Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,511 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 258,589
Pageviews Today: 422,378Threads Today: 137Posts Today: 2,419
06:06 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject SAN FRANCISCO'S MASS EXODUS: 53% Of All Storefront Businesses Are Closed Permanently
Poster Handle Paranoid Chick
Post Content
Someone please explain to me:

I thought the elites’ Agenda 2030 program sought to get people OUT of the suburbs and countryside and INTO the cities.

However, all we’ve seen for months now is people FLEEING the big cities in droves. In fact, I hear it’s almost impossible to find a moving truck to rent in NY right now and I’ve read multiple published reports about big city moving companies that are booked for months in advance.

Did the elites’ plan for uber-urbanization blow up in their faces due to the riots and the unconcerned responses of liberal Democrat governors and mayors such as Andrew Cuomo and “Bill De Blasio” (aka Wareen Wilhelm)?
 Quoting: Ken4767


The Dems borrowed too much money from the Chinese, and they couldn't pay it back after Hillary lost, so now the Chinese are calling on the debts. The point is to use these Dem run areas as collateral for those loans.

Think about it...NYC is having a real estate market crash, and real estate was PRIME in NYC. Now it can be bought up for pennies on the dollar by the Chinese. California sits on natural resource reserves. The wildfires kept starting in areas with known gold deposits (this was the tell, along with the Train to Nowhere for Billions) a few years ago. Now, the same real estate crash is going on in San Francisco and rich LA areas, and the Chinese will buy that up just as they will do in NYC.

Also pay attention to the riots going on in these port cities. Even the areas inland/north (Minnesota, Chicago, etc), that aren't 'port cities' along the coast, are still 'port cities' along the Great Lakes, St. Lawrence, etc. This is akin to Victoria in Australia leasing their strategic port for 99 years to the Chinese. These are National Security issues, as ports should NEVER be leased to foreign countries. Remember when LBC port was leased by the Chinese?
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP