish and amphibians.

Evolution theory predicts that the vertebrate fossil record will go: fish>amphibian>reptile>dinosaur>bird, and we never find anything that breaks this sequence. There are no birds before the first land animals, no rabbits before the dinosaurs, no apes before reptiles etc

Evolution also predicts which species will share the most ERVs (hereditary viral genes) based on this same sequence we observe in the fossil record, and it all matches up.

Evolution is the process of change in all forms of life over generations.

Pretty clear. It has nothing to do into changing to a different organism, please specify the parameters of the change if you believe so.

Wow, 4 Creationists having a circle jerk while 99% of scientists continue to accept the validity of evolution.

Evolution is directly observable. You're not going to make it disappear by playing with math.

That's the whole point. Creationism doesn't require science. Science is man trying to figure out creation.

I understand the value of science. It pales in comparison to what has been created. Your science will never bring you to the point of being able to create what He already created. It is just child's play by comparison.

What you think you see in the fossil record is all there is to your project. You are not going to discover an evolution from one creature alive today into another, new creature. There are no examples of any creature that is in the process of changing into something different. There are only variations and those have been exactly as they are now for thousands of years (since at least the great flood).

So, we didn't evolve from fish?

So, we didn't evolve from fish?

So, we didn't evolve from fish?

Some fish are very tasty, if we evolved from fish that would make us cannibals to our ancestors...LOL!

That's right. Adaptation is not evolution. Flies reproduce so abundantly that we would have see them evolve into a different species by now if that was going to happen. It's not as if they haven't been bombarded with environmental factors that cause mutations, either. Radiation. The only evolution we are getting from the leaking nuke plants is fish with both sexes.

There is a giant leap in the evolution scale no one can explain. I am convinced we are just a messed up alien experiment missing many DNA strands

And that comforts you more than knowing you were specially created by someone who loves you?

Wow, 4 Creationists having a circle jerk while 99% of scientists continue to accept the validity of evolution.

Evolution is directly observable. You're not going to make it disappear by playing with math.

That's the whole point. Creationism doesn't require science. Science is man trying to figure out creation.

I understand the value of science. It pales in comparison to what has been created. Your science will never bring you to the point of being able to create what He already created. It is just child's play by comparison.

What you think you see in the fossil record is all there is to your project. You are not going to discover an evolution from one creature alive today into another, new creature. There are no examples of any creature that is in the process of changing into something different. There are only variations and those have been exactly as they are now for thousands of years (since at least the great flood).

It is directly observable that evolution is a lie. I don't know what you are talking about. Show me the missing link.

So, you presuppose your conclusion, independent of the data, and you will dismiss any data that contradicts your model. Not the best way to acquire knowledge in my opinion.

We do see evolution occurring today. Changes accumulate every generation. We have evidence that seals were land animals, and they appear to be in the process of becoming more aquatic. A thousand years isn't that long for evolution to take place. It's estimated that lions and house cats diverged from a common ancestor close to 8 million years ago.

Missing link between what? We have about 20 hominin species that are more human-like than any living ape. When we line them up chronologically, the presence of human-like traits increase with time. Brains get bigger, teeth get smaller, arms get shorter etc.

And that comforts you more than knowing you were specially created by someone who loves you?

Some people want the truth even if it's not comforting.

You are looking at the corruption of all flesh described in the time before the great flood and interpreting it to mean something it's not. Nothing evolved.

And you think the truth is that aliens created everything? Who created the aliens?

Says you. Why aren't humans present before these hominins if they are corrupted flesh?

Why does the corrupted flesh get closer to human over time?

I don't think aliens created everything. I was pointing out that you are more concerned with how comforting something is rather than if it's true.