Question: can anyone name even one of Trump's election fraud lawsuits with evidence of significant voter fraud that has survived in court?

Back to OP's question:

Can you name even one of Trump's election fraud lawsuits with evidence of significant voter fraud that has survived in court?

Pretty obvious by now that you can't answer the question.

Witch hunt.

The "Chinese shill" excuse?

So can you name even one of Trump's election fraud lawsuits with evidence of significant voter fraud that has survived in court?

Essential facts of election:

-Biden won 7 million more votes than Trump

-He won 306 electoral votes and all 50 states have certified their elections

-So far the Trump team has lost 53 cases in court

-Trump found zero credible evidence of fraud

-His legal team has presented zero credible evidence of fraud in court

-In functioning democracy every Republican would have recognized the Biden win by now

-GLP would be shitting white hot roofing nails an d Trump would be on a month long tweet rant had Trump won and the Democrats were trying to throw the election like this

For example, not one scintilla of evidence has been presented in court to support any of these claims.

https://twitter.com/_/status/1336735078202961922

[crickets]

Nobody so far and this has been up since yesterday.

Another one tossed out with no evidence.

Thread: Federal Judge Tosses Arizona Election Challenge: ‘Sorely Wanting of Relevant or Reliable Evidence’

We cannot normalize how totally insane it is that Trump, 18 state AGs & 106 House Republicans still trying to overturn election 37 days after, when Biden won by 7 million votes, 306 electoral votes certified, Trump campaign lost 55 court cases and still haven't presented no evidence of fraud.

Sad.

For a lawsuit to be successful, the judge has to hear the evidence. Thus far, no one has.

What public opinion? You mean on election day when Trump lost by 7 million votes? That public opinion?

Dozens of lawsuits have been heard. Not one has won on evidence.

For example:

Thread: BREAKING: Nevada court DISMISSES with prejudice Trump Election Contest. "No credible and relevant evidence to substantiate any of the grounds

Thread: Federal Judge Tosses Arizona Election Challenge: ‘Sorely Wanting of Relevant or Reliable Evidence’

Yes...Supreme Court.

And you're stillall memes,no evidence b

Here's another one that got tossed out today due to lack of any facts or evidence:

Thread: BREAKING: Another loss - Federal judge rejects Trump campaign lawsuit in Wisconsin. "Fail as a matter of law & fact"

Supreme Court?

How's that working out for ya so far?

And the judge who wrote that opinion, Judge Brett Ludwig, was appointed by Donald Trump eight months ago.

Still just crickets.

lol

Can you name even one of Trump's election fraud lawsuits with evidence of significant voter fraud that has survived in court?

No you cannot.

The American people have spoke and the orange anus is going to be forcibly removed on Jan 20th.

Blah blah blah shill... That's old hat trumpbot, face reality your orange man baby god is a LOSER just like you.

Any reasonable person that looks at the available evidence, can see there is obvious FRAUD, unquestionable FRAUD.

The other question would be whether it was "significant", define whatever significant is going to quantify, and we are getting somewhere.

Here's some "Proof" - they have some top-notch lawyers working on the issue.

So far not even one "Court" will give this even cursory review, they have ALL rejected it without even looking.

What does ("That") tell you?

?

Back to OP's question:

Can you name even one of Trump's election fraud lawsuits with evidence of significant voter fraud that has survived in court?

Seems like your answer is "no", right?

It doesn't matter what has survived in court up to this point because they have the concrete evidence that our ballots went outside of the US. See Trumps executive order and you will know why. You will soon see he is just waiting for the right moment to get every last one of them that he can. Nothing can save them, NOTHING.

He will step down.

Trump put a bunch of those people into the SCOTUS and he did that on purpose. Everything the left has tried to pull on Trump has failed even with the CIA, the House and media behind them. And during that time he kept many of his promises. I love that you think he is stupid. He doesn't need SCOTUS as this will go to the military court. The left has always been to arrogant to see who the real leader is. Not for much longer.

You see before Trump ran for president the left and Hollyweird loved him. He was on every talk show in the news and a donor to democrats. He learned about Epstein and tried to turn him in but he learned how corrupt everything was. If you dig into it you will find Epstein was banned from all of his properties after no one would go after him. He hob knobbed with all of them and was disgusted and that is when he decided that he would take them down. Just wait and see the swamp is going to be drained. Of course you TDS tards are smarter than him it's why you are more successful than him. He has lost more money than all you idiots will make in your life combined and came back from it lol. SHow us what you have done lol.

Last Edited by Str8outaRutland on 12/13/2020 12:33 AM

Fact is that, so far, no court has found a single instance of election fraud.