Trump vs. Biden - Wisconsin Supreme Court (TODAY 12/12/20) brief update!

No, I saw the end. Chief Justice called an end to the hearing, and set a time later this afternoon for the Justices to meet privately.

I guess the bribes and threats need to occur off camera?

Yes, mine ended too!

Yup , another failed attempt.

Because I know many on GLP do not have the time nor desire to watch a trial case, here is my quick opinion.

Although we would EXPECT our JUDGES to simply deal with the LAW, and RULE on such LAW without bias; in this case, that is clearly NOT the case.

The Judges in the opening part of this case are seething with ANGER and POLITICAL BIAS! They cannot even control their emotions. They are PISSED! And they are clearly Radical-Left Libtard Biden supporters. They can't even hide their bias.

They DO NOT care about the law, nor legal argument. This is a political cat fight, and nothing less.

This case will NOT be decided upon the rule and interpretation of the law. Judges do not make laws, they interpret law. That's it!

But now, Judges are mostly political hacks, blackmailed and bribed bitches, and/or ignorant and stupid.

A few good Judges still exist. In this case (video) the older female Judges are patient, they control their emotions, and they focus on legal issues. When they start to speak, and provide logic and reason (which is what the law requires)...

BOOM...that's when the video STOPPED!

You are not supposed to see a rational, legal, argument.

THIS IS ALL ABOUT EMOTION!

DON'T YOU EVIL TRUMP RACISTS UNDERSTAND!
TRUMP IS FUCKING EVIL
AND YOU ARE EVIL
AND I HATE YOU
JUST LEAVE BIDEN ALONE
WE WANT KAMALA HARRIS TO BE OUR FIRST 'BLACK' FEMALE PRESIDENT....
HILLARY SHOULD HAVE BEEN PRESIDENT, AND NONE OF THIS WOULD BE HAPPENING RIGHT NOW.

There is no reason for the Justices to meet in private...unless?

I bet a phone call is being made to George Soros.

"Hey George, I need another $250,000 deposited in my Grand Cayman account right now. And I'll make sure Biden wins Wisconsin.

Thanks George, you're the best!"

Yes the political bias and not even wanting to get into the evidence, was obvious.

But nonetheless. They had tons of evidence, and votes that were evident of fraud in Wisconsin and it would more than change the outcome. And didn't understand why Trump's lawyer didn't have a list of affidavit witnesses pertaining to many different types of illegal activity, and the stats, there were many stats, on this election, on the votes that were out of control huge amounts of immobile people, over 100 000, with under 40 000 roughly last time. I didn't see him producing evidence.

He was just relying on the rules in the law.

And when do dems do that? And dems run these courts.

At the investigation in the legislature, tons of proof and witnesses and evidence was mentioned, so why not a complete case in the Supreme Court.

She asked him about evidence.

I found it completely lacking, half ass effort.

Last Edited by Sungaze_At_Dawn on 12/12/2020 03:53 PM