BREAKING INTEL - How Discrediting Attacks are Disguised - How To Recognize Them and Why You Want To?

still cant address the fact and issue presented..

instead.. resort to poking fun and making it a joke..

deflect much?

In fact, if you assume the v-pn provider only has 10000 ips available (ridiculously low assumption), the probability of two specific individuals getting the same IP assigned, within weeks of each other, is

1 out of 10,000.

But those same two individuals shared IPs TWICE, so actually the probability is

1 out of 100,000,000.

But wait, expand it to the third individual that shares iPs with these guys, it happened at LEAST 2 more times with those same individuals over the same time span, so actually the probability of THAT happening is:

1 out of 10,000,000,000,000,000

Orrrrr

The posters are the same dude

Which seems more likely?

Did you check your user ID? Multiple users. Busted

Define trolling, or Larping, and then read through this thread.

Everyone is just asking OP to explain what is a growing pile of evidence that OP is using proxies to play some kind of game, often posting on both sides of the same issue.

For 2 days now, yet he refuses to address it.

Why?

Because it’s true.

Now trying to be the martyr.

How Discrediting Attacks Are Disguised
A basic primer on how the enemy operates, their tactics and their true motives to suppress the truth, everywhere.

Given everything that has been said so far, it is obvious that discrediting attacks, whatever their motive, generally take place under heavy disguise. First, the attacker must portray his attack as an attempt to support the order of values of society by exposing a violator who deserves to be exposed, in essence enhancing his own image as he assaults another's. If this were all there were to these disguise, we might have an easier time discerning the role of discredit, domination, assertiveness and sadism in public life. But the disguise of motives is often supplemented by a far more insidious deception, one that masks the fact that an attack is taking place at all or that the journalist or attacker is the one making the attack. Journalists and other communicators often portray themselves as merely asking questions, reporting what others say or describing events, when everyone knows a verbal mugging is actually taking place that may leave the designated victim stripped of the self-defense provided by an effective image.

Fortunately, these disguises tend to be very transparent once one begins to identify the various games and strategies that are being used. Once that has been achieved, we can begin to expose these disguised attempts to expose others; we can discredit these disguised attempts to discredit; and hold these attempts to embarrass others up to embarrassing scrutiny. If all this sounds familiar, it is because what we will be doing is applying a more sophisticated version of the techniques used by journalists, themselves, turning the tables on the great table-turners and holding them up to a kind of scrutiny that reveals the degree to which our media and public culture are steeped in both dishonesty and cruelty.

Like the journalists, our basic technique will be to contrast image, as it is presented, with an underlying reality or, at least, with what we claim is an underlying reality. We will look at what journalists claim they are doing and what they are really doing, and see that the twain meet a lot less often than one might think. Given the complex motives all people have when they communicate, there is no doubt but that the disguises we will examine, here, are merely an example of the disguises that all of us use when we communicate. For all of us, there is a disparity between the actions we engage in and those we claim we are engaging in. That doesn’t let journalists off the hook, but it does put what they do in a larger context.

Here, than, is an incomplete compendium of some of the ways journalists, and others, go about dominating and harming those they encounter, while they claim to be upholding the value order of society and just doing their jobs. Also included are some of the justifications that journalists tell themselves and have ready to offer others, to explain why what they are doing is right and proper. The techniques listed aren’t exhaustive or mutually exclusive and some can be considered variations on each other:

CONTRAST IMAGE AND REALITY. As alluded to earlier, this is a basic method for discrediting someone or something, which is part of all the other techniques described. In it, the journalist shows the claims that are being made and contrasts them with other information, to show that those claims are false. The justification is often that the journalist is just reporting – just getting at the facts or just finding the truth - despite a manipulation intended to conceal the truth.

PORTRAY WRONGDOING AND HIGHLIGHT EMBARRASSING MOMENTS AND FACTS. Simple, elegant, often unchallengeable. Journalists simply show or describe their subjects engaging in actions that are deemed by many to be violations of the value order of society, and then they wait for their subjects to be attacked by others, and to desperately try to explain themselves. They show footage of the bank robbers or describe the offending remarks, and then sit back and enjoy the reaction (and begin working on the follow-up story).

... more at article
Full Article
[link to www.transparencynow.com (secure)]


Examples of Basic Discrediting Attacks (Self Guided Tutorial)

Thread: BREAKING STREET INTEL - Rome Priest Explains Masonic Takeover Agenda. 'We are living in a very dark age and people need to hear the truth.'

Thread: BREAKING REVELATION - I now understand the meaning of code 11-3 and its not military, its in the Bible.

Thread: BREAKING INTEL – America is coming back. It will be ugly and it will be glorious. A bedtime story.

Define trolling, or Larping, and then read through this thread.

Everyone is just asking OP to explain what is a growing pile of evidence that OP is using proxies to play some kind of game, often posting on both sides of the same issue.

For 2 days now, yet he refuses to address it.

Why?

Because it’s true.