BUILDING 7 WAS NOT HIT FELL AT FREE FALL SPEED INTO ITS OWN FOOT PRINT

Also to divert attention from the missing trillions reported by defence secretary rumsfeld, just one day prior on 9 - 10.

What is it that you don't understand about building 7. A wasre basket caught on fire and then the desk above it.........then the building fell down.......SIMPLE!

I believe the reason was that they were to expensive to maintain.

[link to www.nist.gov (secure)]

fireproof passports, missing trillions, norad stand down

Please just read this before you start ranting about controlled demolition.

We get it spambot, you really believe the official story.

Most of us wiped our ass with that years ago.

There isn't enough honest people with absolute power to not have something made up to justify the destruction.

WTC 7 is not mentioned even once in the 9/11 Commission Report, therefore it never existed in the first place. Nothing to see here.

No, a new substance called nanothermite was used to take the buildings down. It is a much slower and hence quieter explosion/incendiary. And it gives off more heat per lb.

This stuff was brought in on the night shifts in the month leading up to 9-11. The elevator refurbishment project gave them full access to the support columns to plant the charges.

Nano-thermite leaves reaction products, all of which were found in the WTC dust.

It produced tiny molten iron microspheres, (spherical, because the molten microdrops freeze in mid air from the explosion, producing shperes from surface tension.

They also found unexploded bits of nanothermite, which reacted exothermically in the lab.

The also found the characteristic carbon nanotubes froduced by nanothermite in the lungs of the first responders who were treated at Mt. Sinai Hospital.

There was another chemical found as well, but I would have to look it up, that is used in the sol-gel manufacturing process.

Only the US military had the technology to make this stuff.

PNAC planned and conducted the attacks.

Silverstein had just bought the property, which needed to be demolished to get rid of all the asbestos. He insured it to the hilt. He had breakfast every morning at his office in the WTC, but was mysteriously absent that day.

Yeah, there is that too. Win/Win for the perps.

the most resounding proof was presented by Prof. Neils Harrit, showing that the dust from the WTC samples contained nanothermite.

And after thinking about all of the evidence, I took it one step further.

You see, the debris remained at molten steel temperatures even a whole month after the towers collapsed. In chemistry, we learned about Le Chatelier's principle.

Exothermic reactions proceed more slowly as the heat is allowed to build up. Once the temperature reaches a critical temperature, the reaction reaches a dynamic equilibrium, until the reaction cools a bit, then a bit more chemical reaction occurs to maintain that peak temperature. This is the ONLY possible explanation for a 30 day persistence of such temperatures.

Burning jet fuel (kerosene), cannot melt steel or leave pools of molten steel in the debris pile.

Tons of nanothermite had been loaded into towers 1, 2 and 7 in the month leading up to 9-11, during the overnight shifts when crews were doing an elevator upgrade project, which gave them full access to the interior support columns to plant the beam cutting nanothermite charges.

the impact of 2 planes and the fuel took down the twin towers.

that skyscraper must have had termites real bad.

You need to watch the videos and do some reseach. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to pulverize steel and concrete into dust....sorry physics dont support your statement

Were there people in building 7.

the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania?

Someone said the Towers had no floors and was hollow. So apparently it was just a matter of time before it collapsed in freefall and turned to dust.

Apparently building 7 was made of cardboard and pipe cleaners. Whoever constructed a building that gets hit by debris, catches on fire and then collapses like a demolition, needs to be reprimanded harshly.

The heat from the uncontrolled fires caused steel floor beams and girders to thermally expand, leading to a chain of events that caused a key structural column to fail. The failure of this structural column then initiated a fire-induced progressive collapse of the entire building.

According to the report's probable collapse sequence, heat from the uncontrolled fires caused thermal expansion of the steel beams on the lower floors of the east side of WTC 7, damaging the floor framing on multiple floors.

Eventually, a girder on Floor 13 lost its connection to a critical column, Column 79, that provided support for the long floor spans on the east side of the building (see Diagram 1). The displaced girder and other local fire-induced damage caused Floor 13 to collapse, beginning a cascade of floor failures down to the 5th floor. Many of these floors had already been at least partially weakened by the fires in the vicinity of Column 79. This collapse of floors left Column 79 insufficiently supported in the east-west direction over nine stories.

Right out of the Nist BS report. This is about Building 7 not the towers...

Whenever I stand in a large building now I seriously think....if 9/11 was for real, then this fucking place could just collapse any moment. For real.

If the people that believe that horseshit after watching how the towers and building fell REALLY believe it, then they must be sweating like mad anytime they are in a tall building.

The unsupported Column 79 then buckled and triggered an upward progression of floor system failures that reached the building's east penthouse. What followed in rapid succession was a series of structural failures. Failure first occurred all the way to the roof line—involving all three interior columns on the easternmost side of the building (79, 80, and 81). Then, progressing from east to west across WTC 7, all of the columns failed in the core of the building (58 through 78). Finally, the entire façade collapsed.

The probable collapse sequence is described in NIST NCSTAR Report 1A, Section 2.4 and NIST NCSTAR Report 1-9, Chapter 13.

NIST is bullshit...and debunked by architects for truth on 911.

I feel like 911 was our generation's Pearl Harbor. It was done to be able to declare war. In this case the middle east.

There are many suspicious things that happened before the attacks. Wasnt all the gold stored below the towers removed before the attack?

you obviously have never done any forging of steel.
steel bends quite nicely at temperatures will below
the melting point. which would bend and compromise the
structural integrity of those upper floors
enough to cause the break-up and Pancaking that started from
the area of the planes' impacts and Pancaked downwards from there.

the Controlled Demolition of Bdg. 7 is an entirely different ball of wax.
the explosion occurred at the bottom, which started
the Pancaking at the bottom, taking down Bdg. 7 from there.

let it go. yer tilting at windmills.
you'll do better to search for the girl in the polka dot dress
at the Robert Kennedy assassination.

Do you not realize the amount of control that was installed into all facets of life because of that day?

Not to mention all the money made.

There are a ton of reasons this could have been done. The thing is, just because we do not know all the details doesn't invalidate all the problems with the "official story".

It's absolutely insane to think we have actually been told what happened that day. There is proof there was at least talk of a large attack incoming so to say it was a complete surprise is itself not true.

No matter the level of knowledge we have most definitely not been told anywhere near the whole story. Now there are reports of all the lies about how we recovered info in Guantanamo through torture when in reality the torture stopped the flow of info.

We are NEVER told the truth, there are so many instances of complete different things happening than the version we are told. Everything about the official story is sanitized and twisted for the best possible propaganda to pass the laws they want.

The crazy phone calls from the hijacked planes, building 7, the downed flight, and so many other things that don't add up about that day. We were told nothing real.

the only suspicious thing at the World Trade Center Site
was the Controlled Demolition of Building 7.

If the official narrative is true, than all buildings should be one floor, two at most, and tall buildings are all declared deathtraps and torn down.

What are the odds that these buildings would all do exactly the same thing even though they were "damaged" at different places?

Like the guy above said, heat could definitely weaken steel.

it's all bullshit. No fucking way all three buildings fall like that, sections of the damaged building would fall to the sides at the very least and quite possibly the structure could buckle to one side and an upper section fall to the side.

No fucking way all three buildings collapse straight down in free fall. No fucking way.

And yes I have a bit of knowledge on the subjects of physics, mechanics, and structural engineering.