BREAKING - Space x rocket just blew up. | |
Buck Fiden
User ID: 78975947 United States 02/02/2021 06:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What the hell are they even trying to achieve here ? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79314424 So this is a f*cking reusable part of a future launch vehicle? REALLY.....? REALLY....? THINK PEOPLE.....REALLY THINK. This thing went up to 10 km and was then at ZERO SPEED. Then it fell back to earth from 10 km high and turned around and fired thrusters to land. So what if they do this 400 more times and it gets a 99% success rating. Launches into space have to get the payload up to Mach 25 just to go into orbit and stay there. Even if this is only one "Stage" of the rocket....it will be asked to get velocities of Mach 8 ? Mach 15 ? How is this thing going to then come back safely from 10 km going Mach 8 or mach 15 ? Will this thing even have enough fuel to help a payload get up to mach 8 or mach 15 and then come back and burn enough to slow it down ? This is pure and udder horse Pucky. What are they really doing except grooming more millennials into this mars hoax for the next 10 years. It isn't even logistical engineering. A complete waste of time and money and it's nothing but brain washing. Much like "Green Energy / Paris Climate" CO2 global warming crap. Wow, you’re obviously super smart. You must’ve designed and launched tons of rockets. Please post a link so we can see all of your rocket launches. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35949570 United States 02/02/2021 07:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What the hell are they even trying to achieve here ? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79314424 So this is a f*cking reusable part of a future launch vehicle? REALLY.....? REALLY....? THINK PEOPLE.....REALLY THINK. This thing went up to 10 km and was then at ZERO SPEED. Then it fell back to earth from 10 km high and turned around and fired thrusters to land. So what if they do this 400 more times and it gets a 99% success rating. Launches into space have to get the payload up to Mach 25 just to go into orbit and stay there. Even if this is only one "Stage" of the rocket....it will be asked to get velocities of Mach 8 ? Mach 15 ? How is this thing going to then come back safely from 10 km going Mach 8 or mach 15 ? Will this thing even have enough fuel to help a payload get up to mach 8 or mach 15 and then come back and burn enough to slow it down ? This is pure and udder horse Pucky. What are they really doing except grooming more millennials into this mars hoax for the next 10 years. It isn't even logistical engineering. A complete waste of time and money and it's nothing but brain washing. Much like "Green Energy / Paris Climate" CO2 global warming crap. But, but, but, there is water on the moon (5 Gallon Buckets worth) and we are going there first then on to Mars to build an new Amazon warehouse where we can order stuff to setup on Mars and save on shipping. DUUH! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73865729 United States 02/02/2021 07:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77428388 United States 02/02/2021 07:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What the hell are they even trying to achieve here ? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79314424 So this is a f*cking reusable part of a future launch vehicle? REALLY.....? REALLY....? THINK PEOPLE.....REALLY THINK. This thing went up to 10 km and was then at ZERO SPEED. Then it fell back to earth from 10 km high and turned around and fired thrusters to land. So what if they do this 400 more times and it gets a 99% success rating. Launches into space have to get the payload up to Mach 25 just to go into orbit and stay there. Even if this is only one "Stage" of the rocket....it will be asked to get velocities of Mach 8 ? Mach 15 ? How is this thing going to then come back safely from 10 km going Mach 8 or mach 15 ? Will this thing even have enough fuel to help a payload get up to mach 8 or mach 15 and then come back and burn enough to slow it down ? This is pure and udder horse Pucky. What are they really doing except grooming more millennials into this mars hoax for the next 10 years. It isn't even logistical engineering. A complete waste of time and money and it's nothing but brain washing. Much like "Green Energy / Paris Climate" CO2 global warming crap. You my friend should stick to masturbating. Ever think the landing is the difficult part? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77428388 United States 02/02/2021 07:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72675585 United States 02/02/2021 07:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
ChefElvis
User ID: 13147426 United States 02/02/2021 07:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 79091181 Canada 02/02/2021 07:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79008265 United States 02/02/2021 07:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Cap’n Obvious
User ID: 78963999 United States 02/02/2021 07:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's an R&D platform, serial number 9 (SN9), trying to perfect a few maneuvers, including flipping and landing a fat starship with a last-second suicide burn using a brand-new engine design. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79754262 It's clearly a risky landing procedure, one that will take a lot of research and practice to get right. Crashes are expected while learning how to fly and land that ship. Undoubtedly, this won't be the last one. SN10 may try it next week. Unlike NASA, Elon isn't afraid of risking prototypes when learning how to make and use space ships. They need to re-lite all three engines and pick the best two. Ridiculous to light two and have one not restart. Looks like they are going to need to do some design rework on these engines. Replacing too many on the pad when they can’t get through static testing. Have a nice day = GFY. GFY = Go Fuck Yourself. If this offends you then have a nice day. |
¤ Sizzling Pot ¤
User ID: 78997656 United States 02/02/2021 07:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Cap’n Obvious
User ID: 78963999 United States 02/02/2021 08:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's a dog and pony show to make people think we're making progress while they hide all the real cool tech. We do not have access to the alien tech required to take the volume/weight into space and get back safely that starship is designed to do. Small stuff/people - yes We can use alien tech to get large volume/loads around the globe - but are limited in altitude. For now. Have a nice day = GFY. GFY = Go Fuck Yourself. If this offends you then have a nice day. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78479066 United States 02/02/2021 08:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's a dog and pony show to make people think we're making progress while they hide all the real cool tech. We do not have access to the alien tech required to take the volume/weight into space and get back safely that starship is designed to do. Small stuff/people - yes We can use alien tech to get large volume/loads around the globe - but are limited in altitude. For now. But what about the flying submarines and solar warden? Lol actually what you're saying makes sense. This technology probably messes with inertia to accomplish what it does, meaning higher mass will make it more difficult. But apparently there are different technologies to achieve anti-gravity effects. Perhaps you just don't know about the other ones :) |
Cap’n Obvious
User ID: 78963999 United States 02/06/2021 12:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's an R&D platform, serial number 9 (SN9), trying to perfect a few maneuvers, including flipping and landing a fat starship with a last-second suicide burn using a brand-new engine design. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79754262 It's clearly a risky landing procedure, one that will take a lot of research and practice to get right. Crashes are expected while learning how to fly and land that ship. Undoubtedly, this won't be the last one. SN10 may try it next week. Unlike NASA, Elon isn't afraid of risking prototypes when learning how to make and use space ships. They need to re-lite all three engines and pick the best two. Ridiculous to light two and have one not restart. Looks like they are going to need to do some design rework on these engines. Replacing too many on the pad when they can’t get through static testing. I should not brag and say I told you so... but Elon tweeted that the solution was to reignite all three engines... Have a nice day = GFY. GFY = Go Fuck Yourself. If this offends you then have a nice day. |
><even
User ID: 79827759 United States 02/06/2021 12:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Either another repost or Elon is having a forth of July month. I reserve the right to declare my comments and posts as satire. Nothing I post should be considered or interpreted as advocacy for illegal activity. My comments are designed to inspire critical political thinking. I only mean half of what I say and only say half of what I mean. |