Ivermectin protects against Covid19 and successfully cures it. Safer than a vaccine. Updates

Yes they certainly did.

Thanks for sharing more proof.

The world is run by some real bastards.

Works on cows, too....Published in peer-reviewed journal.

Free link:
[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)]
Ivermectin also inhibits the replication of bovine respiratory viruses (BRSV, BPIV-3, BoHV-1, BCoV and BVDV) in vitro

pdf:
[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)]

Journal Virus Research (paid link):
[link to www.sciencedirect.com (secure)]

When I bought my ivermectin last January, I was surprised to see that it was shipped from Ukraine. It arrived after my Covid was over, so I never took any yet.

better video than before..
Ivm for RSV.
Also cures cows of BVDV.

Sorry I am a little late on this and there is already a GLP thread on the topic Thread: A Timeline of Major Battles in the Global War on Ivermectin - but I think it should be documented here, too...

I know it's a long read, and we already know the answer (IVM works & is very safe ), but DAMN this man was right all along, and the pharma co's and big money (Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) have criminally conspired to prevent us from knowing/using it.

A Timeline of Major Battles In the Global War on Ivermectin
=============================================================​=

NB: I, personally, (S-man) was fobbed off by my own country's regulator with THIS (failed) ARGUMENT:

"In June 2020, the first Pharma hit men (Craig Rayner) start writing letters to the editor of prominent medical journals injecting doubt to anyone who might infer human efficacy based on the in-vitro Monash study."

"Note the letter literally founded the first anti-ivermectin 'narrative' that 'standard dosing could never achieve the effective concentrations reached in the Monash University study.' Total nonsense"

----

APRIL 2020 - NOBEL PRIZE WINNING DISCOVERER OF IVERMECTIN ASKS MERCK FOR SUPPORT IN STUDYING IVERMECTIN’s EFFICACY IN COVID
"He (Satoshi Omura) politely wrote to Merck for funds to study its clinical efficacy in Covid.
So Merck refused to study ivermectin from the get-go."


-------

JUNE 2020 - THE WHO, BMGF, AND UNITAID HIRE A TEAM OF RESEARCHERS TO STUDY AVAILABLE, REPURPOSED DRUGS IN COVID
"Unitaid’s ActCellerator Program (staffed and run by BMGF) hired Dr. Andrew Hill (NB: Hill admitted on video that UNITAID/BMGF changed his paper's conclusions - thanks to Tess Lawrie) to lead a research team to identify any repurposed drugs effective in Covid.

"I will say at the outset that, by the end of these posts, I will have provided enough evidence to support my assertion that this team was not deployed to find and disseminate evidence of effective generic drugs, but rather to report that evidence back to its funders so they could deploy Disinformation to destroy them".



MUCH MORE AT LINK... [link to pierrekory.substack.com (secure)]

New study...

IVERMECTIN...72% reduction in SARS2 infection
========================================
(pssst: that's just the first good effect!)
[link to www.medincell.com (secure)]
"Note: this publication is not a recommendation to use ivermectin against Covid-19."


UNITAID
======
Note: Medincell is sponsored by UNITAID.

https://twitter.com/_/status/161127820263020134​6

Remember: UNITAID was named by Andrew Hill as changing his conclusions in a pivotal WHO-Ivermectin study in 2021.
Video:- [link to rumble.com (secure)]
Transcript:- [link to childrenshealthdefense.org (secure)]

Guess what? UNITAID is a BIG recipient of funds from Bill Gates, and following Andrew's changed conclusions, his university got a $40mm grant from Gates: [link to www.worldtribune.com (secure)]


MEDINCELL/IVERMECTIN NEWS ARTICLE:
==================================
[link to www.biospace.com (secure)]
MedinCell announces positive results for the SAIVE clinical study in prevention of Covid-19 infection in a contact-based population
Published: Jan 05, 2023
"The study conducted in 399 participants met its primary efficacy endpoint with a reduction of 72% of COVID-19 infection in the group treated with daily oral administration of ivermectin compared to the placebo group."

"Ivermectin administered for 28 days demonstrated acceptable safety and tolerability without any unexpected safety signals."

"Note: this publication is not a recommendation to use ivermectin against Covid-19."

Last Edited by S-man on 01/06/2023 07:34 AM

Discusses using IVM and HCQ for vaxx/covid damage

[link to discernreport.com (secure)]

Cable TV Channel "Choice TV"
Programme "Choice News Now" in St-Lucia, W. Indies.
[link to m.facebook.com (secure)]

Dr. Gilbertha St Rose (she was fined for prescribing Ivermectin):

"Our Government is not doing what it should for the health of our people"

"The [St. Lucia] medical and dental council should be advocating for the stoppage of this COVID injection, which a lot of us know has been a clinical trial which went through without regular recomenndations."

"It's not too late to put a stop to it while the investigation will go... now we see the effect of this injection... who hasn't died suddenly is dying slowly and we don't know what is to come - autoimmune diseases, inflammatory condtions and the waking up of other infections"

"Almost two years later the evidence is there that Ivermectin is a wonderful drug"

"Although it is also good for treating and preventing COVID, research is now showing it is very effective against RSV, and more importantly against the adverse effects of the COVID injection"

Last Edited by S-man on 02/02/2023 08:50 AM

Well, Well, Well...
..do we get to say we told you so, yet?
..but of course, THEY KNEW it worked all along.
Crime Against Humanity.
Knowingly executed.


Journal: Nature, The Journal of Antibiotics
===========================================
[link to www.nature.com (secure)]
Published: 25 April 2023
Prophylactic administration of ivermectin attenuates SARS-CoV-2 induced disease in a Syrian Hamster Model

From the paper above... remember, this is prophylaxis...

"Viral titers in the lungs of ivermectin-treated hamsters were reduced by a factor of 10 compared to vehicle-treated hamsters on day 3 after infection"

Truth...

https://twitter.com/_/status/1655663296081436685

Robert F. Kennedy Jr
@RobertKennedyJr
May 8
Replying to @VPrasadMDMPH
Dear Vinay,

I'd like to challenge you on your claims regarding HCQ and ivermectin. There has been a great deal of fraud in the analysis of these two drugs for COVID. I imagine this is hard to believe, but perhaps after all the false claims and illogical public health measures taken during the pandemic, you can have an open mind regarding what I have to say.

Three of the largest HCQ clinical trials were designed to fail. Together, the 3 trials gave HCQ to 2,549 hospitalized patients, who were nearly half of all those entered in late treatment trials of HCQ. These were the Solidarity, Recovery, and REMAP (Higgins et al.) trials. Using death as the endpoint, all 3 had considerably higher death rates in the HCQ group than in the standard care group.

Why was this? Because the patients were given excessive, dangerous doses of HCQ, doses that have never been considered therapeutic for any condition. Interestingly, all 3 trials cited above used the identical HCQ doses and dosing schedule.

The dose was 800 mg at T=0, then 400 mg each at 6, 12, and 18 hours, then 400 mg every 12 hours for a total 10 days of treatment.

Please look up this dose and see if you think it was safe, particularly when all the REMAP patients were in the ICU, and there was no dosage adjustment for weight or comorbidities.

In case you still are unconvinced, a study in Brazil of excessive doses of chloroquine (CQ) by Borba et al. quickly revealed it was killing patients, and the trial of high dose CQ had to be ended prematurely, as detailed in the JAMA:

[link to jamanetwork.com (secure)]

Question: How safe and effective are 2 different regimens of chloroquine diphosphate in the treatment of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?

Findings: In this phase IIb randomized clinical trial of 81 patients with COVID-19, an unplanned interim analysis recommended by an independent data safety and monitoring board found that a higher dosage of chloroquine diphosphate for 10 days was associated with more toxic effects and lethality, particularly affecting QTc interval prolongation. The limited sample size did not allow the study to show any benefit overall regarding treatment efficacy.

Meaning: The preliminary findings from the CloroCovid-19 trial suggest that higher dosage of chloroquine should not be recommended for the treatment of severe COVID-19, especially among patients also receiving azithromycin and oseltamivir, because of safety concerns regarding QTc interval prolongation and increased lethality.

When you remove these 3 HCQ trials from a meta-analysis of HCQ (+/- CQ) you find the medication was very beneficial. Leaving them in, still some meta-analyses find efficacy. Here is another meta-analysis of HCQ RCTs:

[link to c19hcq.org (secure)]

While no ivermectin trials overdosed patients, there were a number of suspicious issues with the COVID ivermectin studies. A meta-analysis by Andrew Hill had its conclusions adjusted shortly before publication. This was detailed in part by Dr. Tess Lawrie and discussed in my book, “The Real Anthony Fauci.” Phil Harper did a deeper forensic dive later and identified other people who participated in changing the paper's conclusions.

There were many serious questions raised about the conduct of the Together trial, the Lopez-Medina trial, and others. There is so much more to this story, and I would be happy to share more information, or put you in touch with other doctors who have written about the frauds in detail. Finally, here is another meta-analysis for ivermectin:

[link to c19ivm.org (secure)]

Best wishes,

RFK, Jr.

Last Edited by S-man on 05/10/2023 11:04 AM

They knew Ivermectin worked, it was published, too. In September 2020.
Note: 3CLPro is the key enzyme SARS2 uses to build itself inside cells...

[link to www.nature.com (secure)]
"Our results indicate that boceprevir, ombitasvir, paritaprevir, tipranavir, ivermectin, and micafungin exhibited inhibitory effect towards 3CLpro enzymatic activity."

"Interestingly, as shown in Fig. 4, out of 13 OTDs only ivermectin completely blocked (>80%) the 3CLpro activity at 50µM concentration"


Last Edited by S-man on 05/24/2023 09:37 AM

and of course Dr Fauci knew this. The WHO knew, Gates knew it, and Bourla also knew. They are all killers..

AND the media was complicit.

This was DEFINITELY a crime against humanity and I'm looking forward to the day of the trials.

I think this belongs here..

Bump

Here's a list of places to buy IVM (as well as HCQ, antibiotics, and most other generic meds), no Rx required.

Thread: SOURCES FOR IVERMECTIN (pill form, no Rx) and most other generic meds

Ivermectin .
Are there interactions with, alcohol, medical mj?
Anyone have experience or info relating to interaction cautions?

I am taking ivermectin and find it is helping with long COVID symptoms. Especially brain fog.

So you still refuse to accept there is no Covid-19 after three years of arguing? What's the point in the discussion if you still base it on a false premise?

Try to grasp it. They released a mild Bio weapon, which made millions mildly sick. They then started telling people with normal colds and flu they had a "virus" called "covid19".

There is no such thing.

At that point the discussion is futile because you still base it on a "scientific" premise that's false.

It was a false flag event, a Trojan horse. I don't even bother to try to open a discussion with someone who doesn't understand that by now, it's a waste of time. If you believe there was a Cov19 you'll believe the next scam and the next Fauci..

[link to threadreaderapp.com (secure)]

15 year old boy sought my help after suffering for months with an itchy rash all over his body following the Pfizer shots.

IVM cured him

I would read through the FLCCC website to see if it mentions drug interactions. ANd also just google search the same question on the internet.

But given that at least a billion doses were given to those living in Africa, I would say that casual drug interactions are not an issue, or there would be a half billion dead Africans. :)

The main risk, is froa defect in the blood - brain barrier, possibly from meningitus or some physical insult to the barrier.

Yes, Covid is a coronavirus. Probably weaponized in a lab. Likely escaped from the Wuhan lab, that Fauci poured US tax dollars into to create the "gain of function" virus.

They certainly exxagerated the risks from the virus, but it is a virus. Like other coronavirii, that cause the common cold, they mutate very quickly, making a vaccine approach to containment a fool's errand, even if they had a proper vaccine for it, which they clearly didn't.

The bio-engineered virus, and the "vaccine", were designed to thin out the number of humans, enrich the drug companies, and give government emergency powers to usher us in to this latest circle of Hell.

Many conspiracy theories are true. That does not mean they all are.

Our government planned and executed 9-11. OUr government killed JFK. Pretty sure we did not land on the Moon. Probably at most did a fly-by / orbit for the time in question would be my guess.

Some people have bought into the "Covid is not a virus" conspiracy and I know that no argument on the face of the Earth will dissuade you or them. And I have no reason to care what you believe other than the mild annoyance of having to listen to the assertions. Be well and all the best. I will still buy you a beer if we ever meet. :)

Last Edited by JustmeTX on 09/16/2023 02:14 AM

.

NO beer for you.

State an opinion. Say something useful, or go sit in the corner.

Last Edited by JustmeTX on 09/16/2023 10:02 AM

bump

I would go this route to get ivermectin... if that was something I felt I needed:



"This is how easy it is to get ivermectin, the dewormer drug that conspiracists say cures COVID-19"

"After doing a little research to make sure Push Health wasn't a take-my-money-and-leave scam (by the way, I don't recommend using the platform for anything), I decided to move forward and pay $65 for a consultation to follow my curiosity.

On Push's site, I filled in information about my local pharmacy — where I'd pick up my prescription. Then I typed in basic information about myself, like birthday, contact information, and home address. The next part asked me what type of medication I wanted, and the reason I wanted it. I simply typed "ivermectin" and then "Covid."

After submitting my patient information and paying for a future virtual consultation, I was told via email that I'd be "matched" with a provider in 24-48 hours. But only three hours later, I was matched with a doctor who allegedly went to New York Medical College; and there was no video consultation, just word that I had been issued a prescription that read as follows:

Prescription(s)

1)ivermectin 3 MG Oral Tablet. take 4.5 tablets daily for 5 days. #: 23 Tablet, Refills: 0.

2)doxycycline hyclate 100 MG Oral Capsule. Take 1 capsule BID for 10 days. #: 20 Capsule, Refills: 0."

(less than 50%)

Source: [link to www.salon.com (secure)]

I would go this route to get ivermectin... if that was something I felt I needed:



"This is how easy it is to get ivermectin, the dewormer drug that conspiracists say cures COVID-19"

"After doing a little research to make sure Push Health wasn't a take-my-money-and-leave scam (by the way, I don't recommend using the platform for anything), I decided to move forward and pay $65 for a consultation to follow my curiosity.

On Push's site, I filled in information about my local pharmacy — where I'd pick up my prescription. Then I typed in basic information about myself, like birthday, contact information, and home address. The next part asked me what type of medication I wanted, and the reason I wanted it. I simply typed "ivermectin" and then "Covid."

After submitting my patient information and paying for a future virtual consultation, I was told via email that I'd be "matched" with a provider in 24-48 hours. But only three hours later, I was matched with a doctor who allegedly went to New York Medical College; and there was no video consultation, just word that I had been issued a prescription that read as follows:

Prescription(s)

1)ivermectin 3 MG Oral Tablet. take 4.5 tablets daily for 5 days. #: 23 Tablet, Refills: 0.

2)doxycycline hyclate 100 MG Oral Capsule. Take 1 capsule BID for 10 days. #: 20 Capsule, Refills: 0."

(less than 50%)

Source: [link to www.salon.com (secure)]