MY GOD....Ruth Bader Ginsburg Actually ADMITTED the reason for Roe vs Wade was that Democrats WANTED to "Limit" POOR PEOPLE and MINORITIES!

You want to live in a racial jungle? Democrats are saving us from that!

My Bible reads Psalms 10:2 In arrogance the wicked hotly pursue the poor; let them be caught in the schemes which they have devised.

For some strange reason, I don't think she was referring to wanting to limit her OWN particular minority.

I'm shocked, not that this was their position but that one of them ACTUALLY ADMITTED IT!

[link to stream.org (secure)]

QUOTE:

“Frankly,” said Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2009, “I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.” She was speaking to the New York Times Magazine in an article on women on the court. Readers understood that those “populations” included racial minorities.

Don't think for a moment she was the ONLY one who understood this.

The reaction made sense. Some people who supported legal abortion wanted to reduce the number of the poor and disabled, a group disproportionately including black people.

For example, in 1992, pro-choice lawyer Ron Weddington urged president-elect Bill Clinton to get the abortion pill (RU-486) into production as quickly as possible. He had been one of the lawyers arguing the pro-choice case in Roe v. Wade. “I don’t think you’re going to get very far in reforming the country,” he wrote, “until we have a better educated, healthier, wealthier population.”

Well Roe V Wade has been an epic failure then since we have tons of poor people and minorities and those numbers, at least the minority population, has skyrocketed since roe v wade was passed.

I'm shocked, not that this was their position but that one of them ACTUALLY ADMITTED IT!

[link to stream.org (secure)]

QUOTE:

“Frankly,” said Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2009, “I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.” She was speaking to the New York Times Magazine in an article on women on the court. Readers understood that those “populations” included racial minorities.

Don't think for a moment she was the ONLY one who understood this.

The reaction made sense. Some people who supported legal abortion wanted to reduce the number of the poor and disabled, a group disproportionately including black people.

For example, in 1992, pro-choice lawyer Ron Weddington urged president-elect Bill Clinton to get the abortion pill (RU-486) into production as quickly as possible. He had been one of the lawyers arguing the pro-choice case in Roe v. Wade. “I don’t think you’re going to get very far in reforming the country,” he wrote, “until we have a better educated, healthier, wealthier population.”

funny how the republicans get labeled as racist

Don't be alarmed, it's in the Bible, God spoke it...

Psalms 10:2 The wicked in his pride doth persecute the poor: let them be taken in the devices that they have imagined.

Psalms 10:8 He sitteth in the lurking places of the villages: in the secret places doth he murder the innocent: his eyes are privily set against the poor.


Psalms 10:9 He lieth in wait secretly as a lion in his den: he lieth in wait to catch the poor: he doth catch the poor, when he draweth him into his net.
******************************************************
[link to www.nowtheendbegins.com (secure)]

Fake News.

...

So she wasn't talking about herself. She was guessing at what the motivation of the court might have been. She herself wasn't involved in that court case and wasn't on the supreme court yet.

Fake News.

If you idiots read the rest of the linked article it says halfway down the page this

"So did Ginsburg mean what her critics said she meant? Did she admit that she and her peers wanted legalized abortion to reduce the number of poor and minority people?

No. It’s clear from the interview itself that she thought the court wanted to reduce the number of poor people. She was retelling a history, not giving her own view. As her defenders noted, nothing in her writings and decisions suggests she thinks like this. (And it’s often forgotten that she criticized how broad a decision Roe was.)

She was then a 39-year-old lawyer who had nothing to do with arguing the case, just looking at it from the outside. She had guessed at the justices’ mindset."




So she wasn't talking about herself. She was guessing at what the motivation of the court might have been. She herself wasn't involved in that court case and wasn't on the supreme court yet.

I'm shocked, not that this was their position but that one of them ACTUALLY ADMITTED IT!

[link to stream.org (secure)]

QUOTE:

“Frankly,” said Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2009, “I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.” She was speaking to the New York Times Magazine in an article on women on the court. Readers understood that those “populations” included racial minorities.

Don't think for a moment she was the ONLY one who understood this.

The reaction made sense. Some people who supported legal abortion wanted to reduce the number of the poor and disabled, a group disproportionately including black people.

For example, in 1992, pro-choice lawyer Ron Weddington urged president-elect Bill Clinton to get the abortion pill (RU-486) into production as quickly as possible. He had been one of the lawyers arguing the pro-choice case in Roe v. Wade. “I don’t think you’re going to get very far in reforming the country,” he wrote, “until we have a better educated, healthier, wealthier population.”

Don't seem appalled. It just so happens that glpers don't like minorities or poor people, even though most of you are poor yourselves. Just more welfare for you losers.

Every leftist group undermines minorities. Republicans are the only group that actually advances black people. Everything else is lip service or limits growth.

Oh please explain how Republicans advance black people. By giving them lawns to cut?

I'm shocked, not that this was their position but that one of them ACTUALLY ADMITTED IT!

[link to stream.org (secure)]

QUOTE:

“Frankly,” said Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2009, “I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.” She was speaking to the New York Times Magazine in an article on women on the court. Readers understood that those “populations” included racial minorities.

Don't think for a moment she was the ONLY one who understood this.

The reaction made sense. Some people who supported legal abortion wanted to reduce the number of the poor and disabled, a group disproportionately including black people.

For example, in 1992, pro-choice lawyer Ron Weddington urged president-elect Bill Clinton to get the abortion pill (RU-486) into production as quickly as possible. He had been one of the lawyers arguing the pro-choice case in Roe v. Wade. “I don’t think you’re going to get very far in reforming the country,” he wrote, “until we have a better educated, healthier, wealthier population.”

:lebronracist: