The KRAKEN is the math. | |
Darvaeh
User ID: 77961693 United States 11/17/2020 07:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79048419 United States 11/17/2020 07:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76930201 Australia 11/17/2020 07:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
ClawIII
User ID: 76788141 United States 11/17/2020 08:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think they are going to go with the math to prove their case. Numbers don't lie. Quoting: Zions Fled Powell said they can mathematically show an algorithm was used to produce desired results. Its' back engineering. Now think if they back engineer the algorithm they can correct it to show actual results. A team of mathmaticalns won't be able to lie about this. Remember all the statisticians coming forward. They hav all disappeared. hmmmm [link to twitter.com (secure)] The fact there IS an algorithm is proof in itself. :Trump Reveal: |
Nipples McGee
User ID: 57938614 United States 11/17/2020 08:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Kraken is worthless crap. That's not worthy evidence. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76204646 Batting: 0 The hell it isn't. Thes type of forensics are used in court all time for wire fraud, money laundering, etc. It is hard evidence. Why do you think all math talk was stopped at twitter? They have it. This is the play. Think! They have the actual programmers who can show a replication of the algorithm working with the numbers inputed. then even better when they stopped the algorithm ws changed and they can show that. Gotcha! Kracken! Just because something can be hacked or used fraudulently is not proof that it was used. The events on election "flips" is not solid evidence either. All of this is mere circumstantial - nothing more. They need hardcore evidence, which they DO NOT HAVE... How do you know? They have the code so it's just a matter of identifying it, which trump's legal team claims that they have been able to do. We have not been shown the evidence, so sure we're all speculating, but it's just difficult to believe that there would be this many naturally occurring anomalies all benefitting one candidate. Last Edited by Nipples McGee on 11/17/2020 08:02 PM Nipples McGee |
Zions Fled
(OP) User ID: 77838918 United States 11/17/2020 08:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So............when does the dam burst? When does all of this come out to he point that the MSM can't ignore it any longer? Or does that never happen and we've just been chasing a phantom here. Quoting: Busterhymen My theory is the endgame was always about the Supreme Court. These small case were just about gathering evidence time. Now Powell and Giulianni have come out today and said supreme court needs to take this. Now Powell is releasing her evidence to put pressure upon the court to take it. They have to as this is a once en history thing that they will be eternally remembered for. |
Captain KC Jones
User ID: 73366198 United States 11/17/2020 08:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think they are going to go with the math to prove their case. Numbers don't lie. Quoting: Zions Fled Powell said they can mathematically show an algorithm was used to produce desired results. Its' back engineering. Now think if they back engineer the algorithm they can correct it to show actual results. A team of mathmaticalns won't be able to lie about this. Remember all the statisticians coming forward. They hav all disappeared. hmmmm [link to twitter.com (secure)] ABSOLUTE NONSENSE!!! Numbers and statistics can be manipulated to conclude anything! Ridiculous! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79651276 United States 11/17/2020 08:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
akaSuzanne
User ID: 78185358 United States 11/17/2020 08:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have tried to post this three times and it won't let me. Look at the text box of this July 2018 video by a cryptic youtuber who started posting a few weeks before Q. This appears to be code relating to Dominion software. Q Downloading Cyber Fraud Systems (counter dominion) |
MPG
User ID: 76542202 Slovenia 11/17/2020 08:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Coy
User ID: 75531202 United States 11/17/2020 08:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Weyoun
User ID: 78625468 United States 11/17/2020 08:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Nipples McGee
User ID: 57938614 United States 11/17/2020 08:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So............when does the dam burst? When does all of this come out to he point that the MSM can't ignore it any longer? Or does that never happen and we've just been chasing a phantom here. Quoting: Busterhymen My theory is the endgame was always about the Supreme Court. These small case were just about gathering evidence time. Now Powell and Giulianni have come out today and said supreme court needs to take this. Now Powell is releasing her evidence to put pressure upon the court to take it. They have to as this is a once en history thing that they will be eternally remembered for. I think I heard that they need 4 justices to agree. The evidence they submit to the scotus will be far more extensive and detailed than what the lower courts heard. The Dominion reveal will give Trump a second term. The shenanigans in Philly, Atlanta etc will lead to new federal election security bills. Hell who knows, maybe republicans took the house when this is all said and done. Nipples McGee |
ICF
User ID: 19577834 United States 11/17/2020 08:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Zions Fled
(OP) User ID: 77838918 United States 11/17/2020 08:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Kraken is worthless crap. That's not worthy evidence. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76204646 Batting: 0 The hell it isn't. Thes type of forensics are used in court all time for wire fraud, money laundering, etc. It is hard evidence. Why do you think all math talk was stopped at twitter? They have it. This is the play. Think! They have the actual programmers who can show a replication of the algorithm working with the numbers inputed. then even better when they stopped the algorithm ws changed and they can show that. Gotcha! Kracken! Just because something can be hacked or used fraudulently is not proof that it was used. The events on election "flips" is not solid evidence either. All of this is mere circumstantial - nothing more. They need hardcore evidence, which they DO NOT HAVE... Excuse me they only need to prove a fraudulent election. in one one state. and it cancel alll. vitiates look it up. The statistics have shown that this is impossible. The codes to show the cheating can be replicated. This just the tip of the iceberg to wha they have You starting to get it. dna evidens is used in the same manner. As is number all the time to prove crimes. |
Zions Fled
(OP) User ID: 77838918 United States 11/17/2020 08:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Zions Fled
(OP) User ID: 77838918 United States 11/17/2020 08:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Come on someone this is pin worthy. If a team of mathematicians stood up and told you this was a statistical impossibility then wouldn't that count???? Quoting: Zions Fled Physics showed 9/11 is impossibility. And? Impossible officially happened. Another foreign poster. Are you really Slovenian or Chinese? are you one those k pop dudes. Worry about own country. |
Nipples McGee
User ID: 57938614 United States 11/17/2020 08:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think they are going to go with the math to prove their case. Numbers don't lie. Quoting: Zions Fled Powell said they can mathematically show an algorithm was used to produce desired results. Its' back engineering. Now think if they back engineer the algorithm they can correct it to show actual results. A team of mathmaticalns won't be able to lie about this. Remember all the statisticians coming forward. They hav all disappeared. hmmmm [link to twitter.com (secure)] ABSOLUTE NONSENSE!!! Numbers and statistics can be manipulated to conclude anything! Ridiculous! Probability theory can be applied meaningfully in factfinding in legal cases and while it is considered circumstantial it is allowed in court. For example Donald Trump lost 69k votes in Michigan at the exact same time that Joe Biden gained the same exact number of votes. Now either somebody made a huge mistake, which they have not explained or an algorithim switched the votes. The only other possibility is that Biden scored 138k consecutive votes while Trump got none. If you know probability then this is a coin flip. Biden and Trump both have a 1 in 2 chance or 1/2. So that's 1/2 x 1/2 x 1/2.......1/2 138,000 times. It's a higher probability than everyone hitting the lottery and getting struck by lightning on the same day. Circumstantial? Sure. But it is also a compelling statistic. Nipples McGee |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79174034 Canada 11/17/2020 08:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Come on someone this is pin worthy. If a team of mathematicians stood up and told you this was a statistical impossibility then wouldn't that count???? Quoting: Zions Fled Liberals hate math. reminds me of a photo that was going around a few years ago; cops were chasing a guy who had a sign that said 2+2 = 4. and evey other sign in the city said 2+2 = 5. |
Franz424
User ID: 79649183 United States 11/17/2020 08:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think they are going to go with the math to prove their case. Numbers don't lie. Quoting: Zions Fled Powell said they can mathematically show an algorithm was used to produce desired results. Its' back engineering. Now think if they back engineer the algorithm they can correct it to show actual results. A team of mathmaticalns won't be able to lie about this. Remember all the statisticians coming forward. They hav all disappeared. hmmmm [link to twitter.com (secure)] ABSOLUTE NONSENSE!!! Numbers and statistics can be manipulated to conclude anything! Ridiculous! An algorithm of a certain appearance with specific parameters cannot be manipulated to conclude "anything". We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit. -- Aristotle |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76760905 United States 11/17/2020 08:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79174034 Canada 11/17/2020 08:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think they are going to go with the math to prove their case. Numbers don't lie. Quoting: Zions Fled Powell said they can mathematically show an algorithm was used to produce desired results. Its' back engineering. Now think if they back engineer the algorithm they can correct it to show actual results. A team of mathmaticalns won't be able to lie about this. Remember all the statisticians coming forward. They hav all disappeared. hmmmm [link to twitter.com (secure)] ABSOLUTE NONSENSE!!! Numbers and statistics can be manipulated to conclude anything! Ridiculous! Probability theory can be applied meaningfully in factfinding in legal cases and while it is considered circumstantial it is allowed in court. For example Donald Trump lost 69k votes in Michigan at the exact same time that Joe Biden gained the same exact number of votes. Now either somebody made a huge mistake, which they have not explained or an algorithim switched the votes. The only other possibility is that Biden scored 138k consecutive votes while Trump got none. If you know probability then this is a coin flip. Biden and Trump both have a 1 in 2 chance or 1/2. So that's 1/2 x 1/2 x 1/2.......1/2 138,000 times. It's a higher probability than everyone hitting the lottery and getting struck by lightning on the same day. Circumstantial? Sure. But it is also a compelling statistic. Joe biden and communists reads this and say , so you’re telling me there is a chance ! |
Franz424
User ID: 79649183 United States 11/17/2020 08:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Kraken is worthless crap. That's not worthy evidence. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76204646 Batting: 0 The hell it isn't. Thes type of forensics are used in court all time for wire fraud, money laundering, etc. It is hard evidence. Why do you think all math talk was stopped at twitter? They have it. This is the play. Think! They have the actual programmers who can show a replication of the algorithm working with the numbers inputed. then even better when they stopped the algorithm ws changed and they can show that. Gotcha! Kracken! Just because something can be hacked or used fraudulently is not proof that it was used. The events on election "flips" is not solid evidence either. All of this is mere circumstantial - nothing more. They need hardcore evidence, which they DO NOT HAVE... How do you know? They have the code so it's just a matter of identifying it, which trump's legal team claims that they have been able to do. We have not been shown the evidence, so sure we're all speculating, but it's just difficult to believe that there would be this many naturally occurring anomalies all benefitting one candidate. It's biased in a manner that is past a statistical expectation one would reasonably expect from a database, etc. When a scientific analysis is done. We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit. -- Aristotle |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77119396 United States 11/17/2020 08:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Nipples McGee
User ID: 57938614 United States 11/17/2020 08:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think they are going to go with the math to prove their case. Numbers don't lie. Quoting: Zions Fled Powell said they can mathematically show an algorithm was used to produce desired results. Its' back engineering. Now think if they back engineer the algorithm they can correct it to show actual results. A team of mathmaticalns won't be able to lie about this. Remember all the statisticians coming forward. They hav all disappeared. hmmmm [link to twitter.com (secure)] ABSOLUTE NONSENSE!!! Numbers and statistics can be manipulated to conclude anything! Ridiculous! An algorithm of a certain appearance with specific parameters cannot be manipulated to conclude "anything". Exactly, that section of the source code will show that there was an algorithim that either switched individual votes or switched batches of votes based on a designed ratio. Pa was supposed to be close so a bunch of consecutive batches coming in at 51-49 looks reasonable optically. Va was supposed to be solid blue so a 54-44 ratio also seems reasonable. But the algorithim when demonstrated in a courtroom will show that it will give the ratio it was programmed to ALWAYS! Nipples McGee |
ToSeek
User ID: 9653749 United States 11/17/2020 08:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So............when does the dam burst? When does all of this come out to he point that the MSM can't ignore it any longer? Or does that never happen and we've just been chasing a phantom here. Quoting: Busterhymen When at least one court makes a major finding in favor of the Trump campaign. That has yet to happen. |
President-Elect Revbo™
User ID: 79418380 United States 11/17/2020 08:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Kraken is worthless crap. That's not worthy evidence. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76204646 Batting: 0 The hell it isn't. Thes type of forensics are used in court all time for wire fraud, money laundering, etc. It is hard evidence. Why do you think all math talk was stopped at twitter? They have it. This is the play. Think! They have the actual programmers who can show a replication of the algorithm working with the numbers inputed. then even better when they stopped the algorithm ws changed and they can show that. Gotcha! Kracken! We need a Kraken gif that does this. John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. |
Moon&Stars
User ID: 29184782 United States 11/17/2020 08:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There was a video here several days ago that a guy showing and explaining the code, state by state. He broke it down so simply, you wouldn't have to understand code to see it. It was that obvious. These people are stupid to think it wouldn't be discovered. Their biggest mistake was pulling this stunt with Trump. His crowds were in the tens of thousands. Biden's were less than 10. Vote/election fraud to steal it was pure idiocy. Moonstar |
Nipples McGee
User ID: 57938614 United States 11/17/2020 08:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think they are going to go with the math to prove their case. Numbers don't lie. Quoting: Zions Fled Powell said they can mathematically show an algorithm was used to produce desired results. Its' back engineering. Now think if they back engineer the algorithm they can correct it to show actual results. A team of mathmaticalns won't be able to lie about this. Remember all the statisticians coming forward. They hav all disappeared. hmmmm [link to twitter.com (secure)] ABSOLUTE NONSENSE!!! Numbers and statistics can be manipulated to conclude anything! Ridiculous! Probability theory can be applied meaningfully in factfinding in legal cases and while it is considered circumstantial it is allowed in court. For example Donald Trump lost 69k votes in Michigan at the exact same time that Joe Biden gained the same exact number of votes. Now either somebody made a huge mistake, which they have not explained or an algorithim switched the votes. The only other possibility is that Biden scored 138k consecutive votes while Trump got none. If you know probability then this is a coin flip. Biden and Trump both have a 1 in 2 chance or 1/2. So that's 1/2 x 1/2 x 1/2.......1/2 138,000 times. It's a higher probability than everyone hitting the lottery and getting struck by lightning on the same day. Circumstantial? Sure. But it is also a compelling statistic. Joe biden and communists reads this and say , so you’re telling me there is a chance ! There's a better chance of Hunter Biden being locked in a room full of crack and to not come out high an hour later, but yeah sure technically there is a chance. Nipples McGee |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79369439 United States 11/17/2020 08:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am not a coder but I understand some basics. Quoting: Nipples McGee In Va and Pa after votes were moved to Biden where he took the lead every consecutive ballot batch was of the same ratio 54-44 for Biden in Va and 51-49 in Pa. Codes are mostly "if" & "then" statements. Going through the code to look for a program that more or less says If input greater than 0 then 54% = Biden and 44% = Trump. Obviously that is not the code, I haven't done it in years but that is the gist of it. They should be able to find such a code. Of course if the deep state really went this route I assume they hired genius coders who might be able to pull some next level abracadabra crap. I believe that this system was designed for remote access, so that a person or team could access the system, analyze the data that was being output in real time, drop subroutines to fix the result, and allow those subroutines to be taken with them when they ended their remote access. The code you are talking about might not exist in the machines, but something in it would be shown to allow for the remote access. If someone else was independently watching the data streams coming into and out of the voting machines during the remote access, then they would probably see those subroutines being dropped for use at a certain time, and pulled back with them before the connection was terminated, and those drops would match certain trends that appeared in the vote tallies, after the subroutine was dropped into the machine remotely. |