Pin? Here is WHY I honestly think the Powell Court Document Had An Intentional Typo!

First light of hope were fake watermarks now a typo. Please

Yes, I agree with this theory. If using Occam’s razor, the fewer leaps we have to make in figuring out why, the more likely the scenario.

Uhuh....seems the last time this whole typo issue cropped up was that doc having Corney instead of Comey. Made it hell to do a global search for the ass-hat.

That woman is super fuckin' crafty so let's see where this goes. No such thing as an honest typo.

Case in point...friend of mine was a paralegal and was fixin' to quit her job working for a serious dick head attorney. She prepped an important filing and purposefully substituted word public with pubic (one missing letter makes a huge difference here). She LOL at him when he got around to callin' her to scream over the phone at her last dig she pulled on him.

The topic of the this thread is bizarre speculation along the lines of that Q crap, but real watermarks were referenced in the GA petition.

Typos...her team worked right until deadline submission and ran out of time or the paralegal tasked with spell check and proofreading experienced a massive fail.

Intentional? IMO, no.

.

Now the dominion election systems were found to have the word RepubIican spelled incorrectly, Republican, rather...

This allowed all those votes to not be counted as republican, because they were counted as RepubIican and not Republican.

Or 37337 h4xx0r R3Pu|3|_1<@/\/....

Litte joke, anyway...


What if the court documebt typo was intentional to force a semantical linguistic legal arguement...


That if the typo is pointed out and disputed any, or if the document isnt accepted due to a misspelling... That it can be argued that is spelling accuracy is REQUIRED for the document for the document to be accepted LEGALLY or to not be criticised then that TYPOs on VOTING MACHINES and Ballots
ALSO cant be accepted or must be audited and found as to which ballots are official and legitimate and which are fraudulent...


Based on INTENTIONAL misspellings to confuse voting software or allow PURPOSEFUL loopholes in the voting code for tge purpose of illegal vote manipulation.




BOOM!!!!!!

Whoa!


Good call!

This is comedy gold. Now trumps typos are intentional. Give ma a fucking break!

Many incriminating documents have typos so the search engines won't find matching references.

So you're saying OP misspelled "document" on purpose?

Again


If typos are brought into question in the court.. Or the legal people say it looks sloppy.. Or doesnt accept it because of typos...


Couldnt they argue the election was sloppy? Argue that typos on voting machines should disbarr the election from being accepted or warranting a vote check or spell check of the machines etc...


Ths art of law..


They craft legal arguements thats how it works.




Very very clever.

Another thought could be that the typo is intentional to make more people comment on the document. Retweet it and then getting more people to look at the thing that would not have looked at it.

you people really are a bunch of jackasses. a typo is a disrespectful to the court and it's just plain sloppy. plus she didn't use properly spaced words or lines of text. all that signals to a judge is she is sloppy and haphazard and not to be taken seriously.

grow the fuck up already.

Another thought could be that the typo is intentional to make more people comment on the document. Retweet it and then getting more people to look at the thing that would not have looked at it.

But why did she have typos in other places, like in the header and the word Distric being misspelled twice?

Or all the incorrectly formated parts of the document. Or the tons of other typos. Or spots where she had no spaces for an entire sentence.

Must be more Trump code talk. Couldn't be anything else.