Question: can anyone name even one of Trump's election fraud lawsuits with evidence of significant voter fraud that has survived in court?

Doesn't matter because he only needs the Texas case.

Well the Trump team only had lawsuits in 4 states, it’s not the 51 number people keep posting as those are individual citizens who filed.

But to your point I am unsure if the incidents of fractional votes has been submitted and that is irrefutable fraud.

Whatever. Can you name even one of Trump's election fraud lawsuits with evidence of significant voter fraud that has survived in court?

In other words, evidence of vote fraud doesn't matter when you advocate stealing the election from the American people with the Texas case.

And who do you think paid for the lawyers and supported the state lawsuits that required a resident to file the case? Trump for President, Inc. couldn't be a plaintiff for those.

Regardless, as far as I know, they have all been either withdrawn or tossed out and zero evidence of significant vote fraud has been introduced with ANY of the lawsuits to date.

Witch hunt much?

So far, Trump's legal team seems to be losing bigly.

Nice memes.

Looks like you can't name any of Trump's election fraud lawsuits with evidence of significant voter fraud that has survived in court.

All of these cases have significant evidence. The issue could be you are not familiar with what constitutes evidence. The affidavits are chilling. Then additional evidence will be presented in court. Shredded and dumped ballots are enough evidence for me. Then there’s the lack of transparency in counting. Dominion won’t respond to state legislatures.

The 4 states in question stole the election from the American people by not following the constitutions rules on elections. It's a fairly simple suit. Will it work? Not for me to say.

No, Supreme Court has not heard and appeal any of Trump's baseless, evidence-free lawsuits that have been tossed out of court.

They did unanimously reject this one, though:

https://twitter.com/_/status/1336430349077913604

There are none but the argument will be " the courts are corrupt" with no proof to back that either...

It has been more than a month since the election with more than 50 lawsuits filed that claim election fraud.

So can you name even one of Trump's election fraud lawsuits with evidence of significant voter fraud that has survived in court?

OP - the support of the courts in each state is not expected for any of this. Grow a Brian.





Last Edited by Butch DeFeo on 12/09/2020 08:34 PM

OK, so the explainer is that all the courts hearing all the lawsuits that have been tossed out are corrupt.



Wow, that's quite the conspiracy.

The question is:

Can you name even one of Trump's election fraud lawsuits with evidence of significant voter fraud that has survived in court?

No, you cannot.

It doesn’t matter because some of the judges are corrupt. Donald Trump will be President because fraud was perpetrated on his campaign. He will find his relief with the Supreme Court.

It wasn’t the Trump team dumdum.

And what does it tell you that they didn’t introduce everything?

Unless you solely watch the MSM you would have seen the ballot entries that are fractional. This is an impossibility with a vote as it is a whole number, so how would there be entries showing Biden getting like 15,123.66 votes? Because an algorithm was used to give a specific ratio to each candidate.

How would you explain the fractional votes?

So you keep posting memes but you can't name name even one of Trump's election fraud lawsuits with evidence of significant voter fraud that has survived in court?

Thanks for confirming that.

Show us the beef. Where is the evidence?

Back to OP's question:

Can you name even one of Trump's election fraud lawsuits with evidence of significant voter fraud that has survived in court?

I don't need you.

You need desperately to believe Biden will win.

That's your problem, not mine.

I admit I can't.

But I can name one 14 year old niece Hunter would like to fold laundry for in the whole foods bathroom at 5 am.

So there is no evidence to support Trump's claims of a massive vote fraud conspiracy.

But whatabout Hunter's laptop.

so one of two things are happening

either thousands of eye witness who testified to seeing fraud, are lying

or a handful of judges are either corrupt or don't want to influence a national election

which one do you think is more likely?

Nothing is "headed to the Supreme Court". The only case that was appealed to SCOTUS was unanimously rejected.

And you still can't name name even one of Trump's election fraud lawsuits with evidence of significant voter fraud that has survived in court.

there is evidence

for starter's all ballots taken in after nov 3 midnight are unconstitutional

second, second there is no verification process to authenticate mail in ballots

finally the election was to be held on 1 day, and 1 day only, trump had a clear lead the night of nov 3, only days later did the states start to flip

the fraud is obvious

now add in the thousands of eyewitness testimonies and the vote count irregularities, and it's a clear cut case of fraud

I am willing to sign an affidavit that I saw you excuse incestuous child molestation if ever asked.

More than 50 lawsuits have been filed claiming election irregularities and not one of them has presented any evidence of significant election fraud.

I think it's likely there is no basis to support the claims.

Witch hunt.

the PA case was not rejected, you are spreading fake news

there are other cases pending that are indeed going before the supreme court, not just PA

you did see that video from the ballots under that table? I Wonder about your reaction.

Didn't Soros put AGs and Judges in business across the country?