FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.

Flat-earthers have moved on, they now follow Qanon.

The round earth model explains every observable phenomenon in a very simple and elegant way. And it is easy to understand and leaves no questions unanswered.

The flat earth model on the other hand fails to explain even the most basic observations and leaves a ton of questions unanswered.

Dude, you're quoting a book written during a time when ppl thought you could see the future by blowing goats and that you could transfer your military prowess into your protégé by creampie-ing his asshole. Your fairytale narrative is the fucking hoax, not science.

Prove it to me then.

Explain it "all in a simple and elegant way".

You say the words, but I doubt you have ever actually tried to verify that assumption of simplicity. All you do is present in an arrogant and self-satisfied manner, as if you had figured out the "facts" yourself, and aren't just regurgitating what you have learned.

Amusing.

What is this simple, elegant model you speak of that explains both curvature, and 2-point perspective (vertical is always parallel) simultaneously?

not you again. "I'm an engineer but I'm on the fence about flat earth."

And why can I see the tops of distant thunderhead clouds when the bottom part of the cloud is below the horizon?

The round earth model explains every observable phenomenon in a very simple and elegant way. And it is easy to understand and leaves no questions unanswered.

The flat earth model on the other hand fails to explain even the most basic observations and leaves a ton of questions unanswered.

They let him build all kinds of shit with the Legos at his group home--he's the best little engineer they have!

I've posted this several times with real flight data. All I get is denial, BS, or that flight data is part of the GE conspiracy.

FE can't make the realization they are saying that worlds transportation and navigation systems are using invalid data.

:FEmapMelAkl:

You're a fool that can't explain away my simple observations, so you attempt ridicule.

Weak effort.

Why not just actually answer the questions rather than saying one worders like "refraction", as if you had actually verified this stuff yourself rather than just "assuming" a position.

I don't assume anything, and am merely asking questions that you cant answer.

You seem unble to.

(Also, I never said I was an Engineer... more assumptions).

It’s interesting that the globe earth shills nimmerfall, ST37, and remedial rebel all cant put a dent in the reasoning of the flat earthers (or at least globe earth questioners) here. Looks like someone has won the debate!

not you again. "I'm an engineer but I'm on the fence about flat earth."

According to Nasa the earth rotates at 1000 mph. Every day, year in year, it rotates at this constant speed.

Imagine your location at midday is degree 66.6 on the equator on the 360 degree circle of earth. Everyday at midday your position would be degree 66.6

Now draw on a piece of paper the sun in the middle and the earth to its right. Your position at degree 66.6 is facing the sun hence it is daylight. Call this summer or June 6th for reference.

Now bearing in mind the rotational speed of earth is constant you will always be at degree 66.6 at midday no matter what day of the year it is.

Now zoom forward six months. According to Nasa the earth revolves around the sun and the time it takes to rotate is one earth year. On dec 6th if you draw the same picture with the sun in the middle the earth should now be on the left of the sun having made 180 degrees of journey over these six months.

The problem for NASA though is at midday Dec 6th the earth's rotation on its axis means the 66.6 degree position in now facing away from the sun and therefore it should be night. Yet all our observation and experience proves to us it is always daylight on the earth on dec 6th at the equator, year in and year out.

So NASA and other scientists are barefaced lying to you but what do you expect from an organisation founded by the Satanist Jack Parsons, Walt Disney, L. Ron fucking Hubbard and various Nazi scientists spirited over during operation Paperclip?

For those who question the motive of this deception the answer is very simple. The flat immovable non rotating earth with the sun, moon and stars revolving around the earth at the centre of Creation working like a clock to aid man in knowing the times and seasons proves the Bible is true and that there is a designer Creator and that your life does have meaning and purpose rather than the fantastical nihilistic notion that everything came out of nothing and that you are noting more than a random accident with an unknown cause and no purpose whatsoever.

Too many of you will deny this reality and even people like Richard Dawkins when probed will revert to some sort of intelligent creator as long as it's not God (simulation theory etc).

So globe earth shills answer my example above how it is possible with a constant rotation of the earth axis to have daylight at midday in winter and summer when the earth is facing the sun in summer and facing away from the sun in winter according to the NASA model if you can. I am eager to see the intellectual contortions you will come up for this solitary example out of many that you have been lied to since you were born. That is why in the Bible God tells us Satan has deceived the whole world, not a quarter, not a half but the whole world, get it?

What is this simple, elegant model you speak of that explains both curvature, and 2-point perspective (vertical is always parallel) simultaneously?

"vertical is always parallel" is simply not true. So there is nothing to explain here - it is not parallel.

Next question please!

Prove it!

You state a massive assumption there as if it was fact.

It is also categorically wrong.

Find me a single example of non-parallel vertical objects due to gravity.

I'll give you a few you can start with:
*Wind turbines across hundreds of kilometres - always vertical and parallel.
*Buildings across a huge urban area - always vertical and parallel.

*Power poles on very long straight roads - always vertical and parallel.

I'll wait.

In case you want to say that the angle is imperceptible because it is too small to see, here's the numbers:
For every 111km horizontal distance, there is 1degree of tilt "assumed" on a round earth.

Humans are highly attuned to vertical alignment (we can see very quickly when large vertical objects show any signs of non-verticalness - self-preservation). An average human can perceive 100th of a degree angle, highly tuned individuals can perceive up to 1000th of a degree.

So, do you have any support for your statement?

The geometry: two parallel steel rails, one on the ground, the other one metre above.

At 28 kilometres, the top rail should be significantly longer. No?

[link to www.zmescience.com (secure)]

"vertical is always parallel" is simply not true. So there is nothing to explain here - it is not parallel.

Next question please!

Not an Engineer, but since you want to go there, here is an interesting "engineering" deliverable I was involved with.

The geometry: two parallel steel rails, one on the ground, the other one metre above. Horizontal distance of 28 kilometers, with signal boxes every 4 kilometres. Quantities for both top and bottom rails were exactly the same!!!

At 28 kilometres, the top rail should be significantly longer. No?

Exactly the same length for top rail and bottom rail in the 3D model, qauntaties taken from the model, installed perfectly (usually his would be ordered as a combined kilometer length for both top and bottom rails, so wouldn't be noticed).

Please Explain?

This is one of the projects that made me question round earth. I only "happened" to look at the lengths out of luck and discovered the aberation.

Also made me consider past projects where we HAD accounted for the curve of the earth, and most of those projects always had left over material.

I've posted this several times with real flight data. All I get is denial, BS, or that flight data is part of the GE conspiracy or crickets.

FE can't make the realization they are saying that worlds transportation and navigation systems are using invalid data.

:FEmapMelAkl:

I'll give you a few you can start with:
*Wind turbines across hundreds of kilometres - always vertical and parallel.
*Buildings across a huge urban area - always vertical and parallel.

*Power poles on very long straight roads - always vertical and parallel.

I'll wait.

In case you want to say that the angle is imperceptible because it is too small to see, here's the numbers:
For every 111km horizontal distance, there is 1degree of tilt "assumed" on a round earth.

you're allowing the flattard troll to distract you. Nowhere in the Bible does it claim Earth is flat.

That's too much curvature.
Is the world that small?

They are not parallel.



In case you want to say that the angle is imperceptible because it is too small to see, here's the numbers:
For every 111km horizontal distance, there is 1degree of tilt "assumed" on a round earth.

Yes. It will be 7 millimeters longer.

this means the OP and the picture of curvature is a lie