"Uncle" Intel of the finest sort - a Delaware lawyer dissects Joe Biden | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19876247 United States 10/27/2020 05:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79338671 United States 10/27/2020 05:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76571348 Canada 10/27/2020 05:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Holy Molly! this thing, "court packing", has a name? Dang, I learned about it yesterday, while listening to the radio. A canadian one at that. They began their segment by, of course, dissing President Trump. They told how a horrible monster he was for appointing a conservative judge, that he was a liar, an asset for the russians, etc. Same old without any substantiation of any form, obviously. Then, it became interesting, because they began talking about the dems. They said the dems were too noble to play President Trump's game to mess with the supreme court. A supreme court that went from far left to the right, they said, and that was baaad. The dems would, instead, create tens of thousands of new judges position and would make sure that everyone of them WOULD be leaning left to rule over cases and make sure they never, ever reach the supreme court. IF the dems get elected, of course. I kid you not. They were talking about it as being heavily talked amongst the dems, right now. ----- For a while now, canadian media outlets have been on the left side of things, even the right. And lies are as common as stars at night... |
Busterhymen
User ID: 78940028 United States 10/27/2020 06:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
beeches
(OP) User ID: 78973486 United States 10/27/2020 06:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79338671 United States 10/27/2020 06:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Holy Molly! this thing, "court packing", has a name? Dang, I learned about it yesterday, while listening to the radio. A canadian one at that. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76571348 They began their segment by, of course, dissing President Trump. They told how a horrible monster he was for appointing a conservative judge, that he was a liar, an asset for the russians, etc. Same old without any substantiation of any form, obviously. Then, it became interesting, because they began talking about the dems. They said the dems were too noble to play President Trump's game to mess with the supreme court. A supreme court that went from far left to the right, they said, and that was baaad. The dems would, instead, create tens of thousands of new judges position and would make sure that everyone of them WOULD be leaning left to rule over cases and make sure they never, ever reach the supreme court. IF the dems get elected, of course. I kid you not. They were talking about it as being heavily talked amongst the dems, right now. ----- For a while now, canadian media outletsu have been on the left side of things, even the right. And lies are as common as stars at night... "Court Packing" means CHANGING America's Supreme Court from a Judicial to a "banana" institution. |
beeches
(OP) User ID: 78973486 United States 10/27/2020 06:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | People used to ask "Where's Hunter?" Quoting: Busterhymen Now everyone's asking..........."Where's Rudy?" posting here together from a cybercafé in Smolensk? make that a former cybercafé turned weaponzied opium den in Shanghai! Liberalism is totalitarianism with a human face – Thomas Sowell |
Peepaws
User ID: 16932078 United States 10/27/2020 06:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76571348 Canada 10/27/2020 06:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Holy Molly! this thing, "court packing", has a name? Dang, I learned about it yesterday, while listening to the radio. A canadian one at that. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76571348 They began their segment by, of course, dissing President Trump. They told how a horrible monster he was for appointing a conservative judge, that he was a liar, an asset for the russians, etc. Same old without any substantiation of any form, obviously. Then, it became interesting, because they began talking about the dems. They said the dems were too noble to play President Trump's game to mess with the supreme court. A supreme court that went from far left to the right, they said, and that was baaad. The dems would, instead, create tens of thousands of new judges position and would make sure that everyone of them WOULD be leaning left to rule over cases and make sure they never, ever reach the supreme court. IF the dems get elected, of course. I kid you not. They were talking about it as being heavily talked amongst the dems, right now. ----- For a while now, canadian media outletsu have been on the left side of things, even the right. And lies are as common as stars at night... "Court Packing" means CHANGING America's Supreme Court from a Judicial to a "banana" institution. Oh, thanks, my bad on that interpretation. |
Busterhymen
User ID: 78940028 United States 10/27/2020 06:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | People used to ask "Where's Hunter?" Quoting: Busterhymen Now everyone's asking..........."Where's Rudy?" posting here together from a cybercafé in Smolensk? Uh.........no, the U.S.A. Asking the question no one else does because they're too preoccupied by Hunter's cock. My focus is more on Joe and wondering where all these bombshell drops from Rudy went. Haven't heard a peep from him in over a week. Looks to me like Joe is gonna be Hillary 2.0............lose an election and walk free as a jay-bird for his remaining years. FCK the WEF! Keep your hands off my country! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 61315891 United States 10/27/2020 06:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Sungaze_At_Dawn
User ID: 78899308 Canada 10/27/2020 06:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 61315891 United States 10/27/2020 06:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | written by a source I have known for decades. Quoting: beeches MORE REASONS NOT TO ELECT BIDEN Some Republican notables abhor President Trump and urge us to support Joe Biden. Having known Biden slightly and observed him since the late 1960s I won’t do that. Despite Trump’s shortcomings there are strong reasons to support him and reject Biden. Some aspects, which apply legal ethics concepts, are made clear for the first time here. I’m a retired Delaware lawyer and a lifelong Republican, I first met Biden in, I guess, 1969. He and I represented different defendants in a criminal case, and his work struck me as poorly done and/or not really done at all. I was not impressed, and he never afterward impressed me better. I don't believe in fairy tales, scripture references, or stories about Deleware lawyers. Are there any lawyers in Deleware, or is this one of those trick questions? Yes there's plenty, most of them suck. But there's a few who are damn good and have high profile clients. I think i know this man. He owned alot of... |
beeches
(OP) User ID: 78973486 United States 10/27/2020 06:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I live in DE and i think i might know this lawyer... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 61315891 Smart man for sure. He had business dealings in a field i worked in. He knows DE politics 100%. may be ! the case he and Biden both defended folks on was when Joe was on County Council. They were both appointed as defenders due to the large number of defendants in the case. he wrote some for the local newspaper ages ago. if you know him, you and I are both lucky! Liberalism is totalitarianism with a human face – Thomas Sowell |
beeches
(OP) User ID: 78973486 United States 10/27/2020 06:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | written by a source I have known for decades. Quoting: beeches MORE REASONS NOT TO ELECT BIDEN Some Republican notables abhor President Trump and urge us to support Joe Biden. Having known Biden slightly and observed him since the late 1960s I won’t do that. Despite Trump’s shortcomings there are strong reasons to support him and reject Biden. Some aspects, which apply legal ethics concepts, are made clear for the first time here. I’m a retired Delaware lawyer and a lifelong Republican, I first met Biden in, I guess, 1969. He and I represented different defendants in a criminal case, and his work struck me as poorly done and/or not really done at all. I was not impressed, and he never afterward impressed me better. I don't believe in fairy tales, scripture references, or stories about Deleware lawyers. Are there any lawyers in Deleware, or is this one of those trick questions? Yes there's plenty, most of them suck. But there's a few who are damn good and have high profile clients. I think i know this man. He owned alot of... go on, laughing! Last Edited by beeches on 10/27/2020 06:40 PM Liberalism is totalitarianism with a human face – Thomas Sowell |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79338671 United States 10/27/2020 07:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
beeches
(OP) User ID: 78973486 United States 10/27/2020 07:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I live in DE and i think i might know this lawyer... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 61315891 Smart man for sure. He had business dealings in a field i worked in. He knows DE politics 100%. How the hell BIG is the state of DE? I know RI is the smallest state. second smallest state three counties, count em most people live in the northernmost county Liberalism is totalitarianism with a human face – Thomas Sowell |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79086516 United States 10/27/2020 08:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
beeches
(OP) User ID: 78973486 United States 10/27/2020 08:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | yikes I typed in "auntie" and that was not fun! Last Edited by beeches on 10/27/2020 08:18 PM Liberalism is totalitarianism with a human face – Thomas Sowell |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 40213728 United States 10/27/2020 08:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | written by a source I have known for decades. Quoting: beeches MORE REASONS NOT TO ELECT BIDEN Some Republican notables abhor President Trump and urge us to support Joe Biden. Having known Biden slightly and observed him since the late 1960s I won’t do that. Despite Trump’s shortcomings there are strong reasons to support him and reject Biden. Some aspects, which apply legal ethics concepts, are made clear for the first time here. I’m a retired Delaware lawyer and a lifelong Republican, I first met Biden in, I guess, 1969. He and I represented different defendants in a criminal case, and his work struck me as poorly done and/or not really done at all. I was not impressed, and he never afterward impressed me better. I don't believe in fairy tales, scripture references, or stories about Deleware lawyers. Are there any lawyers in Deleware, or is this one of those trick questions? Says the evotard |
Treerat
User ID: 77220281 United States 10/27/2020 09:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
beeches
(OP) User ID: 78973486 United States 10/27/2020 09:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Trained Noticer
Forum Moderator User ID: 76014573 United States 10/28/2020 08:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
beeches
(OP) User ID: 78973486 United States 10/28/2020 08:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
beeches
(OP) User ID: 78973486 United States 10/28/2020 08:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
telling it straight
User ID: 79466675 United States 10/28/2020 08:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And to add to what an earlier poster said an this thread about court packing, dems are now modifying “packing” to include the possibility of “rotating judges off the supreme court” So they can move in the ones they want. They realize that the judge his appointment is for a lifetime but apparently when they look technically at the wording it doesn’t say anything about them having to stay on the supreme court for the life of their appointment. They think they can move the current charges off and put new ones on. They don’t have to go as far as packing the court by making DC and Puerto Rico states so they have the votes to do it. They think they can sidestep all that. Think about what this means for our country. Last Edited by telling it straight on 10/28/2020 08:50 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78185020 Canada 10/28/2020 08:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | written by a source I have known for decades. Quoting: beeches MORE REASONS NOT TO ELECT BIDEN Some Republican notables abhor President Trump and urge us to support Joe Biden. Having known Biden slightly and observed him since the late 1960s I won’t do that. Despite Trump’s shortcomings there are strong reasons to support him and reject Biden. Some aspects, which apply legal ethics concepts, are made clear for the first time here. I’m a retired Delaware lawyer and a lifelong Republican, I first met Biden in, I guess, 1969. He and I represented different defendants in a criminal case, and his work struck me as poorly done and/or not really done at all. I was not impressed, and he never afterward impressed me better. I don't believe in fairy tales, scripture references, or stories about Deleware lawyers. Are there any lawyers in Deleware, or is this one of those trick questions? Does not matter. The essence of the message is entirely true. Though Biden is far worse than described here. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70175159 United States 10/28/2020 09:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | the Kinnock moment referred to above: Quoting: beeches He began an Iowa speech, "I was thinking as I was coming over here, why is it that Joe Biden is the first in his family ever to go to a university? Why is it that my wife who is sitting out there in the audience is the first in her family to ever go to college? Is it because our fathers and mothers were not bright? Is it because I'm the first Biden in a thousand generations to get a college and a graduate degree that I was smarter than the rest? .... Those same people who read poetry and wrote poetry and taught me to sing verse? Is it that they didn't work very hard, my ancestors who worked in the coal mines of Northeast Pennsylvania and would come up after 12 hours and play football for four hours?" Not all of this was true. As the Almanac of American Politics reported, "Biden in dramatizing his background actually distorted it, for unlike Kinnock he did not rise from working class roots". But the inaccuracy wasn’t what caught the public eye. Biden had parroted the words of British politician Neil Kinnock, and a rival campaign caught him in the act. A videotape circulated showing Biden saying all this, and showing Kinnock earlier saying the same things in nearly identical words, about himself, his own wife and his own ancestors. As Newsweek reported, "on the evening news the video was devastating. It was especially creepy given the personal nature of the soliloquy". The late-night comics had a field day and the nation roared with laughter at Biden. This was no ordinary Biden “gaffe”; it towered above all the others, and still does. It made him the most ridiculous presidential candidate in U.S. history. |
beeches
(OP) User ID: 78973486 United States 10/28/2020 09:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78537041 United States 10/28/2020 09:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That is false, three ways. First, “court packing” has nothing to do with filling ordinary vacancies when a Justice dies or retires, as Trump has been doing. “Court packing” means increasing the size of the Supreme Court to create and fill new vacancies, for partisan reasons. That abnormal tactic was tried only once in our history, in the late 1930s, and was rejected. Some prominent Democrats say that tactic is now on the table again, and Biden does not deny it. He keeps evading the question whether he as President would wait for normal vacancies or would try instead to create new ones by increasing the size of the Court. Doing that for partisan purposes, or even threatening to do so, is a big deal. It could destroy or impair the Court’s independence and its ability to speak constitutional truth to power. That sinister tactic should not be on the table. Quoting: beeches The other thing that people fail to mention when it comes to "court packing" is it disregards the peoples last vote. People vote for multiple issues and WHO the President will appoint and who the Senate will confirm is another reason. A Republican President and Republican Senate was elected for this reason also. Because people know Presidents usually get one or two SC justices in their terms. The other party coming into power and creating new seats is nothing short of CHEATING and destroying the WILL of the people who elected the last President! |