SCOTUS Needs to ISSUE a Court Injunction or a TEMPORARY HOLD on the Inauguration Day Ceremonies | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74701362 United States 01/18/2021 10:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 44769115 Canada 01/18/2021 10:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10390534 United States 01/18/2021 10:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79671631 France 01/18/2021 10:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What explanation do you have for this? What US Marshalls do? Quoting: kelu https://twitter.com/_/status/1351167667479175176 |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 44769115 Canada 01/18/2021 10:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 44769115 Canada 01/18/2021 10:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What explanation do you have for this? What US Marshalls do? Quoting: kelu https://twitter.com/_/status/1351167667479175176 Sorry, I don't click on links that ryme with shitter anymore. Ever since that blocked Potus account I haven't looked at any of their stuff |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 44769115 Canada 01/18/2021 10:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Depluribus Unum
User ID: 77637440 United States 01/18/2021 10:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I light of new information comming out from the Peter Navarro Report which presents a "strong case" for election fraud, SCOTUS is obligated to issue a court injuction or temporary hold on the inauguration process. Quoting: Trump 44769115 They already dropped the ball once. (Corruption?) If they do it again this could be seen as aiding a abetting a very serious crime. I've linked to the Navarro Report below... Here's the link to the Peter Navaro Report again.. Quoting: ac 44769115 [link to img1.wsimg.com (secure)] Concluding Remarks Based on this third and final volume of The Navarro Report, and as Figure Eight demonstrates, it should be clear that there are far more questions raised about the potential illegality of the 2020 presidential election than have been answered. Clearly, the case, evidence, and statistical receipts presented in this report provide a strong case that the 2020 election may well have been stolen not just from President Trump but also from the 74 million Americans who went to the ballot box in good faith in support of President Trump. Figure Eight In light of this evidence, it is impossible for anyone to claim that President Trump was in any way wrong in stoutly raising the question of election fraud and irregularities in the weeks following the November 3 election and in calling for his supporters to PEACEFULLY protest. Indeed, for the president not to rise to defend the integrity of the ballot box would have been a betrayal of the 74 million Americans who voted for the president thinking they were participating in what may well not have been a free and fair election. In light of this evidence, it is also irresponsible – in the extreme – for the Democrat Party and its leadership, or journalists in the mainstream media, or RINO Republicans to claim there is no evidence of election irregularities. That’s absurd on its face. As this report shows, there is an abundance of evidence – a virtual cornucopia of potentially poisonous election irregularities. In light of this evidence, this must also be said: Those American citizens who are now questioning the potential illegality of votes cast in the 2020 election should NOT be subjected by cable news networks, social media platforms, or the print media to the kind of abhorrent behaviors that we are now observing – social and political behaviors that are far more worthy of Communist China authoritarianism than American democracy. From public shaming to de-platforming, doxing, and public calls to punish and shun all those who have supported the president or worked in his administration, these types of behaviors are not the American way. Rather, this is Orwell, Kafka, and Xi Jinping all rolled up into the death of the First Amendment and the death knell of our democracy. SCOTUS was obligated before 11/3 to address the unconstitutional changes of election law by state supreme courts, governors, and SoS's. SCOTUS was obligated to address the overwhelming evidence of contempt of law and fraud in the weeks after the election. SCOTUS does not care about its obligations. Don't count on it in the 11th hour. From many, covfefe |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 44769115 Canada 01/18/2021 10:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
President Elect dodger007
User ID: 77690112 United States 01/18/2021 11:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I believe a fundamental statement in the Constitution is that the US must never be without a President. People are wedded to the idea that a power transition must take place at noon on Jan 20. Not sure what would be the basis for changing this.... though early inaugurations took place in March. All the other cases were dismissed over procedure, not evidence. Ie, “ lack of standing”. Who in a case like this has “ standing”? Yes, we the people but who, in the eyes of this Court, who speaks for us? Thus far they seem to hold the fake vote from rigged elections that was “ certified”...to be our voice. Last Edited by Dodger007 on 01/18/2021 11:05 AM You can count on America to do the right thing after exhausting every other alternative." Winston Churchill |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 37774792 United States 01/18/2021 11:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Jembrana
User ID: 73356985 United States 01/18/2021 11:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I light of new information comming out from the Peter Navarro Report which presents a "strong case" for election fraud, SCOTUS is obligated to issue a court injuction or temporary hold on the inauguration process. Quoting: Trump 44769115 They already dropped the ball once. (Corruption?) If they do it again this could be seen as aiding a abetting a very serious crime. I've linked to the Navarro Report below... Here's the link to the Peter Navaro Report again.. Quoting: ac 44769115 [link to img1.wsimg.com (secure)] Concluding Remarks Based on this third and final volume of The Navarro Report, and as Figure Eight demonstrates, it should be clear that there are far more questions raised about the potential illegality of the 2020 presidential election than have been answered. Clearly, the case, evidence, and statistical receipts presented in this report provide a strong case that the 2020 election may well have been stolen not just from President Trump but also from the 74 million Americans who went to the ballot box in good faith in support of President Trump. Figure Eight In light of this evidence, it is impossible for anyone to claim that President Trump was in any way wrong in stoutly raising the question of election fraud and irregularities in the weeks following the November 3 election and in calling for his supporters to PEACEFULLY protest. Indeed, for the president not to rise to defend the integrity of the ballot box would have been a betrayal of the 74 million Americans who voted for the president thinking they were participating in what may well not have been a free and fair election. In light of this evidence, it is also irresponsible – in the extreme – for the Democrat Party and its leadership, or journalists in the mainstream media, or RINO Republicans to claim there is no evidence of election irregularities. That’s absurd on its face. As this report shows, there is an abundance of evidence – a virtual cornucopia of potentially poisonous election irregularities. In light of this evidence, this must also be said: Those American citizens who are now questioning the potential illegality of votes cast in the 2020 election should NOT be subjected by cable news networks, social media platforms, or the print media to the kind of abhorrent behaviors that we are now observing – social and political behaviors that are far more worthy of Communist China authoritarianism than American democracy. From public shaming to de-platforming, doxing, and public calls to punish and shun all those who have supported the president or worked in his administration, these types of behaviors are not the American way. Rather, this is Orwell, Kafka, and Xi Jinping all rolled up into the death of the First Amendment and the death knell of our democracy. Obviously all of SCOTUS has been bought and paid for. They will do absolutely nothing Suteja Komang |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79576058 United States 01/18/2021 11:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 49493636 Canada 01/18/2021 01:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 40473733 Canada 01/18/2021 01:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78893046 United States 01/18/2021 01:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72530568 Canada 01/18/2021 01:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Sungaze_At_Dawn
User ID: 79835284 Canada 01/18/2021 01:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Corrupt courts, no checks and balances in place to protect the nation. The Devil tries to convince everyone he doesn't exist. The state tries to convince everyone they cannot resist. Do not go quietly into the good night. Rage Rage against the dying light! |