Learn the True Nature of Your Reality from the Messenger

I've spent 40 years studying The Bible.

What do you think you have to tell me about it?

How old are you?

I'm not. You're making that up :)

You've asked but a couple of questions that made sense, the main one of which presents a logical fallacy.



Just because you said it, it doesn't mean it is true.

You're here on my thread arguing with me while saying that such topics aren't contentious :)

Why not be peaceful, instead? Or, if not, just friendly. Wouldn't that help?



A logical fallacy. I suppose if I don't answer this then you'll say I'm Satan :)



Will this be an other question you say I am avoiding?

You're perfectly welcome to have a reasonable conversation, if you'd like. I'm all for it.

...

<<Most reading this will reject what is said on these pages. Most of us are not ready to see reality for how it is, but are quick to subscribe to the world that the 'deceivers' have been wanting us to see.

And that is exactly why the time is at hand.
...
If you’re not careful, you will end up defending the deception. I do not hesitate to say that most of us will do exactly that. The ‘truth’ is most uncomfortable for all but a few. If it wasn’t it would be easy to see and know.
...
The people keeping us from this greater reality are not evil or Satanic but are, instead, our next-door neighbors, friends, and those we love. They will hold on to the world of deception as much as they can and will insist that you do, as well. We are all afraid of our own truer nature, some much more than others. We claim to want it but choose something else entirely, again and again. We are the lost ones, but our situation is not impossible to change.>>

You've spent a couple years reading several things you've come across all shitting on The Bible, right?

Therefore, you are some informed opinion that The Bible is bad and you are better, right?

You're mocking someone that wants to help improve the state of the world while you... don't.

Think about that.

But rather than argue, how about we have a more productive conversation?

Would you like that?

Satan approves your every word.

Hey OP thanks, but you did not say anything of substance beyond the truth vs perception message which I get.

Do you have more to share or is this the core of it? Your OP hyped me but then I kept reading and missed the meat.

We are co- creators of this reality, the time it takes to actualise your reality in your life shows the level of advancement you have. The longer it takes the more removed you are from your creative self. True creators can actualise anything almost instantly.

I am also interested in your point about our history. I also feel most of it is fake or distorted to promote a certain view.

You are evil masquerading as good.

You almost fool yourself.

Almost.

But no one else.

No one.

There are two kinds of Bibles.

Those produced before ~1530
and those produced after

Would you like to know the difference?

Rather than argue more about it (even though I would not like to), how about we just say it's a contentious topic and leave it at that?

Have you not seen the last few pages?

OP is absolutely bankrupt of intelligible substance.

No. You are AntiChrist, AntiGod, AntiBible

however you choose to attempt to justify it to yourself.

Here. Show us the difference.

[link to www.blbclassic.org (secure)]

Here.

Go here and look at the Dead Sea Scrolls

and then look at today's text exactly the same

and then try to explain your God-hating Bible-hating bullshit to someone else...

This is not a productive argument.

Perhaps one day we can speak in a more friendly and open-minded way.

You're free to say that I am not answering your questions so therefore ___________. I do not mind, but keep in mind that you are choosing to post to this thread out of many thousands of other threads.

Until then :)

Thanks for all of the bumps, by the way!

al lot of posts on the subject.
People subconsciously understand that the veil is thin. A bifurcation decide now which future is emanating.

Is there anyone here who thinks Jesus would refuse to read from a Bible that the cult of Satan has been translating, producing, and determining the contents of since the 16th century?

There are much older Bibles.

A contentious topic, if ever you wanted one: Who produced your Bible?

But, please, continue to judge others :)

why should we read if we can feel ?

Do you know that you can read the original languages

and the 1530 English doesn't matter?

Do you understand that?

It Is Difficult To Think Of What Is Actually Good

It is easier for us to think of 'good' not as things or actions that people think are good, but as the absence of 'evil'.

Is oxygen good, for example, if we need it to survive? Pure oxygen is unhealthy for us, and the air we breathe can cause harmful fungus to grow more easily, say, on a loaf of bread.

It is not possible to have clear definitions of good and evil that would be the same for everything everywhere.

However, we don't need a perfectly 'true' or universal definition of either. We just need something that is useful for its intended purpose.

'Good'' is what helps the survival of humanity
in the absence of harm to other persons.

'Bad' or 'evil' is what harms the survival of humanity
in the presence of harm to other persons

Ultimately, what is 'good' promotes an expanded view of self: You are what you perceive.

What is 'bad' or 'evil' is what promotes a limited view of self: You are not what you perceive.

That is why we have the 'Golden Rule'. Treat others as you would treat yourself (because they are a part of who you really are)

Those who mean to deceive humanity have twisted the fundamental ethic of the Golden Rule into something that works in their favor. They would want you to believe that reciprocation, the most essential element that the Golden Rule encapsulates, is not about a fair exchange but about a life of paying back abstract debts to systems that they control. It is the primary method that they have used to enslave society and create more power for themselves.

The Golden Rule opens the door for others — particularly modern governments — to try to control our lives. They justify their actions with their interpretation: "we know what's best for you". And because people cannot do the same to them (e.g., impose tax on government) what results is complication, misery and, ultimately, evil. It also shifts the consequences of their actions and mistakes to a much later time (or perhaps even never).

But it is we who have lost our way because we have forgotten the essential meaning of the Golden Rule: treat others as you would treat yourself because they are an aspect of who you are.

Why did you think 1530n mattered so much for some reason?

Jesus never read English.

Yeshua never spoke English.

So what?

So what are you, like a bike messenger then?

I would only discuss it if someone else brought it up.

I know how many/most people get about it. Such topics give birth to endless arguments.

But, I would agree.

I wasn't referring to English, of course.

The cult of Satan encourages you to not feel or understand what you are sensing (for example, with social media). You are conditioned to believe that you are separate from nearly all of your reality. Ultimately, you will believe that the world you perceive comes from outside of you and thus you have no control over the way you interpret your own reality.

But the workings of 'evil' are wholly within our own perspective and depend entirely upon our interpretation of it. Our lack of desire to govern ourselves encourages Chaos to take over as much of our reality as it can.

The Universal Law is the way to a worldwide culture of self-governance and a return to the real world: the world of freedom and prosperity. The cult of Satan works very hard to hide this world from you and shows you a deceptive fiction while trying to convince you that no other way is possible. And it is exactly as we have chosen.

The Golden Rule, unfortunately, leads to more evil in the modern world, as it fosters an environment where people do not need to withstand the consequences of their actions because they are separated from them. Authorities, following the Golden Rule, do what they think is best for society without considering whether or not they themselves would want to experience it. For example, banks do not need to pay the interest they create for others, lawmakers do not need to bear the consequences of their own laws, corporations can act with impunity, someone can click a button and hurt another person without having to witness it. The list of ways the Golden Rule is incompatible with the modern world is as long as a globally-connected world is complex.