Flat earth is a theory, like evolution, made up to mock religion.

Do you believe man used to live nearly a thousand years at one time?

Maybe you think the bible is like a prehistoric internet?

Speaking of prehistoric....... Who came up for names for prehistoric dinosaurs remains?

Was man alive during the dinosaur age?

According to scripture, while also acknowledging various legends on the subject otherwise as well; during the flood, it rained 40 days and 40 nights and flooded the whole earth.

I wonder.....some of those dinosaur remains are pretty large amphibious creatures, OR creatures of the water predominantly.

Do you suppose that they enjoyed the flesh of men while the floods receded? Thus leaving very few remnant of man on earth?

What about the Ice age? All of that flood water..... How long would 40 days and 40 night of flood water, from both heaven and broken up from the deep would it take to recede from the earth?

Does anyone know? Was the Ice age part of that recession?

What would all of that flood water do to the earths environment?

A lot of people talk about climate change, but a flood of those proportions would certainly effect the climate.

That's a lot of water for the atmosphere to react too as it receded and along with the seasons changing, I bet a lot of earths history can be explained by looking at models of such.

I am going to go play fortnite.

Let people ponder those and this.

Religion and flat-earth "theory" are both retarded nonsense for the mentally ill..

I don't block the mentally ill from my threads as long as they don't attempt to hijack it.

I'm not a flat earther, but there are interesting things they mention and experiments done that show some plausibility to it. I do not see how it mocks religion. Eric Dubay is a buddist, I think, or some kind of new ager. And some prominant flat earthers are not religious.

I think Kent Hovind's take on dinosaurs and the flood is interesting.

Also, the Book of Jasher, which, although I do not believe any modern copies to be reliable, but is an interesting read - it says that it took a year for the flood waters to recede.

It's not a theory. It's a measurable fact

Religion SHOULD be mocked, for the utter stupidity that it and its followers represent.

Come on ball believers, the spinning water ball Earth in a 'space vacuum theory has been around for hundreds of years, don't you think proof of it should be easy to find, it's lacking proof enough for Earth not a globe.

Earth is flat and non-rotating

Anyone have a Earth terrestrial globe showing the correct sizes and dimensions of all of the continents and oceans, no there are none.

Okay, so If we're flat how does gravity work? Shit doesn't add up.

Evolution, Categories of Disproof


A proof or disproof is a kind of a transaction. There is no such thing as absolutely proving or disproving something; there is only such a thing as proving or disproving something to SOMEBODY'S satisfaction. If the party of the second part is too thick or too ideologically committed to some other way of viewing reality, then the best proof in the world will fall flat and fail.

In the case of evolution, what you have is a theory which has been repeatedly and overwhelmingly disproved over a period of many decades now via a number of independent lines reasoning and yet the adherents go on with it as if nothing had happened and, in fact, demand that the doctrine be taught in public schools at public expense and that no other theory of origins even ever be mentioned in public schools, and attempt to enforce all of that via political power plays and lawsuits.

At that point, it is clear enough that no disproof or combination of disproofs would ever suffice, that the doctrine is in fact unfalsifiable and that Carl Popper's criteria for a pseudoscience is in fact met.


The educated lay person is not aware of how overwhelmingly evolution has been debunked over the last century. The following is a minimal list of entire categories of evidence disproving evolution:

• The decades-long experiments with fruit flies beginning in the early 1900s. Those tests were intended to demonstrate macroevolution; the failure of those tests was so unambiguous that a number of prominent scientists disavowed evolution at the time.
• The discovery of the DNA/RNA info codes (information codes do not just sort of happen…)
• The fact that the info code explained the failure of the fruit-fly experiments (the whole thing is driven by information and the only info there ever was in that picture was the info for a fruit fly…)
• The discovery of bio-electrical machinery within 1-celled animals.
• The question of irreducible complexity.
• The Haldane Dilemma. That is, the gigantic spaces of time it would take to spread any genetic change through an entire herd of animals.
• The increasingly massive evidence of a recent age for dinosaurs. This includes soft tissue being found in dinosaur remains, good radiocarbon dates for dinosaur remains (blind tests at the University of Georgia's dating lab), and native American petroglyphs clearly showing known dinosaur types.
• The fact that the Haldane dilemma and the recent findings related to dinosaurs amount to a sort of a time sandwich (evolutionites need quadrillions of years and only have a few tens of thousands).
• The dna analysis eliminating neanderthals and thus all other hominids as plausible human ancestors.
• The total lack of intermediate fossils where the theory demands that the bulk of all fossils be clear intermediate types. "Punctuated Equilibria" in fact amounts to an attempt to get around both the Haldane dilemma and the lack of intermediate fossils, but has an entirely new set of overwhelming problems of its own…
• The question of genetic entropy.
• The obvious evidence of design in nature.
• The arguments arising from pure probability and combinatoric considerations.


Here's what I mean when I use the term "combinatoric considerations"...

The best illustration of how untenable evolutionism really is involves trying to become some totally new animal with new organs, a new basic plan for existence, and new requirements for integration between both old and new organs.

Take flying birds for example; suppose you aren't one, and you want to become one. You'll need a baker's dozen highly specialized systems, including wings, flight feathers, the specialized system which allows flight feathers to pivot so as to open on upstrokes and close to trap air on downstrokes (like a venetian blind), a specialized light bone structure, specialized flow-through design heart and lungs, specialized tail, specialized general balance parameters etc.

For starters, every one of these things would be antifunctional until the day on which the whole thing came together, so that the chances of evolving any of these things by any process resembling evolution (mutations plus selection) would amount to an infinitessimal, i.e. one divided by some gigantic number.

In probability theory, to compute the probability of two things happening at once, you multiply the probabilities together. That says that the likelihood of all these things ever happening, best case, is ten or twelve such infinitessimals multiplied together, i.e. a tenth or twelth-order infinitessimal. The whole history of the universe isn't long enough for that to happen once.

All of that was the best case. In real life, it's even worse than that. In real life, natural selection could not plausibly select for hoped-for functionality, which is what would be required in order to evolve flight feathers on something which could not fly apriori. In real life, all you'd ever get would some sort of a random walk around some starting point, rather than the unidircetional march towards a future requirement which evolution requires.

And the real killer, i.e. the thing which simply kills evolutionism dead, is the following consideration: In real life, assuming you were to somehow miraculously evolve the first feature you'd need to become a flying bird, then by the time another 10,000 generations rolled around and you evolved the second such reature, the first, having been disfunctional/antifunctional all the while, would have DE-EVOLVED and either disappeared altogether or become vestigial.

Now, it would be miraculous if, given all the above, some new kind of complex creature with new organs and a new basic plan for life had ever evolved ONCE.

Evolutionism, however (the Theory of Evolution) requires that this has happened countless billions of times, i.e. an essentially infinite number of absolutely zero probability events.

I ask you: What could be worse than that?

Fruit flies breed new generations every few days. Running a continuous decades-long experiment on fruit flies will involve more generations of fruit flies than there have ever been of anything resembling humans on Earth. Evolution is supposed to be driven by random mutation and natural selection; they subjected those flies to everything in the world known to cause mutations and recombined the mutants every possible way, and all they ever got was fruit flies.

Richard Goldschmidt wrote the results of all of that up in 1940, noting that it was then obvious enough that no combination of mutation and selection could ever produce a new kind of animal.

There is no excuse for evolution to ever have been taught in schools after 1940.

I mean, if you believe in evolution, then

The flood described in Genesis 7 was a physical event and physical events have physical causes...

[link to steemit.com (secure)]

The only part of the story of the flood in Genesis 7 that you need to reject is the notion that sin was involved. That was an embellishment added into the story by priests of later ages. God is bright enough not to wipe the entire system over sin, only to have sin back in business forty years later as if nothing had happened.

Antediluvian lifespans you ask??

The attenuation of gravity that allowed large dinosaurs to exist (they'd be crushed by their own weight in present gravity) also removed nearly all physical stress from humans. There was no such thing as arthritis prior to the flood.

Absolutely!

All religion is a cult. It creates FEAR.....and offers no
real help until you are dead! People then look to religion
as some kind of protection. NO one knows much about
physical death.....and that "book" doesn't even allow
the hard questions...and keeps people as sheep in a pen.
I can only assume that's where they are held until time
to be slaughtered.

I now believe that Heaven is a STATE OF MIND, not a place.

Physical death is not necessary to enter.

Each os us are creating our OWN personal reality, using
what we believe is truth. All truth is subjective, and it's
YOUR truth that is true.

What do you believe, and why do you believe it?

The Earth isn't flat and gravity is not a basic force in nature; gravity is an electrostatic dipole effect created by spin forces i.e. it's a second cousin to gyroscopic force and the forces that create sinkers and sliders in baseball.

religion was good for some people at some times
today it is a burden of ones real objectivity

Flat Earth and Creationism are a perfect fit.

We aren't told the true history of this world.



Last Edited by ChefElvis on 10/08/2020 07:34 AM

YOU are religion demon.

Over 200 bible verses support flat earth sooooo....

Noah wasn’t saved from the flood because he was a “perfect” person, he was saved because he was “perfect in all his generations”, he wasn’t genetically modified.

Fallen angels came to earth and took earthly women as wives (gen 6), they bore the nephilim (giants and hybrid beings). Fallen angels played with Gods creation.

People say “how could God be Love but wipe out entire tribes (men women children and animal)” God commanded the extermination of the hybrid beings (more than 30 tribes of giants)

The trees we have to today are like grass to the ones of ancient times. Fallen angels were commanded to chop them down and they are cursed because of it.

It’s all about trans humanism and satans seed. He perverts everything of Gods. “As above so below”

“They“ are Hiding true creation. Satans goal is not for us to worship him (he doesn’t care who we worship) he wants us to forget about God.

2 Thessalonians 2:9-12

9 Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,

10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:

12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

Earth is stationary.

Go home to mummy
.
Bible says earth is FLAT

Flat and stationary.