Any theory other than the OFFICIAL SCIENCE VERSION is dangerous - Science as a belief system Propaganda

The White Coats are the new priest class.
It's funny how not matter how much things change, we are still living with our inherited group psyche... we always think that we are right, and those that think otherwise are evil or stupid. hahaha

Jizzlaine Maxwell's daddy bought up many prestigious science journals several decades ago in an attempt by the elite to control science narratives..

Money and science do not mix well, and the marriage produces "junk" science -- good only for political agendas.

Junk science is pseudo science.

Excommunication = Losing tenure

I'm sorry, did you just claim that religion doesn't change.
Which Bible do you read? There are hundreds.
Ever hear of the council of nicea? Your religion can't even decide what it believes.

Science changes because the depth of our knowledge changes, we learn.
Religion is going backward denying facts.

And this is where you jumped the shark. I really wish we could get a bunch of you science deniers and strap you to the next rocket. To see the stars your eyes have to be dark adapted. If you're just sitting in the spacecraft with the lights on you're not going to see any stars out the window. If you turn the lights off and make a deliberate effort to allow your eyes to dark adapt over several minutes, you'll see lots of stars. And if you put an eye patch on to keep an eye dark adapted you can use it to navigate the spacecraft by the stars with a sextant. Apollo astronauts actually did this to navigate to and from the moon. Whether or not you see the stars very much depends upon the context in which you were asking that question. But you would have to understand science to understand that. It's not a lie, it's just your ignorance.

Science is the study of nature's systems presented in a manner that we humans can understand. Nature is truth. It exists and it is existence in a 3D form. Whether we understand the how and and whys or remain willfully ignorant, nature/existence will continue to exist in some form.

Humans are natural scientists, but the controllers behind the curtains have dumbed down society to make us dependent upon outside technology and/or people with specialized knowledge to tell us how to live.

I am fortunate to live in the jungle, spending most of my days watching nature: clouds, animals, weather, insects, seasons, water flow, migration patterns...

What makes one a scientist? Do I not qualify for the term if that is my life and plan for the future?

The term "science" has turned into Orwellian doublespeak, for today's "science" is merely political interpretations of nature's systems to fit the globalist, dystopian agenda. Maybe in this war is peace/ignorance is strength world, anti-science might be a ribbon worn with pride, as it really means anti-political interpretations of nature's systems.

LMFAO! I keep a gun on myself at all times and I deal with death threats from ignorant anti-scientific nut jobs who hate my guts and want to kill me. I'm not even just talking about people on this forum, I'm talking about people I know in real life who have threatened to kill me because they can't stand me. Yeah, my white lab coat really gave me some serious priest class luxury didn't it? Space denying nut jobs are some of the most dangerous people I know.

Last Edited by Astromut on 10/05/2020 03:15 PM

The technocrats can't have people questioning the dogma now can they. Especially when they are in the process of clamping down on full control and enslavement of all mankind.

It's even a war on critical thinkers who are fully qualified scientists. Science-by-consensus is a crutch for those who cannot think independently about science.

It's a shame to see the inmates taking over the asylum, or the failed students taking over the university, like this.

Correct.

Science has no political affiliation, if is does, it isn’t science.

Science has no bias, if is does, it isn’t science
Science has no agenda, if is does, it isn’t science

Science does pander to anyone’s feelings, it doesn’t change itself to accommodate mental illness, it doesn’t deny that which is known fact in favor of that which was fabricated by fools.

When “science” is manipulated to create specific results it isn’t science.

When “science” is funded by someone who expects their money to yield a result that benefits them.... you know... you know the thing.


There is no field that is untouched by corruption anymore, from business, politics, the court system, medicine, pharmaceuticals, education, big tech, every corner of the world has been tempted if not fully infiltrated by corruption, and as such we would be foolish to fail to consider that when evaluating information from ANY source.

Astro. Have you ever been in space?
Have you ever seen with your own eyes?
I don't deny science.

That describes some natural science. Physical science, chemistry and physics, requires more quantitative reasoning, and physics especially merges into various areas of higher mathematics. It gives ways of understanding the world that aren't immediately obvious to the eye and common sense.

I've seen and recorded it myself many times.




I've independently verified with my own equipment that their missions are real.

Science is the study of the universe to determine through specific method what is the truth and what is theory.

Any one that tells you to not attempt to discover the truth for yourself is no scientist, they are also an idiot.

Thanks for the PINE.

Great Photos. I am aware you have several imaging devices.
I would like to have the same. And actually, I admire your level of experience.

But that isn't my question.
My question is, have you ever been to space?

It's easy for the elites to corrupt "science" in order to push an agenda. You see this with "global warming" especially. Big pharma also is very corrupted, using "scientific studies" that are often biased and to shut down alternative much cheaper competition.

In innately understood Chaos and Complexity Theory before I knew they existed. I believe that we all have an natural intelligence that allows us to understand these concepts, but we are controlled to be subservient to the masters and thus lose this natural intelligence, thus having to resort to "experts" to interpret nature for us.

Advanced science is merely a specialization of sciences, but it is still the study of systems and putting it in a way we can understand them.

In any language, there is often something missing in the interpretation. The same goes for science because today's version of science is not about knowledge and understanding, it is using that knowledge for economic or political purposes to control society, which in turn justifies lying, withholding or manipulating information by "scientists". We don't know what is true or fake, but we do know there is a lot of fakery out there.

Manipulating/engineering nature is not science because science is the study of nature, not the manipulation of nature in some form to create a desired result. Anything outside the study of Nature is not science, it is engineering/ecology/chemistry/physics - whatever - based upon the knowledge of Nature's systems. GMOs are not "scientific"; they area result of someone/something wanting to manipulate Nature for economic purposes and used the understanding of Nature's systems to build their product. . Speaking out against GMOs is considered "anti-science" even though "science" is the reason people are against GMOs.

It waz kewl when u punched that Bart dude buzzmut.

I'm helping launch payloads to space. I don't need to go to space myself to measure things in space and verify they're really there and really doing what they're supposed to be doing. I don't accept the premise, science lets me verify these things empirically from the ground.

Sounds an awful lot like "any claim other than that the earth is the center of the universe is dangerous".

Dark Ages II

Scientific knowledge is always in flux and all scientific 'laws' are subject to change or even replacement. As we learn new things, some of our old ideas may require revision. It's the inherent nature of learning and growing. To hold a piece of science as an immobile truth is to not understand the nature of science; we should consider different points of view to the constructive end of achieving a better understanding of our infinite surroundings. To maintain an unwillingness to open our hearts and minds to new possibilities only perpetuates the limits we experience in this finite dimension, limits I believe we were meant to acknowledge and subsequently exceed with impunity.

Science is never absolute and it makes statements based upon a preponderance of information gathered by many people who do experiments and contend with peer review. It's the best way to get the best view of all of nature.

Compare that to superstition and absolute belief in what cannot be tested or proved.

I prefer science

south park "go god go" 2 part episode is basically EXACTLY this.

GOD IS REAL
THE EARTH IS FLAT
THE ENLIGHTENMENT WAS SATANIC
DONT TAKE THE VA666CINE
DONT WEAR THE MA666SK
ONLY JESUS SAVES!

15 min. in and I feel it's a brainwash to make me accept global warming and all things mainstream

Truth mixed with lies

Mainstream bias compliance; go with the flow

Prescribed reality-commercial

Accept
Comply
Sleep

Last Edited by Gorgol on 10/05/2020 06:30 PM

This is a pro-climate change video.
They try to explain why you should believe their scientists rather than deciding for yourself.