Thoughts on Covid-19 - The Great Reset

[link to www.bibliotecapleyades.net (secure)]

heir view is that before Covid-19 took hold, a,

'broken sense of normalcy prevailed'.

The situation now is that the virus,

'marks a fundamental inflection point in our global trajectory.'

In a very short space of time it,

'magnified the fault lines that beset our economies and societies'.

If it was not already obvious, then the authors confirm over the last few pages of the book that the United Nations' Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development program is intertwined with the Great Reset.



This is evident when studying the WEF's Strategic Intelligence unit.

Sustainable Development and the Great Reset go hand in hand.

For Agenda 2030 to be implemented successfully, Schwab and Malleret offer an alternative to the possibility of countries failing to come together.



As you might expect, it revolves around collaboration and cooperation. In their eyes no progress can otherwise be made.



Covid-19 offers the opportunity to,

'embed greater societal equality and sustainability into the recovery'.

And, crucially, this would,

'accelerate rather than delay progress towards 2030 Sustainable Development Goals'.

But it does not end simply with the full implementation of Agenda 2030.



Schwab and Malleret want to go further.



Their aim is that the open exposure of weaknesses within existing global infrastructure,

'may compel us to act faster by replacing failed institutions, processes and rules with new ones that are better suited to current and future needs.'

To convey the importance of this statement, the authors state that this alone is 'the essence of the Great Reset'.



What they appear to be seeking is global transformation where systems and the age of the algorithm take precedent over political institutions.



We are already beginning to see moves by major global institutions like,

the Trilateral Commission

the World Trade Organization

the European Union,

...to 'reform' and 'rejuvenate' both their work and membership.



Covid-19 has undoubtedly straightened the hand of global planners and their quest for reformation.

As 'Covid-19 - The Great Reset' was published, it was accompanied by an article written by Schwab and Malleret, called, 'COVID-19's legacy - This is how to get the Great Reset right', they stated plainly that not only will a lot of things change forever, 'the worst of the pandemic is yet to come':

Indeed, no industry or business will be able to avoid the impact of the changes ahead.



Either they adapt to fit in with the Great Reset agenda (assuming they have the resources to do so), or they will not survive.



According to Schwab and Malleret, 'millions of companies risk disappearing', whilst only 'a few' e.g. corporate monoliths, will be strong enough to withstand the disruption.



It is your smaller companies and independent run businesses that are faced with ruin, opening the door to a new era of mergers and acquisitions that will further erode consumer choice and competition.

Schwab and Malleret tell us that the worst of the pandemic is yet to come, and from an economic standpoint I would not doubt them.



But let's look at the health aspect for a moment.

Global media coverage of Covid-19 has characterized it as a deadly virus that kills with impunity, and without the antidote of a vaccine could devour communities whole.

Your leaders power to reset anything here has been removed.

They will comply, or be eternally damned.

I am taking a nap now, glp issues can go to fucking hell.

[link to www.bibliotecapleyades.net (secure)]

Perhaps surprisingly, the authors offer up a little fact based logic.



They admit that Covid-19,

'one of the least deadly pandemics in the last 2000 years', and barring something unforeseen 'the consequences of the virus will be mild compared to previous pandemics.'

At the time the book was published, 0.006% of the global population were reported to have died from Covid-19. But even this low figure is not altogether accurate.


In the UK for instance the way the death rate has been calculated has meant that people who have been diagnosed with the virus and then succumbed to an accident within 28 days of being tested will have their cause of death marked as Covid-19.

To quote Professor Yoon Loke, from the University of East Anglia, and Professor Carl Heneghan, from Oxford University:

Anyone who has tested COVID positive but subsequently died at a later date of any cause will be included on the PHE COVID death figures...

Schwab and Malleret could not be clearer when they write that Covid-19,

'does not constitute an existential threat or a shock that will leave its imprint on the world's population for decades'.

As it stands the Spanish Flu and HIV/AIDS have a larger mortality rate.


It was not an uncontrollable spread of Covid-19 that caused governments around the world to shut down their national economies, but the data modeling of unaccountable technocrats like Neil Ferguson of Imperial College London that predicted,

hundreds of thousands of people were at immediate risk of dying without the imposition of social restrictions,

...which we now know to be a combination of social distancing and lockdown measures.


When Schwab and Malleret talk about 'Covid-19 leaving it's imprint on the world,' the truth of the matter is that it is the measures imposed in the name of Covid-19 that have caused widespread economic destruction, not the virus itself...



That distinction is one that mainstream outlets in particular refuse to engage with.


In summary, if we are to take the authors at their word, then they see a rise in nationalism and protectionism off the back of Covid-19 as a detriment to the quest for a Great Reset.



The much coveted Sustainable Development Goals could even be at risk should nations turn inward.



IMF Managing Director has said the world has a choice between the Great Reset or the Great Reversal (the Great Reversal being 'more poverty, more fragmentation, and less trade') I would argue that there is another way of looking at it.

In the book Schwab and Malleret describe how in an interdependent world - which is precisely the kind of world that global planners have been championing since at least the end of World War Two,

'risks conflate with each other, amplifying their reciprocal effects and magnifying their consequences'.

When nations are interdependent,

'the systemic connectivity between risks, issues, challenges determines the future.'

It is the old cliché of dominoes falling.



Once one falters it sets off a chain reaction, which was evidenced back in 2008 when Lehman Brothers collapsed.


The scale of change that globalists are calling for through the vehicle of a Great Reset, which by definition is global in nature, will in my view require the implosion of the current world order to lay the foundations for a new world order.



The old must make way for the new. And the one method for how that could be achieved is through increased kickback against interdependence. Sustained crises offer many opportunities for global planners.



The potential for,

a contested U.S. election

an upcoming no deal Brexit

warnings of 'vaccine nationalism',

...are three eventualities that if brought to bear could be exploited and used to advance the cause for a Great Reset.



I would say that the further the world appears from collaboration and cooperation, the more people are going to call for those very same things if they become increasingly desperate.


The authors say that there is only a narrow window of opportunity for the Great Reset. Let's keep in mind though that so far it is only global institutions like the WEF that are promoting the initiative, not national administrations.



When it starts to permeate politics is when you know the agenda is advancing.



But,

What exactly will the economic and societal conditions be when the Great Reset becomes part of the global conversation?



Has what we have seen up to now been enough to compel people to call for change on a global scale?



Has there yet been enough degradation and material change to living standards for citizens to implore global institutions to take action?

I would argue not...


Already 'solutions' like Universal Basic Income have been touted. But as yet there is not a widespread clamoring for change. But that time is coming.



Whether it be in the name of,

Agenda 2030 (aka Sustainable Development), The Green New Deal or The Great Reset,

...it would amount to largely the same outcome:

the subjugation once and for all of national sovereignty where the nation state is subordinate to global governance...

boom,this


For Agenda 2030 to be implemented successfully, Schwab and Malleret offer an alternative to the possibility of countries failing to come together.



As you might expect, it revolves around collaboration and cooperation. In their eyes no progress can otherwise be made.



Covid-19 offers the opportunity to,

'embed greater societal equality and sustainability into the recovery'.

And, crucially, this would,

'accelerate rather than delay progress towards 2030 Sustainable Development Goals'.

But it does not end simply with the full implementation of Agenda 2030.



Schwab and Malleret want to go further.



Their aim is that the open exposure of weaknesses within existing global infrastructure,

'may compel us to act faster by replacing failed institutions, processes and rules with new ones that are better suited to current and future needs.'

To convey the importance of this statement, the authors state that this alone is 'the essence of the Great Reset'.



What they appear to be seeking is global transformation where systems and the age of the algorithm take precedent over political institutions.



We are already beginning to see moves by major global institutions like,

the Trilateral Commission

the World Trade Organization

the European Union,

...to 'reform' and 'rejuvenate' both their work and membership.

tendencies=psychological manipulation
the shades terra this year, my dear you put in the trash all the colors earth=manipulation,ect,ect
this year are pastels and bang, we obey?!?!
the trends were the first mask

BOOM=long-term planning

and....
your comm....
xxx.

You loved your young age 1960, they instituted the Trend
OTHERWISE YOU WERE IN THE COUNTRY.
the city was up of the day, fashion, music and hollywood
In other words, we had to follow the $ counter card and abolish the cashiers?!?
i'm in what physical place?(because even this may be non-existent in today's world (depending on the theme or variety)

You are an excellent writer.

In fact, generations.
it's an honor to forget their parents and grandparents, they didn't belong to the trendy world



understand fashion, trend
and I went to where, the reality of the world today. in my thinking versus the real reality.
i am at what level of independence
the real question to ask me....xxx.

Every place you need to be now.

are we only trends (of the wind)
OR THE BIBLICAL VERSET 91

Psalm 91
New International Version
Psalm 91
1 Whoever dwells in the shelter of the Most High
will rest in the shadow of the Almighty.[a]
2 I will say of the Lord, “He is my refuge and my fortress,
my God, in whom I trust.”

3 Surely he will save you
from the fowler’s snare
and from the deadly pestilence.
4 He will cover you with his feathers,
and under his wings you will find refuge;
his faithfulness will be your shield and rampart.
5 You will not fear the terror of night,
nor the arrow that flies by day,
6 nor the pestilence that stalks in the darkness,
nor the plague that destroys at midday.
7 A thousand may fall at your side,
ten thousand at your right hand,
but it will not come near you.
8 You will only observe with your eyes
and see the punishment of the wicked.

9 If you say, “The Lord is my refuge,”
and you make the Most High your dwelling,
10 no harm will overtake you,
no disaster will come near your tent.
11 For he will command his angels concerning you
to guard you in all your ways;
12 they will lift you up in their hands,
so that you will not strike your foot against a stone.
13 You will tread on the lion and the cobra;
you will trample the great lion and the serpent.

14 “Because he loves me,” says the Lord, “I will rescue him;
I will protect him, for he acknowledges my name.
15 He will call on me, and I will answer him;
I will be with him in trouble,
I will deliver him and honor him.
16 With long life I will satisfy him
and show him my salvation.”

are we only trends (of the wind)
OR THE BIBLICAL VERSET 91
XXX.

Great analysis
I don’t understand the justification of reliance on algorithms when those algorithms and forecasts have obviously failed during this pandemic

[link to www.Andrea (secure)] Bocelli - Gratia Plena 606 784 vues•28 août 2020 17 K 212 PARTAGER ENREGISTRERyoutube.com/watch?v=uvhWrGFnXEs

SOMETIMES YOU HAVE TO ACKNOWLEDGE AND FORGET THE REST TO FOLLOW HUMILITY AND GET DOWN ON YOUR KNEES.

ANDREA,10* FOR YOU,THANK FOR THIS

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Covid 2.0 after covid 1.9

Something Biblical or we wouldn’t be here, I suppose.
Although, XXX sounds fun, it’s not really possible.
I just love all the coherent thoughts and tone of the writing.

XXX....BOOM!

POSSIBLE BUT I ALWAYS CHOOSE THE ANALYSIS AND THE DISCERNMENT AND THE +D,ASSET IF POSSIBLE XXX.

The situation now is that the virus,

'marks a fundamental inflection point in our global trajectory.'

In a very short space of time it,

'magnified the fault lines that beset our economies and societies'.

AND THIS

[link to kingworldnews.com (secure)]

Another All-Time High
September 21 (King World News) – Holger Zschaepitz: Just to keep things into perspective: Combined balance sheet of Fed, BoJ and ECB has hit to fresh all-time high at $21.3 trillion, equal to US GDP, meaning that paper money continues to be devalued, which may not be reflected in consumer prices, but in asset prices. (See chart below).

Fed, BoJ, ECB Balance Sheets Hit
All-Time High $21.3 Trillion!
SEE TABLOID

Mind The Gap
Holger Zschaepitz: Mind the gap: While S&P 500 has fallen for the 3rd consecutive week, global liquidity has hit fresh all-time high. (See chart below).
SEE TABLOID

AND....

[link to www.zerohedge.com (secure)]

n Stunning Reversal, CDC Says It Published New Guidance On Risks Of 'Airborne' COVID-19 "In Error"
Profile picture for user Tyler Durden
by Tyler Durden
Mon, 09/21/2020 - 13:10
TwitterFacebookRedditEmailPrint
After publishing guidance warning about the serious risks of "airborne" infection associated with SARS-CoV-2, the CDC just seriously harmed its own credibility by acknowledging Monday that it had posted the new guidance "in error", following a pressure campaign from the WHO.

Scientists have been gathering evidence that the novel coronavirus plaguing the world spreads via aerosol particles practically since it first emerged, and back in July, a group of 200 scientists sent a letter to the WHO urging the international public health agency to change its guidance on the spread of the disease. The problem scientists argued is that the WHO hasn't updated its views to incorporate new research showing that aerosol spread is a much greater threat than touching contaminated surfaces, or via large droplets spread by close contact between individuals.

Yet, the WHO has refused these overtures, and this week it successfully convinced the CDC to do the same.

After the WHO announced earlier that it had reached out to the CDC over the guidance change, the agency informed American media outlets that a "draft version" of the guidance had been "posted in error".

+ VIDEO ...AND....

[link to www.zerohedge.com (secure)]

[link to www.zerohedge.com (secure)]


Even so, the American media has grown increasingly convinced that aerosols significantly contribute to overall spread of the virus, with ABC News suggesting yesterday that expensive UV-light powered surface cleaners were merely examples of "hygiene theater". For months, the CDC has insisted that these large droplets are the primary mode of transmission, which is why - it argued - people must wear masks in public, because masks are effective at blocking large particles.

However, masks - at least, homemade clothe masks with imperfect seals - aren't as effective at filtering all aerosol particles. Furthermore, research suggests aerosol particles released when a person sneezes can reach up to 26 feet.



Source: WSJ

Experts quoted in the US press reports are already slamming the CDC for injecting more confusion into the conversation surrounding COVID-19 prevention at a particularly risky time. After all, schools are still reopening across the US and many are diving headlong into the unknown, fearful that all of this activity could cause another wave of the pandemic, as Dr. Scott Gottlieb warned yesterday.




The FDA is already under fire for its allegedly "premature" approval of convalescent plasma, which critics claim is the result of untoward political pressure from the president. On Friday, the CDC also abandoned controversial guidance saying not everybody who comes into contact with an infected person needs to be tested, and that tests should only be required for those experiencing symptoms.

All this scrutiny is helping to cement a new nickname for the agency.


NEVER MISS THE NEWS THAT MATTERS MOST
ZEROHEDGE DIRECTLY TO YOUR INBOX

Receive a daily recap featuring a curated list of must-read stories.

Your email...
It could also give more fodder to people like Bill Gates, who has started attacking the FDA's credibility as the agency rushes toward emergency approval of a vaccine.

and...
XXX,

the great reset is not there's OP but I assume there is some seeding of some plans thru them.


the Great reset comes AFTER the magnetic reversal... its much better planned. But look any because the world is too over populated for a reset. the world cannot be sustainable reset as it is...

How does one know if they are an asset or liability in more economy that is wanting to be forged?

Also, your tenacity about the subject is inspiring.

THIS:
One thing the authors do write on from a position of clarity is that never can the world return to normal. Or more to the point, be allowed to return to normal.



Their view is that before Covid-19 took hold, a,

'broken sense of normalcy prevailed'.

The situation now is that the virus,

'marks a fundamental inflection point in our global trajectory.'

In a very short space of time it,

'magnified the fault lines that beset our economies and societies'.

If it was not already obvious, then the authors confirm over the last few pages of the book that the United Nations' Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development program is intertwined with the Great Reset.



This is evident when studying the WEF's Strategic Intelligence unit.

Sustainable Development and the Great Reset go hand in hand.

For Agenda 2030 to be implemented successfully, Schwab and Malleret offer an alternative to the possibility of countries failing to come together.

We know that the outcome will be a World One government. I only wonder how long it will be until the mandatory, “vaccine,” will begin.

Also, I really think the Austrian range is beautiful with its fresh air. I want to be there sooner rather than later.

AND DO NOT FORGET FRANCOIS A ROME FOR ALL WORLD RELIGIONS

NOT PASS THIS!

GOOD NIGHT,XXX.

You are denied a reset, you will be damned turnips in the Mars hell you left me in.

Enjoy, you will never leave this universe.

Intoxicating ;)