Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,110 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 754,046
Pageviews Today: 1,329,922Threads Today: 562Posts Today: 9,713
03:33 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject EsoteriQue
Poster Handle Saint Lance the Odd from BC
Post Content
I decided to go and check on the DNA studies these so-called DNA experts say they are for some reason, they missed part of how different species can not give mix unless their offspring are different from others, those offsprings can not have offsprings, they are sterile. This is why they have mislabeled two groups of past MANKIND, don't call them a separate hominid, no matter they looked somewhat different which can be from adaptations of where they lived. If they mated with other groups and had offsprings then they were part of mankind, all that happened their DNA lowered to what you have today, this happens even today.

I don't know if they are doing this deliberately or not. All I know is they are not weeding out the idea someone put in their heads. Ratio Carbon dating does not work for a good reason, it doesn't give the climate changes over vast areas of time in areas, you can go from a fertile plan into deserts, within fifty years, carbon decays faster under some climates. If there are fish in an area that can come into contact is gives bad reading of carbon decays. It is not any good over a set time of dating in the first place. They should also rethink generations, you can have more generation in a short amount of time, as it has been for the last two thousand years. We had a large die off about 1800 years ago, all over the world, the evidence is everywhere.

Now about a die off, recently I found another piece of dragon information of all place under the pyramid of the Sun in Mexico, it is the so call god of the snake in these cultures, the picture of it on the walls there in the underground was that same dragon, dinosaur, with some head redone as the one on a temple in one of the Asia areas, I believe it's an island area, maybe wrong, no one lives there. The dinosaur is one with these fen like growths growing all the way from its high neck to the end of its tail. This picture is the same with some designs on it. They didn't invent the idea or picture they copied if from the Omec people, their mask that depicted it was more like the dinosaurs had without the extra designs. So, this is about the fourth ancient yet not more than 2000 years ago, everyone I have seen drawn or craved is no more than 2000 or less some no more than 1800 years ago. I have seen a drawing of a woman from those times with a little one on a leach, walking it as we do dogs. Paintings on walls, there is more than people know, in areas not far from Italy or on the border area of Italy, Middle East, and Asia and South America, Central America. So, what is a very supposed long dead Dinosaur doing on more recent craving and paintings about those dinosaurs and exactly as scientist claim they look like?

They had dragons in the Middle East and Egypt until they died out, they are painted on the walls in those more ancient Cities, those are real dinosaurs, the twisted neck ones should be known by most who know anything about dinosaurs, they were similar to Giraffes their necks allowed them to eat high forage. Colossus by name in the Bible, these animals mostly would be tamable as any large animal which wasn't a meat eater. Want a crane to lift things? Have they dug for those dinosaurs over there? Or somewhere you could import them?

Just saying history is not written totally correctly because they are not doing stopping to check for more recent knowledge of some of these animal or want ever they were. If man became hungry at anytime over those years, I know what happen to these animals, fine meals. I don't think there was ever that many dinosaurs after the flood, enough only they didn't have large numbers. 1600 and 1700s maybe early shows people attacking these beasts in Europe and some large snake like thing. When they sailed these type creatures were reported and watched drawn and measured as close as they could with comparisons. I have come to believe there were two types of dinosaurs from what evidence I have found, one Reptile the other would be classified as mammal. One would be similar to snakes, lizards, fish and bird types maybe with feathers, the other mammals with hides like elephants and short hair, similar to horse or something similar not exactly. The hummingbird itself, was just a huge hummingbird like today, we have animals and reptiles dying out even today.

I am adding puzzle pieces as they show up. Africa has gapes in the DNA over and their modern DNA isn't the ancient kind, so they have a problem with backing off out of Africa. I think it funny, they jump through hoop ever so many years lately. They should have never said, this is how it was.

Half the time they do sloppy DNA work because of how they handle it.
 Quoting: hankie


Yes there is an issue with dating things. Ice core samples don't make any sense at all!
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP