Sen Rick Scott (R-Fla) acknowledges that Joe Biden 'absolutely' won a constitutional and fair election

They allowed NO audits so how does he know?

He doesnt.

Trump won!

410 Electoral votes to 128!!

Wut? Nobody here is calling him a RINO commie traitor owned by CCP and paid for by Soros?

I don't give a fuck what he says I saw the voting going backwards on CNN for Trump. For Biden always advancing. They Lie and cheat all the time what makes this election any different.

But there were vote audits in every battleground state and more than 60 lawsuits before 80+ different judges, some of whom were Trump appointees. None of those showed any significant voter or election fraud.

BUT ALL THEM KRAKENS AND THE MY PILLOWS GUY

And THAT is why im never voting again.

Except that evidence was never allowed to be shown because of bought off judges. A minor detail you forgot.

Add him to the RINO list. Vote him out.

Nuh.

Another play for pay and fuck the people of the USA and Fuck the USA and Fuck the constitution, safe harbor for fat bank accounts.

These traitors will seal their fate.

GM

Add another lying politician to the list.

They give fuck all to the truth.

I bet Rick Scott sees visions of sugar plumbs dancing in his head as well.

Here's another reason the former President lost: MATH.

He lost the House. That’s 1. He lost the Senate. That’s 2. He lost the White House. That’s 3.

Also, 2+2=4; the earth is not flat; there were not more votes than voters; and Hugo Chavez did not steal the election.

Excellent contribution to the thread. What an intelligent, eloquent and highly convincing rebuttal.

Maybe you should just stick with 'duh'.

Sooner or later, I knew the dimwitted, dumbshit cultists like this one would show up with that tired old explainer.

True sign of a compromised bag of rancid cock snot.

Scott = OUT!!!!!!!!

Ok?

None of the judges actually looked at the evidence.

The corrupt judges were exposed.

Yea trump appointed them, then they turned on him.

Do you actually believe that with close to 70 failed lawsuits, not a single court allowed the Trump plaintiffs to present any evidence?

That is simply false. Evidence was presented in many cases, but it was rejected by judges because it was not factual or substantiated. In many cases, that so-called evidence was just unsupported opinion.

Thread: Federal Judge Tosses Arizona Election Challenge: ‘Sorely Wanting of Relevant or Reliable Evidence’

Thread: BREAKING: Nevada court DISMISSES with prejudice Trump Election Contest. "No credible and relevant evidence to substantiate any of the grounds

Thread: BREAKING: Another loss - Federal judge rejects Trump campaign lawsuit in Wisconsin. "Fail as a matter of law & fact"

Thread: Wis Judge Trashes Trump Election Lawsuit: "No Evidence of Misconduct or Wide Scale Fraud"

Thread: Today: Nevada's Republican Secretary of State says "we have yet to see any evidence of wide-spread fraud" in the 2020 election."

For a few examples right here on GLP.

See above. That is just ridiculous. Out of all those lawsuits and around 90 judges, including Trump appointees, you actually believe that all of them refused to look at evidence or allowed it to be introduced into court? And still more judges rejected the same lawsuits on appeal?

Time for that Reichstag fire?

Federal judge Stephanos Bibas pulled no punches when he issued a scathing opinion last Saturday rejecting the Trump campaign’s latest attempt to overturn the outcome of the November 3 presidential election.

“Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so,” Bibas wrote in a 21-page ruling dismissing a lawsuit that sought to stop the certification of Pennsylvania's voting results.

“Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

On June 19, 2017, Donald J Trump nominated Bibas to serve as a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. On November 2, 2017, his nomination was confirmed by the United States Senate by a vote of 53–43.


[link to www.voanews.com (secure)]

LOL

https://twitter.com/_/status/1366159712509648896

He's owned. He probably let's Biden molest his kids like the rest of them do.

Not a single suit proceeded to discovery. They were ALL thrown out before evidence was presented.

And yet the media has you babbling incoherently about “lawsuits”.

You have no idea what you are talking about. Must be a Dem.

It was unconstitutional the moment they stopped counting. We saw with our own eyes that night, vote dumps when supposedly no one was counting, over 100000 votes all for Biden added at 4 in the morning.

We saw on video some cheating cunt named Ruby and her skank daughter shoo observers out with a fake excuse and then pull out secret ballots and run them multiple times on the counting machines because they knew exactly how many Biden votes they needed.

Anyone who says Biden won is either ignorant or paid off or threatened/blackmailed.

USA Gov is illegitimate. Biden is illegitimate. USA is illegitimate nation State.

All elections ever that used electonic voting machines around the world are invalid & illegitiate

Trump is the legal, DULY ELECTED, legitimate POTUS & COMANDER IN CHIEF

FACTS

skullhead is a lackey
always has been.

No, Biden didn't. This just proves Rick Scott is corrupt or incompetent.

Minimal audits of counties that didn't matter, and even then, audits flipped some of them counties to Trump. The election suits were thrown out for having no standing, then thrown out after the election for being moot. But we all know you evil tards are only interested in winning and taking, never the truth and helping.