Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78640487 United Kingdom 08/20/2020 06:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78640487 Evolution is the process of change in all forms of life over generations. It needs no proof, to adapt to the environment that one lives in, is natural. Adaptation and evolution are two different things. We went over this about 3 pages back. Start there. Doesn't matter what you went over here, there are definition so that people can communicate with each other, Evolution goes with adaption to a point, and it also includes but is not limited to the environment, to the dna change that is natural and not natural, to the random change by luck or no luck and goes on. Either way Adaption and evolution are one and the same. Evolution is the process of change in all forms of life over generations. "To a point"..... adapting is not the same as changing into a different organism. Period. Evolution is changing from one organism to another. Period. If you can't even handle the simple definitions of words, then I won't be wasting time on you. Evolution is the process of change in all forms of life over generations. Pretty clear. It has nothing to do into changing to a different organism, please specify the parameters of the change if you believe so. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78640487 United Kingdom 08/20/2020 06:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78640487 United Kingdom 08/20/2020 06:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
beeches
User ID: 78973486 United States 08/20/2020 06:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) The only evidence I see of evolution is mental. Quoting: Trained Noticer The NWO has successfully evolved the minds of many individuals of last 2 generations into dumbed down, entitled, sexually screwed up libtards. way faster than Darwin's snail pace, too. Liberalism is totalitarianism with a human face – Thomas Sowell |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78640487 United Kingdom 08/20/2020 06:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) Have to ask, evolution is natural to a point, can't do anything about it, you can derail it and become destructive though as we see it happening now, but the question is, did we adapt to the new data of the here and now?, surely evolution is happening constantly, but did we become smarter? with more common sense?, less destructive? more logical?, less arrogant? with more patience and understanding? there is the technical part of adaption and evolution if you want to take it as different, but there is also the practical part, do you believe the practical part supports the actual change through centuries?, cause personally to the here and now it seems that nothing has changed. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79283235 United States 08/20/2020 06:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79283235 Three theory of evolution and the big bang are both derived from the Kabbalah. In fact, all of our science is. That's the reason science was rejected as sorcery by the church. The priest and Darwin did not invent them. Thats where you are going wrong with your assessment of my interpretation of the theories. Why do you think all science comes from the kabbalah? Can you back that up? Even if that's the case, it doesn't matter. There are physicists with alternative models to the big bang theory, and they still accept evolution. Likewise, there are some scientists that accept the big bang theory but not evolution. So this is just a pointless tangent. Evolution prevails because it is objectively the most practical theory. It makes the most accurate predictions. Using evolution theory, we can predict where fossils will appear and the order in which they appear. We can predict which two species will share the most viruses and genetic markers. We can predict the long term effects of medicine. Creationism can't make any predictions. It has no applications. It's useless. As soon as a theory comes along that makes more accurate predictions than evolution, then evolution will be replaced, but so far there's no sign of that happening. I certainly can back that up. Read it for yourself. It's not as easy as pointing out a page that says "science started here". What true predictions come from evolution? All I've ever seen is interpretations of the past. Creationism needs no predictions. It already is as it should be. Creationism needs no predictions? Then you have left the realm of science. You seem to completely miss the value of science, and how much it has provided to humanity. All scientific theories make predictions about the behavior of some aspect of the natural word. Newtons theories for example enable us to predict the orbit of a celestial body before we ever observe a full orbit. This has enabled us to plot complex trajectories for satellites and rockets. Evolution theory predicts the exact sequence of the fossil record. For example: If fish evolved into amphibians, then in order to find transitional fossils between those groups, we should look in the rock layers dated between the emergence of the first fish and the first amphibians. Paleontologists looked and they discovered new species species such as tiktalik, which have the traits of fish and amphibians. Evolution theory predicts that the vertebrate fossil record will go: fish>amphibian>reptile>dinosaur>bird, and we never find anything that breaks this sequence. There are no birds before the first land animals, no rabbits before the dinosaurs, no apes before reptiles etc Evolution also predicts which species will share the most ERVs (hereditary viral genes) based on this same sequence we observe in the fossil record, and it all matches up. That's the whole point. Creationism doesn't require science. Science is man trying to figure out creation. I understand the value of science. It pales in comparison to what has been created. Your science will never bring you to the point of being able to create what He already created. It is just child's play by comparison. What you think you see in the fossil record is all there is to your project. You are not going to discover an evolution from one creature alive today into another, new creature. There are no examples of any creature that is in the process of changing into something different. There are only variations and those have been exactly as they are now for thousands of years (since at least the great flood). |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79283235 United States 08/20/2020 06:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79283235 Adaptation and evolution are two different things. We went over this about 3 pages back. Start there. Doesn't matter what you went over here, there are definition so that people can communicate with each other, Evolution goes with adaption to a point, and it also includes but is not limited to the environment, to the dna change that is natural and not natural, to the random change by luck or no luck and goes on. Either way Adaption and evolution are one and the same. Evolution is the process of change in all forms of life over generations. "To a point"..... adapting is not the same as changing into a different organism. Period. Evolution is changing from one organism to another. Period. If you can't even handle the simple definitions of words, then I won't be wasting time on you. Evolution is the process of change in all forms of life over generations. Pretty clear. It has nothing to do into changing to a different organism, please specify the parameters of the change if you believe so. So, we didn't evolve from fish? |
hollyavila
User ID: 77491669 United States 08/20/2020 06:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) Wow, 4 Creationists having a circle jerk while 99% of scientists continue to accept the validity of evolution. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79198827 Evolution is directly observable. You're not going to make it disappear by playing with math. It is directly observable that evolution is a lie. I don't know what you are talking about. Show me the missing link. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78640487 United Kingdom 08/20/2020 06:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79198827 Why do you think all science comes from the kabbalah? Can you back that up? Even if that's the case, it doesn't matter. There are physicists with alternative models to the big bang theory, and they still accept evolution. Likewise, there are some scientists that accept the big bang theory but not evolution. So this is just a pointless tangent. Evolution prevails because it is objectively the most practical theory. It makes the most accurate predictions. Using evolution theory, we can predict where fossils will appear and the order in which they appear. We can predict which two species will share the most viruses and genetic markers. We can predict the long term effects of medicine. Creationism can't make any predictions. It has no applications. It's useless. As soon as a theory comes along that makes more accurate predictions than evolution, then evolution will be replaced, but so far there's no sign of that happening. I certainly can back that up. Read it for yourself. It's not as easy as pointing out a page that says "science started here". What true predictions come from evolution? All I've ever seen is interpretations of the past. Creationism needs no predictions. It already is as it should be. Creationism needs no predictions? Then you have left the realm of science. You seem to completely miss the value of science, and how much it has provided to humanity. All scientific theories make predictions about the behavior of some aspect of the natural word. Newtons theories for example enable us to predict the orbit of a celestial body before we ever observe a full orbit. This has enabled us to plot complex trajectories for satellites and rockets. Evolution theory predicts the exact sequence of the fossil record. For example: If fish evolved into amphibians, then in order to find transitional fossils between those groups, we should look in the rock layers dated between the emergence of the first fish and the first amphibians. Paleontologists looked and they discovered new species species such as tiktalik, which have the traits of fish and amphibians. Evolution theory predicts that the vertebrate fossil record will go: fish>amphibian>reptile>dinosaur>bird, and we never find anything that breaks this sequence. There are no birds before the first land animals, no rabbits before the dinosaurs, no apes before reptiles etc Evolution also predicts which species will share the most ERVs (hereditary viral genes) based on this same sequence we observe in the fossil record, and it all matches up. That's the whole point. Creationism doesn't require science. Science is man trying to figure out creation. I understand the value of science. It pales in comparison to what has been created. Your science will never bring you to the point of being able to create what He already created. It is just child's play by comparison. What you think you see in the fossil record is all there is to your project. You are not going to discover an evolution from one creature alive today into another, new creature. There are no examples of any creature that is in the process of changing into something different. There are only variations and those have been exactly as they are now for thousands of years (since at least the great flood). For what science are you talking about? they can't even go to the moon till 2024 and they make plans for Mars, they call themselves scientists whilst they wear a pantie mask for the virus that THEY called SARS-CoV-2, science can't figure out what SARS-CoV-2 is, whilst technically knowing what it is and knowing what it requires to be safe and at the same time to do the exact opposite of what science , what THEY claim to be true. There is no science at the moment that makes sense and is logical, they are Charlatans trying to push a magical crap for a cure for something that they even don't believe that exists from what their actions are. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75487912 United States 08/20/2020 07:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78640487 Doesn't matter what you went over here, there are definition so that people can communicate with each other, Evolution goes with adaption to a point, and it also includes but is not limited to the environment, to the dna change that is natural and not natural, to the random change by luck or no luck and goes on. Either way Adaption and evolution are one and the same. Evolution is the process of change in all forms of life over generations. "To a point"..... adapting is not the same as changing into a different organism. Period. Evolution is changing from one organism to another. Period. If you can't even handle the simple definitions of words, then I won't be wasting time on you. Evolution is the process of change in all forms of life over generations. Pretty clear. It has nothing to do into changing to a different organism, please specify the parameters of the change if you believe so. So, we didn't evolve from fish? It seems more logical that all life evolved from single cell lifeforms than just magically created. Who knows though none of us can say for certain. |
hollyavila
User ID: 77491669 United States 08/20/2020 07:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78640487 Doesn't matter what you went over here, there are definition so that people can communicate with each other, Evolution goes with adaption to a point, and it also includes but is not limited to the environment, to the dna change that is natural and not natural, to the random change by luck or no luck and goes on. Either way Adaption and evolution are one and the same. Evolution is the process of change in all forms of life over generations. "To a point"..... adapting is not the same as changing into a different organism. Period. Evolution is changing from one organism to another. Period. If you can't even handle the simple definitions of words, then I won't be wasting time on you. Evolution is the process of change in all forms of life over generations. Pretty clear. It has nothing to do into changing to a different organism, please specify the parameters of the change if you believe so. So, we didn't evolve from fish? That's right. Adaptation is not evolution. Flies reproduce so abundantly that we would have see them evolve into a different species by now if that was going to happen. It's not as if they haven't been bombarded with environmental factors that cause mutations, either. Radiation. The only evolution we are getting from the leaking nuke plants is fish with both sexes. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78640487 United Kingdom 08/20/2020 07:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78640487 Doesn't matter what you went over here, there are definition so that people can communicate with each other, Evolution goes with adaption to a point, and it also includes but is not limited to the environment, to the dna change that is natural and not natural, to the random change by luck or no luck and goes on. Either way Adaption and evolution are one and the same. Evolution is the process of change in all forms of life over generations. "To a point"..... adapting is not the same as changing into a different organism. Period. Evolution is changing from one organism to another. Period. If you can't even handle the simple definitions of words, then I won't be wasting time on you. Evolution is the process of change in all forms of life over generations. Pretty clear. It has nothing to do into changing to a different organism, please specify the parameters of the change if you believe so. So, we didn't evolve from fish? Some fish are very tasty, if we evolved from fish that would make us cannibals to our ancestors...LOL! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79283235 United States 08/20/2020 07:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79283235 "To a point"..... adapting is not the same as changing into a different organism. Period. Evolution is changing from one organism to another. Period. If you can't even handle the simple definitions of words, then I won't be wasting time on you. Evolution is the process of change in all forms of life over generations. Pretty clear. It has nothing to do into changing to a different organism, please specify the parameters of the change if you believe so. So, we didn't evolve from fish? Some fish are very tasty, if we evolved from fish that would make us cannibals to our ancestors...LOL! Sounds like the munchies are starting to kick in. :)) |
MaxTork
User ID: 71016556 United States 08/20/2020 07:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) I don’t really feel like watching the video, but will chime in on Darwin anyway. I’ve always considered Darwin as a nice theory of what could happen, given enough time and the right circumstances, but not probably what DID happen. As in, given enough time, a monkey could compose a concerto, but can we really wait. Darwin fell apart for me early on, probably that day in middle school or high school science when we learned how man evolved from the apes. I sat quietly and considered how many steps of evolution it would take to start from an ape and end with a human. I didn’t have an exact number, but it was enough to know that it was hundreds to thousands of steps. If a step was strong enough to pass on its DNA, it was also strong enough to survive. Each step would have a lineage, some of which would survive and be distinguishable from the other steps. You don’t need to be a mathematician to imagine how many different iterations of ape-men would exist today. Instead of that, we have 7 billion or so human beings on the planet anatomically identical. Are you trying to tell me that no other evolutionary steps survived? |
KuvaszLove
User ID: 76863067 United States 08/20/2020 07:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78640487 United Kingdom 08/20/2020 07:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79283235 "To a point"..... adapting is not the same as changing into a different organism. Period. Evolution is changing from one organism to another. Period. If you can't even handle the simple definitions of words, then I won't be wasting time on you. Evolution is the process of change in all forms of life over generations. Pretty clear. It has nothing to do into changing to a different organism, please specify the parameters of the change if you believe so. So, we didn't evolve from fish? That's right. Adaptation is not evolution. Flies reproduce so abundantly that we would have see them evolve into a different species by now if that was going to happen. It's not as if they haven't been bombarded with environmental factors that cause mutations, either. Radiation. The only evolution we are getting from the leaking nuke plants is fish with both sexes. To have been evolved from fish has nothing to do with adaption and evolution if you take them differently and if you take them as one which is the right thing to do, evolution has nothing to do with evolving from fish and at the same time it could do everything for evolving by fish. Either way, Evolution is the process of change in all forms of life over generations. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79283235 United States 08/20/2020 07:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78640487 United Kingdom 08/20/2020 07:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) There is a giant leap in the evolution scale no one can explain. I am convinced we are just a messed up alien experiment missing many DNA strands Quoting: KuvaszLove And that comforts you more than knowing you were specially created by someone who loves you? hahahahahahahahaha, LOL! that was hilarious. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77872699 United States 08/20/2020 07:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79198827 Australia 08/20/2020 07:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79198827 Why do you think all science comes from the kabbalah? Can you back that up? Even if that's the case, it doesn't matter. There are physicists with alternative models to the big bang theory, and they still accept evolution. Likewise, there are some scientists that accept the big bang theory but not evolution. So this is just a pointless tangent. Evolution prevails because it is objectively the most practical theory. It makes the most accurate predictions. Using evolution theory, we can predict where fossils will appear and the order in which they appear. We can predict which two species will share the most viruses and genetic markers. We can predict the long term effects of medicine. Creationism can't make any predictions. It has no applications. It's useless. As soon as a theory comes along that makes more accurate predictions than evolution, then evolution will be replaced, but so far there's no sign of that happening. I certainly can back that up. Read it for yourself. It's not as easy as pointing out a page that says "science started here". What true predictions come from evolution? All I've ever seen is interpretations of the past. Creationism needs no predictions. It already is as it should be. Creationism needs no predictions? Then you have left the realm of science. You seem to completely miss the value of science, and how much it has provided to humanity. All scientific theories make predictions about the behavior of some aspect of the natural word. Newtons theories for example enable us to predict the orbit of a celestial body before we ever observe a full orbit. This has enabled us to plot complex trajectories for satellites and rockets. Evolution theory predicts the exact sequence of the fossil record. For example: If fish evolved into amphibians, then in order to find transitional fossils between those groups, we should look in the rock layers dated between the emergence of the first fish and the first amphibians. Paleontologists looked and they discovered new species species such as tiktalik, which have the traits of fish and amphibians. Evolution theory predicts that the vertebrate fossil record will go: fish>amphibian>reptile>dinosaur>bird, and we never find anything that breaks this sequence. There are no birds before the first land animals, no rabbits before the dinosaurs, no apes before reptiles etc Evolution also predicts which species will share the most ERVs (hereditary viral genes) based on this same sequence we observe in the fossil record, and it all matches up. That's the whole point. Creationism doesn't require science. Science is man trying to figure out creation. I understand the value of science. It pales in comparison to what has been created. Your science will never bring you to the point of being able to create what He already created. It is just child's play by comparison. What you think you see in the fossil record is all there is to your project. You are not going to discover an evolution from one creature alive today into another, new creature. There are no examples of any creature that is in the process of changing into something different. There are only variations and those have been exactly as they are now for thousands of years (since at least the great flood). So, you presuppose your conclusion, independent of the data, and you will dismiss any data that contradicts your model. Not the best way to acquire knowledge in my opinion. We do see evolution occurring today. Changes accumulate every generation. We have evidence that seals were land animals, and they appear to be in the process of becoming more aquatic. A thousand years isn't that long for evolution to take place. It's estimated that lions and house cats diverged from a common ancestor close to 8 million years ago. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79198827 Australia 08/20/2020 07:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) Wow, 4 Creationists having a circle jerk while 99% of scientists continue to accept the validity of evolution. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79198827 Evolution is directly observable. You're not going to make it disappear by playing with math. It is directly observable that evolution is a lie. I don't know what you are talking about. Show me the missing link. Missing link between what? We have about 20 hominin species that are more human-like than any living ape. When we line them up chronologically, the presence of human-like traits increase with time. Brains get bigger, teeth get smaller, arms get shorter etc. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79283235 United States 08/20/2020 07:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79283235 I certainly can back that up. Read it for yourself. It's not as easy as pointing out a page that says "science started here". What true predictions come from evolution? All I've ever seen is interpretations of the past. Creationism needs no predictions. It already is as it should be. Creationism needs no predictions? Then you have left the realm of science. You seem to completely miss the value of science, and how much it has provided to humanity. All scientific theories make predictions about the behavior of some aspect of the natural word. Newtons theories for example enable us to predict the orbit of a celestial body before we ever observe a full orbit. This has enabled us to plot complex trajectories for satellites and rockets. Evolution theory predicts the exact sequence of the fossil record. For example: If fish evolved into amphibians, then in order to find transitional fossils between those groups, we should look in the rock layers dated between the emergence of the first fish and the first amphibians. Paleontologists looked and they discovered new species species such as tiktalik, which have the traits of fish and amphibians. Evolution theory predicts that the vertebrate fossil record will go: fish>amphibian>reptile>dinosaur>bird, and we never find anything that breaks this sequence. There are no birds before the first land animals, no rabbits before the dinosaurs, no apes before reptiles etc Evolution also predicts which species will share the most ERVs (hereditary viral genes) based on this same sequence we observe in the fossil record, and it all matches up. That's the whole point. Creationism doesn't require science. Science is man trying to figure out creation. I understand the value of science. It pales in comparison to what has been created. Your science will never bring you to the point of being able to create what He already created. It is just child's play by comparison. What you think you see in the fossil record is all there is to your project. You are not going to discover an evolution from one creature alive today into another, new creature. There are no examples of any creature that is in the process of changing into something different. There are only variations and those have been exactly as they are now for thousands of years (since at least the great flood). So, you presuppose your conclusion, independent of the data, and you will dismiss any data that contradicts your model. Not the best way to acquire knowledge in my opinion. We do see evolution occurring today. Changes accumulate every generation. We have evidence that seals were land animals, and they appear to be in the process of becoming more aquatic. A thousand years isn't that long for evolution to take place. It's estimated that lions and house cats diverged from a common ancestor close to 8 million years ago. That's right. Because my religion is not science. I'm not trying to find new ways to doubt my creator. He told us all we need to know to survive on this planet. You can keep searching for what you rink is out there, but it will always come up short, because you're working with the mind of a mere human. One step up from a monkey pushing dirt around with a stick. You'll never be capable of understanding what He knows, even if he wrote it all down and gave it to you. It's too complex. If you need an example, buy your goldfish a book on construction and tell it to build you a house. That's how close you will actually get to understanding what you really think you want to know. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79283235 United States 08/20/2020 07:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) Wow, 4 Creationists having a circle jerk while 99% of scientists continue to accept the validity of evolution. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79198827 Evolution is directly observable. You're not going to make it disappear by playing with math. It is directly observable that evolution is a lie. I don't know what you are talking about. Show me the missing link. Missing link between what? We have about 20 hominin species that are more human-like than any living ape. When we line them up chronologically, the presence of human-like traits increase with time. Brains get bigger, teeth get smaller, arms get shorter etc. You are looking at the corruption of all flesh described in the time before the great flood and interpreting it to mean something it's not. Nothing evolved. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79198827 Australia 08/20/2020 07:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) There is a giant leap in the evolution scale no one can explain. I am convinced we are just a messed up alien experiment missing many DNA strands Quoting: KuvaszLove And that comforts you more than knowing you were specially created by someone who loves you? Some people want the truth even if it's not comforting. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79283235 United States 08/20/2020 07:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) There is a giant leap in the evolution scale no one can explain. I am convinced we are just a messed up alien experiment missing many DNA strands Quoting: KuvaszLove And that comforts you more than knowing you were specially created by someone who loves you? Some people want the truth even if it's not comforting. And you think the truth is that aliens created everything? Who created the aliens? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79198827 Australia 08/20/2020 07:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) Wow, 4 Creationists having a circle jerk while 99% of scientists continue to accept the validity of evolution. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79198827 Evolution is directly observable. You're not going to make it disappear by playing with math. It is directly observable that evolution is a lie. I don't know what you are talking about. Show me the missing link. Missing link between what? We have about 20 hominin species that are more human-like than any living ape. When we line them up chronologically, the presence of human-like traits increase with time. Brains get bigger, teeth get smaller, arms get shorter etc. You are looking at the corruption of all flesh described in the time before the great flood and interpreting it to mean something it's not. Nothing evolved. Says you. Why aren't humans present before these hominins if they are corrupted flesh? Why does the corrupted flesh get closer to human over time? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79198827 Australia 08/20/2020 07:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) There is a giant leap in the evolution scale no one can explain. I am convinced we are just a messed up alien experiment missing many DNA strands Quoting: KuvaszLove And that comforts you more than knowing you were specially created by someone who loves you? Some people want the truth even if it's not comforting. And you think the truth is that aliens created everything? Who created the aliens? I don't think aliens created everything. I was pointing out that you are more concerned with how comforting something is rather than if it's true. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79283235 United States 08/20/2020 07:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) ... Quoting: hollyavila It is directly observable that evolution is a lie. I don't know what you are talking about. Show me the missing link. Missing link between what? We have about 20 hominin species that are more human-like than any living ape. When we line them up chronologically, the presence of human-like traits increase with time. Brains get bigger, teeth get smaller, arms get shorter etc. You are looking at the corruption of all flesh described in the time before the great flood and interpreting it to mean something it's not. Nothing evolved. Says you. Why aren't humans present before these hominins if they are corrupted flesh? Why does the corrupted flesh get closer to human over time? They don't. You just think they do. |
Uzda4s User ID: 77646475 United States 08/20/2020 07:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) This thread again... Why is it so important that you know right NOW if you are the result of two enzymes coming together in primordial soup to bind and form DNA? What in your world would change if you knew all the answers? There are some things that man is just not ment to know... Don't doubt...you're here- so just enjoy yourself, be a good person and help and love others... Even when you don't understand... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79283235 United States 08/20/2020 07:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible) ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79283235 And that comforts you more than knowing you were specially created by someone who loves you? Some people want the truth even if it's not comforting. And you think the truth is that aliens created everything? Who created the aliens? I don't think aliens created everything. I was pointing out that you are more concerned with how comforting something is rather than if it's true. How can you judge that from my statement? You're making an assumption about which I value more from a simple question. It's the same way you perform your science. |