Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,671 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 722,588
Pageviews Today: 1,229,825Threads Today: 472Posts Today: 8,464
01:49 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

SCOTUS Needs to ISSUE a Court Injunction or a TEMPORARY HOLD on the Inauguration Day Ceremonies

 
Trump
User ID: 44769115
Canada
01/18/2021 10:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
SCOTUS Needs to ISSUE a Court Injunction or a TEMPORARY HOLD on the Inauguration Day Ceremonies
I light of new information comming out from the Peter Navarro Report which presents a "strong case" for election fraud, SCOTUS is obligated to issue a court injuction or temporary hold on the inauguration process.

They already dropped the ball once. (Corruption?)

If they do it again this could be seen as aiding a abetting a very serious crime.

I've linked to the Navarro Report below...


Here's the link to the Peter Navaro Report again..

[link to img1.wsimg.com (secure)]



Concluding Remarks

Based on this third and final volume of The Navarro Report, and as Figure Eight demonstrates, it should be clear that there are far more questions raised about the potential illegality of the 2020 presidential election than have been answered. Clearly, the case, evidence, and statistical receipts presented in this report provide a strong case that the 2020 election may well have been stolen not just from President Trump but also from the 74 million Americans who went to the ballot box in good faith in support of President Trump.
Figure Eight
In light of this evidence, it is impossible for anyone to claim that President Trump was in any way wrong in stoutly raising the question of election fraud and irregularities in the weeks following the November 3 election and in calling for his supporters to PEACEFULLY protest. Indeed, for the president not to rise to defend the integrity of the ballot box would have been a betrayal of the 74 million Americans who voted for the president thinking they were participating in what may well not have been a free and fair election.
In light of this evidence, it is also irresponsible – in the extreme – for the Democrat Party and its leadership, or journalists in the mainstream media, or RINO Republicans to claim there is no evidence of election irregularities. That’s absurd on its face. As this report shows, there is an abundance of evidence – a virtual cornucopia of potentially poisonous election irregularities.
In light of this evidence, this must also be said: Those American citizens who are now questioning the potential illegality of votes cast in the 2020 election should NOT be subjected by cable news networks, social media platforms, or the print media to the kind of abhorrent behaviors that we are now observing – social and political behaviors that are far more worthy of Communist China authoritarianism than American democracy.
From public shaming to de-platforming, doxing, and public calls to punish and shun all those who have supported the president or worked in his administration, these types of behaviors are not the American way. Rather, this is Orwell, Kafka, and Xi Jinping all rolled up into the death of the First Amendment and the death knell of our democracy.
 Quoting: ac 44769115
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74701362
United States
01/18/2021 10:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SCOTUS Needs to ISSUE a Court Injunction or a TEMPORARY HOLD on the Inauguration Day Ceremonies
SCOTUS is corrupt, they wouldn't even look at the mountain of election fraud evidence.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 44769115
Canada
01/18/2021 10:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SCOTUS Needs to ISSUE a Court Injunction or a TEMPORARY HOLD on the Inauguration Day Ceremonies
SCOTUS is corrupt, they wouldn't even look at the mountain of election fraud evidence.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74701362


So is not just me then. lol

I hear something about Judge Roberts I wont repeat hear.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10390534
United States
01/18/2021 10:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SCOTUS Needs to ISSUE a Court Injunction or a TEMPORARY HOLD on the Inauguration Day Ceremonies
Scotus is compromised
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79671631
France
01/18/2021 10:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SCOTUS Needs to ISSUE a Court Injunction or a TEMPORARY HOLD on the Inauguration Day Ceremonies
What explanation do you have for this? What US Marshalls do?


 Quoting: kelu
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 44769115
Canada
01/18/2021 10:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SCOTUS Needs to ISSUE a Court Injunction or a TEMPORARY HOLD on the Inauguration Day Ceremonies
Download and read the report. It's short and concise. Right to the point. Its a very quick download and easy reading.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 44769115
Canada
01/18/2021 10:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SCOTUS Needs to ISSUE a Court Injunction or a TEMPORARY HOLD on the Inauguration Day Ceremonies
What explanation do you have for this? What US Marshalls do?


 Quoting: kelu

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79671631


Sorry, I don't click on links that ryme with shitter anymore.

Ever since that blocked Potus account I haven't looked at any of their stuff
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 44769115
Canada
01/18/2021 10:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SCOTUS Needs to ISSUE a Court Injunction or a TEMPORARY HOLD on the Inauguration Day Ceremonies
Scotus is compromised
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10390534


SCOTUS is chicompromised
Depluribus Unum

User ID: 77637440
United States
01/18/2021 10:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SCOTUS Needs to ISSUE a Court Injunction or a TEMPORARY HOLD on the Inauguration Day Ceremonies
I light of new information comming out from the Peter Navarro Report which presents a "strong case" for election fraud, SCOTUS is obligated to issue a court injuction or temporary hold on the inauguration process.

They already dropped the ball once. (Corruption?)

If they do it again this could be seen as aiding a abetting a very serious crime.

I've linked to the Navarro Report below...


Here's the link to the Peter Navaro Report again..

[link to img1.wsimg.com (secure)]



Concluding Remarks

Based on this third and final volume of The Navarro Report, and as Figure Eight demonstrates, it should be clear that there are far more questions raised about the potential illegality of the 2020 presidential election than have been answered. Clearly, the case, evidence, and statistical receipts presented in this report provide a strong case that the 2020 election may well have been stolen not just from President Trump but also from the 74 million Americans who went to the ballot box in good faith in support of President Trump.
Figure Eight
In light of this evidence, it is impossible for anyone to claim that President Trump was in any way wrong in stoutly raising the question of election fraud and irregularities in the weeks following the November 3 election and in calling for his supporters to PEACEFULLY protest. Indeed, for the president not to rise to defend the integrity of the ballot box would have been a betrayal of the 74 million Americans who voted for the president thinking they were participating in what may well not have been a free and fair election.
In light of this evidence, it is also irresponsible – in the extreme – for the Democrat Party and its leadership, or journalists in the mainstream media, or RINO Republicans to claim there is no evidence of election irregularities. That’s absurd on its face. As this report shows, there is an abundance of evidence – a virtual cornucopia of potentially poisonous election irregularities.
In light of this evidence, this must also be said: Those American citizens who are now questioning the potential illegality of votes cast in the 2020 election should NOT be subjected by cable news networks, social media platforms, or the print media to the kind of abhorrent behaviors that we are now observing – social and political behaviors that are far more worthy of Communist China authoritarianism than American democracy.
From public shaming to de-platforming, doxing, and public calls to punish and shun all those who have supported the president or worked in his administration, these types of behaviors are not the American way. Rather, this is Orwell, Kafka, and Xi Jinping all rolled up into the death of the First Amendment and the death knell of our democracy.
 Quoting: ac 44769115

 Quoting: Trump 44769115


SCOTUS was obligated before 11/3 to address the unconstitutional changes of election law by state supreme courts, governors, and SoS's. SCOTUS was obligated to address the overwhelming evidence of contempt of law and fraud in the weeks after the election.

SCOTUS does not care about its obligations. Don't count on it in the 11th hour.
From many, covfefe
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 44769115
Canada
01/18/2021 10:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SCOTUS Needs to ISSUE a Court Injunction or a TEMPORARY HOLD on the Inauguration Day Ceremonies
Im not even sure if an injunction is possible but i'm sure there are lots of other avenues they can pursue.
President Elect dodger007

User ID: 77690112
United States
01/18/2021 11:00 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SCOTUS Needs to ISSUE a Court Injunction or a TEMPORARY HOLD on the Inauguration Day Ceremonies
I believe a fundamental statement in the Constitution is that the US must never be without a President. People are wedded to the idea that a power transition must take place at noon on Jan 20. Not sure what would be the basis for changing this.... though early inaugurations took place in March.

All the other cases were dismissed over procedure, not evidence. Ie, “ lack of standing”. Who in a case like this has “ standing”? Yes, we the people but who, in the eyes of this Court, who speaks for us? Thus far they seem to hold the fake vote from rigged elections that was “ certified”...to be our voice.

Last Edited by Dodger007 on 01/18/2021 11:05 AM
You can count on America to do the right thing after exhausting every other alternative."
Winston Churchill
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 37774792
United States
01/18/2021 11:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SCOTUS Needs to ISSUE a Court Injunction or a TEMPORARY HOLD on the Inauguration Day Ceremonies
Who has standing, and in what court?? That is the question!
Jembrana

User ID: 73356985
United States
01/18/2021 11:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SCOTUS Needs to ISSUE a Court Injunction or a TEMPORARY HOLD on the Inauguration Day Ceremonies
I light of new information comming out from the Peter Navarro Report which presents a "strong case" for election fraud, SCOTUS is obligated to issue a court injuction or temporary hold on the inauguration process.

They already dropped the ball once. (Corruption?)

If they do it again this could be seen as aiding a abetting a very serious crime.

I've linked to the Navarro Report below...


Here's the link to the Peter Navaro Report again..

[link to img1.wsimg.com (secure)]



Concluding Remarks

Based on this third and final volume of The Navarro Report, and as Figure Eight demonstrates, it should be clear that there are far more questions raised about the potential illegality of the 2020 presidential election than have been answered. Clearly, the case, evidence, and statistical receipts presented in this report provide a strong case that the 2020 election may well have been stolen not just from President Trump but also from the 74 million Americans who went to the ballot box in good faith in support of President Trump.
Figure Eight
In light of this evidence, it is impossible for anyone to claim that President Trump was in any way wrong in stoutly raising the question of election fraud and irregularities in the weeks following the November 3 election and in calling for his supporters to PEACEFULLY protest. Indeed, for the president not to rise to defend the integrity of the ballot box would have been a betrayal of the 74 million Americans who voted for the president thinking they were participating in what may well not have been a free and fair election.
In light of this evidence, it is also irresponsible – in the extreme – for the Democrat Party and its leadership, or journalists in the mainstream media, or RINO Republicans to claim there is no evidence of election irregularities. That’s absurd on its face. As this report shows, there is an abundance of evidence – a virtual cornucopia of potentially poisonous election irregularities.
In light of this evidence, this must also be said: Those American citizens who are now questioning the potential illegality of votes cast in the 2020 election should NOT be subjected by cable news networks, social media platforms, or the print media to the kind of abhorrent behaviors that we are now observing – social and political behaviors that are far more worthy of Communist China authoritarianism than American democracy.
From public shaming to de-platforming, doxing, and public calls to punish and shun all those who have supported the president or worked in his administration, these types of behaviors are not the American way. Rather, this is Orwell, Kafka, and Xi Jinping all rolled up into the death of the First Amendment and the death knell of our democracy.
 Quoting: ac 44769115

 Quoting: Trump 44769115


Obviously all of SCOTUS has been bought and paid for. They will do absolutely nothing
Suteja Komang
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79576058
United States
01/18/2021 11:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SCOTUS Needs to ISSUE a Court Injunction or a TEMPORARY HOLD on the Inauguration Day Ceremonies
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 49493636
Canada
01/18/2021 01:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SCOTUS Needs to ISSUE a Court Injunction or a TEMPORARY HOLD on the Inauguration Day Ceremonies
bumpbumpbumpbump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 40473733
Canada
01/18/2021 01:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SCOTUS Needs to ISSUE a Court Injunction or a TEMPORARY HOLD on the Inauguration Day Ceremonies
bumpbumpbumpbump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78893046
United States
01/18/2021 01:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SCOTUS Needs to ISSUE a Court Injunction or a TEMPORARY HOLD on the Inauguration Day Ceremonies
Who is Navarro and is his report an official government investigation?

If not, it is as good as nothing.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 72530568
Canada
01/18/2021 01:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SCOTUS Needs to ISSUE a Court Injunction or a TEMPORARY HOLD on the Inauguration Day Ceremonies
SCOTUS works for Soros Inc.

There won't be an injunction. That time has passed.
Sungaze_At_Dawn

User ID: 79835284
Canada
01/18/2021 01:52 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SCOTUS Needs to ISSUE a Court Injunction or a TEMPORARY HOLD on the Inauguration Day Ceremonies
Corrupt courts, no checks and balances in place to protect the nation.
The Devil tries to convince everyone he doesn't exist.
The state tries to convince everyone they cannot resist.
Do not go quietly into the good night. Rage Rage against the dying light!





GLP