| Users Online Now: 1,568 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 55,729 | |
| Pageviews Today: 118,002 | Threads Today: 72 | Posts Today: 973 |
| 01:13 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,568 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 55,729 | |
| Pageviews Today: 118,002 | Threads Today: 72 | Posts Today: 973 |
| 01:13 AM | ||
Barack Obama: "The need for a ninth justice is undeniably clear. #DoYourJob" | |
dr0id
 User ID: 77709862  United States09/19/2020 04:48 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78935699 United States09/19/2020 04:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And yet McConnell won that fight. If the winner doesn't abide by the rule that he himself used to win, he is no longer a winner but a cheater. We all know that is true. We learned it in kindergarten. If children can play fairly and with integrity, what a disgrace it is when adults do not. |
| dr0id
(OP) User ID: 77709862 United States09/19/2020 04:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And yet McConnell won that fight. If the winner doesn't abide by the rule that he himself used to win, he is no longer a winner but a cheater. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78935699 We all know that is true. We learned it in kindergarten. If children can play fairly and with integrity, what a disgrace it is when adults do not. 1. Winning a fight does not equal being a cheater. 2. There is no rule in the first place. There's the Joe Biden 'rule'. (Though still not a real rule.) https://imgur.com/a/5fE6O0E[link to imgur.com (secure)] Also, by your own standards, aren't you saying Democrats are cheaters by going against their own 'rule'? Numerous quotes by top Democrats supporting electing a new Justice in an election year. (Source: Links below 'Related'.) Last Edited by dr0id on 09/19/2020 04:58 PM Articles posted do not necessarily reflect endorsement. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78935699 United States09/19/2020 04:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And yet McConnell won that fight. If the winner doesn't abide by the rule that he himself used to win, he is no longer a winner but a cheater. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78935699 We all know that is true. We learned it in kindergarten. If children can play fairly and with integrity, what a disgrace it is when adults do not. 1. Winning a fight does not equal being a cheater. 2. There is no rule in the first place. There's the Joe Biden 'rule'. (Though still not a real rule.) [imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)] [link to imgur.com (secure)] Both Graham and McConnell explicitly stated that they wished to be held accountable to the new precedent (thus rule) they, themselves set. Their lack of integrity is what they now use to confound the masses and manipulate their supporters into becoming one with the same corruption they are filled with. A man is only as good as his word. |
| dr0id
(OP) User ID: 77709862 United States09/19/2020 05:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Both Graham and McConnell explicitly stated that they wished to be held accountable to the new precedent (thus rule) they, themselves set. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78935699 Their lack of integrity is what they now use to confound the masses and manipulate their supporters into becoming one with the same corruption they are filled with. A man is only as good as his word. So Republicans should be held accountable for what they said but Democrats should not? You just created a double standard. You are the 'cheater'. Thanks for exposing yourself. "It's okay when Democrats do it." sums up your argument. Last Edited by dr0id on 09/19/2020 05:01 PM Articles posted do not necessarily reflect endorsement. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78935699 United States09/19/2020 05:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And yet McConnell won that fight. If the winner doesn't abide by the rule that he himself used to win, he is no longer a winner but a cheater. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78935699 We all know that is true. We learned it in kindergarten. If children can play fairly and with integrity, what a disgrace it is when adults do not. 1. Winning a fight does not equal being a cheater. 2. There is no rule in the first place. There's the Joe Biden 'rule'. (Though still not a real rule.) [imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)] [link to imgur.com (secure)] Also, by your own standards, aren't you saying Democrats are cheaters by going against their own 'rule'? Numerous quotes by top Democrats supporting electing a new Justice in an election year. (Source: Links below 'Related'.) It is not a competition of who is worse and this new standard of operation is the lighter fuel on the heaping pile of trash this nation is becoming. We are dealing with ONE issue here and the integrity of ONE party. In a different thread, about a different topic, I would be happy to discuss the Democrats. But this is not a competition of who is worse, and to confound it as such does you, me, and the entire nation a disservice. |
| dr0id
(OP) User ID: 77709862 United States09/19/2020 05:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We are dealing with ONE issue here and the integrity of ONE party. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78935699 Yes, you already made it clear you wish for things to be one sided. Demanding that we only look at one side? I don't see how that helps your case. FACT: Many top Democrats were very clear that they believe a new Justice should be voted on in an election year. Even Ginsburg herself. Obama, Hillary, Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, and the list goes on. Last Edited by dr0id on 09/19/2020 05:09 PM Articles posted do not necessarily reflect endorsement. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78935699 United States09/19/2020 05:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We are dealing with ONE issue here and the integrity of ONE party. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78935699 Yes, you already made it clear you wish for things to be one sided. Demanding that we only look at one side? I don't see how that helps your case. FACT: Many top Democrats were very clear that they believe a new Justice should be voted on in an election year. Obama, Hillary, Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, and the list goes on. And who won that fight? If we don't play by the rules that produce winners, would you rather go back to the standards set by the losers? Clearly McConnell's ideals back in 2016 were the "winning" ideals, as they won the fight. To remove that ideal now is to go backwards into embracing the ideals of the "losers." Sounds very de-evolutionary to me, and it is de-evolution for selfish reasons at that. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79396622 United States09/19/2020 05:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| dr0id
(OP) User ID: 77709862 United States09/19/2020 05:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And who won that fight? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78935699 If we don't play by the rules that produce winners, would you rather go back to the standards set by the losers? Clearly McConnell's ideals back in 2016 were the "winning" ideals, as they won the fight. To remove that ideal now is to go backwards into embracing the ideals of the "losers." Sounds very de-evolutionary to me, and it is de-evolution for selfish reasons at that. So your argument is we should not listen to the losers. The losers in this case are Democrats. Good point: people should stop listening to the Democrats and their claims. Funny enough, that probably means according to you people shouldn't be listening to you either.  After the Democrats lost while trying to frame and sabotage and incoming President with 'cheating', now they want to complain about cheating? Good one. But you're right: time to stop listening to those losers. Their complaints are invalid. Articles posted do not necessarily reflect endorsement. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78935699 United States09/19/2020 05:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And who won that fight? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78935699 If we don't play by the rules that produce winners, would you rather go back to the standards set by the losers? Clearly McConnell's ideals back in 2016 were the "winning" ideals, as they won the fight. To remove that ideal now is to go backwards into embracing the ideals of the "losers." Sounds very de-evolutionary to me, and it is de-evolution for selfish reasons at that. So your argument is we should not listen to the losers. The losers in this case are Democrats. Good point: people should stop listening to the Democrats and their claims. Funny enough, that probably means according to you people shouldn't be listening to you either. After the Democrats lost while trying to frame and sabotage and incoming President with 'cheating', now they want to complain about cheating? Good one. But you're right: time to stop listening to those losers. Their complaints are invalid. You also do not play in good faith. You are not stupid and you know that I was talking about one topic and one fight in which the Democrats lost and the Republicans won. Again, this is something you should have learned in kindergarten, but being a sore winner is just about the most despicable thing a man can do. I know you're enjoying this fantasy that I'm a Democrat and you're really owning me, but that is not the case. I am neither Republican nor Democrat. I am enthusiastically for any man or women who plays the game with integrity, honesty, and good natured tenacity to make the world a more enjoyable, peaceful place for all of its inhabitants. I have very few biases when it comes to policy or trying new things. I will vote any party that exhibits the traits I admire most dearly. The only thing I care about is playing fairly, with integrity, and with honor to the post one has been elected by and for the people into. In this regard, your boys are a failure in my eyes. Nothing will change that. They have truly shown their inability to govern in good faith. |
| Jake
User ID: 77849624 United States09/19/2020 05:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | you heard him Trump, Appoint 3 more Evil controls the ignorant... Climate change is a hoax so is the vax you have been fear-porned into compliance! Definition Satan from the bible: Satan (Rev 12:7) exercising his subtle (indirect) impact on heathen governments (powers) – i.e. accomplishing his hellish agenda from "behind the scenes." |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28698215 United States09/19/2020 05:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79258672  United Kingdom09/19/2020 05:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And yet McConnell won that fight. If the winner doesn't abide by the rule that he himself used to win, he is no longer a winner but a cheater. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78935699 We all know that is true. We learned it in kindergarten. If children can play fairly and with integrity, what a disgrace it is when adults do not. Not one person with at least 2 brain cells cares what you think or feel. Besides, Trump will win another 4 more years and you'll figure out something else to cry about. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 44333138 United States09/19/2020 06:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Vicious Deplorable dollop
You ain't seen nothing yet! User ID: 74941146 United States09/19/2020 07:40 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Obama Argued in 2016 on Need to Fill Open SCOTUS Slot IMMEDIATELY! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 44333138 Kamala Harris is not a Natural Born Citizen. She's illegally running. Used by the Founders... Book I of The Law of Nations, Chapter XIX, § 212 (Joseph Chitty numbering) – “Citizens and natives” reads: 'The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.' 1758 Emerich de Vattel Oh' What the Hell, do I look like I want to die in some nursing home one day... America must have 4 new Constitutional Amendments... 1. Drug Tests and Mental Evaluations on all politicians and judges randomly five times per year. 2. Term Limits for Federal politicians and judges. 3. Mental and health standards for Supreme Court Justices and retirement age set. 4. A 'Star Chamber' of elected Natural Born Citizens (no attorney's) to ivestigate, try, and prosecute the politicians and government employee's as they see fit. Mandatory death penalty by public hanging is the merciful sentence for pedos and their associates. Democrats are a WMD, literally. Let Justice Be Done Though The Heavens Fall. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79132049 United States09/19/2020 07:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Vicious Deplorable dollop
You ain't seen nothing yet! User ID: 74941146 United States09/19/2020 07:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's What RBG Said About Filling a SCOTUS Vacancy in an Election Year BY MATT MARGOLIS SEP 19, 2020 11:37 AM EST AP Photo/Rebecca Gibian As the debate over what to do about the vacancy on the Supreme Court is only getting started, perhaps we should heed the advice of the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg herself as to what to do. When a similar scenario occurred four years ago, following the death of Antonin Scalia, the Republican-controlled Senate blocked Barack Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court. It was a controversial move, and Ginsburg had something to say about it: Ginsburg publicly called on the Senate to go through with the nomination. “That’s their job,” she said in July 2016. “There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the President stops being President in his last year.” “Eight is not a good number for a collegial body that sometimes disagrees,” Ginsburg said on the issue a few months later during an event at the Smithsonian Museum of American History in Washington. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who was with her, agreed. “I think we hope there will be nine as quickly as possible.” [link to pjmedia.com (secure)] Kamala Harris is not a Natural Born Citizen. She's illegally running. Used by the Founders... Book I of The Law of Nations, Chapter XIX, § 212 (Joseph Chitty numbering) – “Citizens and natives” reads: 'The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.' 1758 Emerich de Vattel Oh' What the Hell, do I look like I want to die in some nursing home one day... America must have 4 new Constitutional Amendments... 1. Drug Tests and Mental Evaluations on all politicians and judges randomly five times per year. 2. Term Limits for Federal politicians and judges. 3. Mental and health standards for Supreme Court Justices and retirement age set. 4. A 'Star Chamber' of elected Natural Born Citizens (no attorney's) to ivestigate, try, and prosecute the politicians and government employee's as they see fit. Mandatory death penalty by public hanging is the merciful sentence for pedos and their associates. Democrats are a WMD, literally. Let Justice Be Done Though The Heavens Fall. |
| dr0id
(OP) User ID: 77709862 United States09/19/2020 07:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You also do not play in good faith. You are not stupid and you know that I was talking about one topic and one fight in which the Democrats lost and the Republicans won. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78935699 Yeah, I already covered this. Your argument boils down to "Look at what the Republicans are doing!!!" "But don't you bring up the things Democrats did which are many times worse!!! BAD FAITH!!! NOT FAIR!!!" "Reason? Because they are losers!" In other words, ridiculous. But amusing. I'll give you that. The only thing I care about is playing fairly, with integrity, and with honor to the post one has been elected by and for the people into. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78935699 Then there is absolutely no way you could support Democrats with their spying, lying (about Russia and many other things), the list is really just too long.... if you yourself had any integrity. But I suspect all the lying, spying, cheating, rioting, murdering, looting, arson, and on and on, doesn't bother your 'integrity' much at all. So much for "good faith". All of this because you can't even face the fact that Democrats strongly supported voting in a new Justice in an election year and have to invent convoluted excuses and rules. Good faith... https://imgur.com/a/vUQvHFT[link to imgur.com (secure)] Last Edited by dr0id on 09/19/2020 07:51 PM Articles posted do not necessarily reflect endorsement. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79396622 United States09/19/2020 09:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Then there is absolutely no way you could support Democrats Quoting: dr0id with their spying, lying (about Russia and many other things), the list is really just too long.... if you yourself had any integrity. But I suspect all the lying, spying, cheating, rioting, murdering, looting, arson, and on and on, doesn't bother your 'integrity' much at all. |
