Question: can anyone name even one of Trump's election fraud lawsuits with evidence of significant voter fraud that has survived in court?

Are you people fucking retarded?! I want to strap each one of you cunts in a chair like clockwork orange and make you watch and listen to hours and hours and hours of evidence and witness testimony. You people are mongaloids but Trump will save you from CCP too.

Can you name even one of Trump's election fraud lawsuits with evidence of significant voter fraud that has survived in court?

The answer is NO because

(1) not one of the cases was about significant voter fraud
(2) not all cases that have been in front of the courts were from Trump and his team
(3) and the because of corrupt judges


So...

No, no one can name even one of Trump's election fraud lawsuits with evidence of significant voter fraud that has survived in court.

My question now to you -

So with my answer, does that mean that there was not massive election fraud?




I answered your question care to respond?

As of today:

https://twitter.com/_/status/1338695279357407232

Still true today and all the lawsuits are finished.

Thread: BREAKING: Wisconsin Supreme Court REJECTS Trump appeal of his recount loss. ALL SIGNIFICANT POST-ELECTION CASES HAVE NOW BEEN DECIDED.

Zero evidence, and still no evidence shown in court yet.

Yep, that kisn of kills the standard shills' copy and paste statement that no judge allowed to hear any presentation of evidence in any court, doesn't it?

Federal judge Stephanos Bibas pulled no punches when he issued a scathing opinion last Saturday rejecting the Trump campaign’s latest attempt to overturn the outcome of the November 3 presidential election.

“Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so,” Bibas wrote in a 21-page ruling dismissing a lawsuit that sought to stop the certification of Pennsylvania's voting results.

“Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

[link to www.voanews.com (secure)]


On June 19, 2017, Donald J Trump nominated Bibas to serve as a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. On November 2, 2017, his nomination was confirmed by the United States Senate by a vote of 53–43.

Another one today.

Thread: Today: Nevada's Republican Secretary of State says "we have yet to see any evidence of wide-spread fraud" in the 2020 election."

Still crickets.

Even Ol' Reliable Newsmax can't come up with anything

Thread: Newsmax airs 2-minute video admitting it has 'no evidence' of outlandish fraud claims against 2 voting-machine companies

Same situation as of today.

No evidence.

[imgur] [link to i.imgur.com (secure)]

So here’s what happened with Sidney Powell's evidence-free Dominion kraken lawsuits...

Sidney Powell’s Michigan Lawsuit Gets Shut Down In Court. "those conspiracy theories were not based on any actual evidence."



A Michigan lawsuit seeking to overturn the state’s election results led by former Trump advisor Sidney Powell suffered a key failure in federal court Monday, as the judge denounced her conspiracy theories based around Dominion voting machines as “nothing but speculation and conjecture,” marking the first of Powell’s battleground state lawsuits to fail in court and the latest in a string of losses in the GOP’s post-election cases challenging President-elect Joe Biden’s win.

Powell filed lawsuits in Michigan and other battleground states alleging widespread fraud that justifies de-certifying the state’s election results, claiming without evidence that machines from Dominion Voting Systems flipped votes from President Donald Trump to Biden.

U.S. District Court Judge Linda V. Parker made clear in her ruling, which rejected Powell’s request for injunctive relief, that those conspiracy theories were not based on any actual evidence, noting that the plaintiffs did not actually give proof that any votes were flipped, but rather brought “an amalgamation of theories, conjecture, and speculation that such alterations were possible.”

"To be perfectly clear, Plaintiffs’ equal protection claim is not supported by any allegation that Defendants’ alleged schemes caused votes for President Trump to be changed to votes for Vice President Biden,” Parker wrote, noting their affidavits used words like “believe” and “may” that did not substantively show any wrongdoing took place.

[link to www.forbes.com (secure)]

Still waiting.

Here's the deal...

The straight dope...

There might have been enough cheating to put Dems over the top...

(There was definitely cheating.)


But Trump didn't necessarily believe that.

That's the God-damned truth...if the truth matters.

I dunno, this guy could at last have conclusive evidence of massive election fraud

https://twitter.com/_/status/1337169900348055552