Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible)

I would respect darwinists more if they approached you and said : "in my opinion" or "I believe that". But they don't, they say the "fact" is we started in the water and evolved to be land mammals over several hundred million years. ergo anyone who doesn't believe that are superstitious wack jobs.

The condescension is infuriating. You have some moron that is trying to tell you that the origin of life comes from a bubble puddle that was struck by lightning, produced fish, turned amphibian, reptile, monkey, human. So you're telling me, that we are lightning bubble puddle, monkey fish frogs and that im the crazy one.

GTFO.

And at the bottom of the rat hole, its all so they can run around buggering men without a guilty conscience. Im sorry but you have been lied to, so that you would voluntarily be dehumanized and enslaved.


Jesus said: "You shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free."

Last Edited by musashi777 on 08/20/2020 08:37 AM

I just recently retired, 10 years ago I couldn't have comprehended much of what these men just explained. But in recent years I have told family and friends that Darwin's theory was wrong.
I explained ( in my simplistic way) how failures and restarts made it mathematically impossible (and I'm not good at math) but 10 to the 77th power (1x1077for failure is clearly improbable/ impossible!

Thank you OP for posting this. I'll pass it along.

Evolution happens over much longer periods of time for creatures that live longer and reproduce slower, but if you go to simpler organisms, it is directly observable.

If they were actual Mathematicians then they should be acutely aware of Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem as I am as a Mathematician, that explicitly states God cannot exist. But, I guess they like to cherry pick their logic and "proofs"....

Yawnnzzzz

Lol

“Top” (fill in your favorite specialist here) “prove” (fill in your favorite desperate claim to whatever here) threads are just uncle intel in disguise.

Bullsh!t

Me Darwinist. Me monkey. Oop ooop me want banana.

The Dawn mission to Ceres has revealed, recently, that it is a water-bearing asteroid - the largest one in the asteroid belt.

How did that come to happen?

WELL, it's kinda starting to make sense now that the asteroid belt was once a water-bearing planet in the goldilocks zone..ripe for intelligent human life.

Panspermia dictates that the outer solar system seeds first and so the inner part of the 'goldilocks' zone would seed last.

Meaning that an advanced race of humans very likely inhabited the 5th planet before it met it's demise - a race of humans that were way more advanced that we are today - one that is likely responsible for Earth's great megalithic monuments.

As well as those on Mars and our moon. For surely they were mining the inner solar system.

Time to start putting the pieces together people...with the help of science AND scripture...

What fantasy world are you living in? I just spent hours explaining to you how the model of common ancestry is the most likely explanation, but not 'gospel truth'. It's a fact the oldest animal fossils are aquatic, it's a fact that amphibians appear after fish. All the evidence points to common ancestry.

What fictional darwinist strawman are you imaging?

As for your bizarre theories about evolution and homosexuals, spending all your time 'kneeling before jesus' hasn't seemed to stop countless priests sodomizing men and little boys.

Walk your path, as for me, I walk the path of the Lord.

EE EE OOh OOh! You sky daddy bad! me do the homo!!

Proving once again that MENSA is gay and full of self-flagellating socially inept tards.

Creationists disguised as mathematicians.

What "mathematicians" discussing Darwin who only had a proto-theory of Evolution and NONE of the detailed knowledge and scientific methods discovered in the last 180 years has to do with modern Paleontology and Geology in 2020 I have no idea but it's sounds smart and definitive to the ignorant.

Some people put their faith in fraudsters like Kent Hovind and Carlo Baugh as well.

They'll post the video on their FaceBook page for their friends to show them how Evolution has finally been "debunked".

SECOND LAW OF THERMAL DYNAMICS!!!!!!!!!!!!! REEEEEEEEE!!!!!
ENTROPY!!!!!! REEEEEEE!!!!!!!

Last Edited by TexasPaleo on 08/20/2020 09:07 AM

But no scientist (or Mathematician) can explain how complex DNA evolved from nothing.

Not even Francis Crick can explain it.

Aint nothing random about super symmetry dum dums.

Einstein famously wrote: “Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.” And the year he died, in 1955, a student quoted him as having once said that “I want to know how God created this world.

And he wasn't the only scientific genius who mixed the two knowledges

That's actually pretty witty for a Creationist.

Me Darwinist. Me monkey. My life have no objective meaning, purpose or value. Me no have objective moral code or moral responsibility. Me want banana. Ooop ooop

Einstein did not believe in a personal god, and he referred to the stories in the bible as 'childish.' Young earth Creationists don't mix any knowledge, they just deny, like flat earthers.

Math tells you is 9.
Galapagos

Me priest, me convince peasants that me talk to god, then me take peasant money and fuck their kids.

As a mathematician, could you calculate how big the supposed ark would have been?
To hold every single creature on earth, that ever existed through to currently existing, seeing that apparently, that god made every single thing, and had 2 of each as well. .
from dinosaurs to microscopic organisms.

And then how much room would have been needed to carry all their food? and water of course.

Maybe calculate how long it would take one man with a hand saw and nails to build too.

And how big a forest he would have had to chop down . . with an axe . .

TIA

Fair enough it doesn't he looked to metaphysical explanations for things concerning our creation and life after death

No,they didn't. What they did say is the explosion of life would be very difficult using strict time guidelines. What Darwin didn't know , or anyone else in his time, has filled books. If you care to hear the argument against the math disproving evolution, [link to answers-in-reason.com..]

It doesn't change*

“Evolution is directly observable” has to be one of the funniest damn things I have read in awhile. Thanks for the laugh man.

I mean he's not wrong single cells life forms like bacteria evolve quite rapidly

If evolution existed our bodies and food for our bodies have some kind of imperfection even the appendix plays a role for the fetus in the womb.

The reason there is disease is because humans have been messing and literally fucking with things since the beginning of time.

Its Amazing how when it comes to evolution, that the laws of physics just get thrown out the window.

While evolution is a theory, the laws of physics are NOT.