Flat earth is a theory, like evolution, made up to mock religion.

False. most religions in their texts state a flat stationary earth

Last Edited by slavin777 on 10/08/2020 08:45 AM

Near death experiences. They have shown with a consistent message that there is a next. Some have claimed to float so high above their body that they can see the earth. I've heard this a few times now and they have said that the earth is actually round.

That's something called a fallacy or an error in logic.

THE WORD DINOSAUR WAS INVENTED IN 1850

WHEN THE LAST OF THEM WAS KILLED

THAT'S WHY THE BONES STILL HAVE DNA IN THEM

THERE ARE NO THEORIES IN HEAVEN

THERE IS NO LOGIC IN HEAVEN

I've read hundreds of near death experiences and aside from a good many of them being merely creative writing - I've also read that there is no God, there is a God, no life review, there is a life review, no judgement, no Jesus, there is a Jesus, tunnel experience, no tunnel experience, reincarnation, no reincarnation... etc...

So easy to fool people but it is hard to convince them that they have been fooled. I’ll keep under my little firmament on a stationary flat earth. You will see the truth one day.

Yup.

Gravity is just density dumbass. Whats heavier than air goes down. Not complicated...retarded ass scientists made up gravity. There isn't even a formula for it. God the populace is dumb

K
Just like dreaming the mind is powerful. Earth isn't round

God is also a theory.

Not even. God is a hypothesis. A scientific theory must have certain criteria:
*It needs to be consistent with all the available data/evidence.
*It needs to be potentially falsifiable
*It needs to make accurate predictions about future data

Evolution meets this criteria.

*All of the data (from fossils to genetics) is consistent with the model of common ancestry.
*A single fossil out of place would falsify evolution. If birds appear before dinosaurs, if a rabbit appears in the cambrian etc. But this never happens.
*Lastly, the model of common ancestry can be used to predict the location of fossils, and the presence of genetic markers/ERVs.

Now let's compare that with God:

*No evidence or data, excluding anecdotes, scriptures and 'feelings.'
*God can never be falsified, as an omnipotent, omniscent being could potentially hide itself from us forever.
*The 'God model' can't be used to make any accurate predictions about the future, and when people try they fail.

Religion doesnt need any help with being mocked. Its all for weak minded simpletons.

lol.

Some of the responses in this thread.......

Like pirate of the Caribbean movie.......Up is down.

Or like the world we live in today.

Wrong is right.

The world is full of wing dings. Some of the answers in here prove that. Wing dings are not a theory....

Do some hamsters prefer hamster wheels over hamster balls?

I think going north is uphill and south downhill.

Munchkins are real too. I found a picture!

:goaster:

I don't intend on spending much time on this thread. Interesting as some of the comments are.

SINCE SCIENCE CAN'T EXPLAIN GRAVITY

THE SCIENCE OF GRAVITY IS SHIT



HOWEVER

GOD IS LOVE

AND THAT IT

THE TRUTH

AND

THE TRUTH

IS

JESUS CHRIST

ABSOLUTE AND PERFECT

THE CENTER OF EVERYTHING

JUST AS THE EARTH IS THE CENTER OF EVERYTHING

WE KNOW THIS

BECAUSE ALL THE STARS CIRCLE THE EARTH

AND

IF

YOU CIRCLE JESUS CHRIST

YOUR PERCEPTION OF WHAT IS

IS

THE TRUTH

I think you ought to engage and discuss it objectively, but you probably won't even read this, given what you said above.

Not really sure why you asked the questions at the start of the thread, if you weren't looking for answers, it seems a little self-indulgent to me, on the surface - and if you posted your questions to make others stop and think, they might not be in the right place in life or frame of mind to consider them seriously - which is why you should discuss it instead of post, pontificate and leave.

Last Edited by Grundig on 10/09/2020 10:11 AM

Hmmm.

Good points.

In all truth, I posted it not expecting anything I said to gain much traction.

Everyone has an opinion.

For example, do I believe humans were much larger than today in biblical pre flood times predominantly?

Yes, I do.

I imagine with longevity of age according to scripture, those humans had much larger physique than humans do today. I imagine trees where huge too, not the little things we have now.

Imagine redwoods today. I think most trees were as huge or larger as a general rule across the globe.

Can you fathom living 800 years as a human? Yet....bible says it was the norm for early man.