Is the "emergency only" authorization for the experimental mRNA vax void when there are no excess yearly deaths. No emergency. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3425388 United States 02/28/2021 10:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3425388 United States 02/28/2021 10:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 35913160 United States 03/01/2021 12:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79968592 United States 03/01/2021 01:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is the "emergency only" authorization for the experimental mRNA vax void when there are no excess yearly deaths. No emergency. Just wondering from a legal definition of the word emergency. No pandemic. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35913160 The WHO greatly reduced the requirements of what the guidelines are for declaring a pandemic. Once the WHO does, our CDC is going to be influenced and it is our HHS that makes the declaration for the U.S. As long as that and the PREP Act are in place, this can go on indefinitely until it is proclaimed cancelled. While in effect, the FDA can issue the EUA. However, the FDA has not acted correctly in good faith because there are demonstrated therapeutics that can work. The rub here is that the FDA doesn't fully approve the therapeutics for specifically COVID, they won't, and if they don't do the investigation and research into doing so, it won't happen, so technically, the therapeutics aren't "officially" recognized by the FDA. If this were any other business, it would be called racketeering. Since so many "rules' and protocols are being side stepped, under normal circumstances, no EUA of a novel vaccine (actually medical instrument / gene therapy) would need to have the animal studies completed and longer term safety studies completed before they become fully licensed. Once that happens, ACIP will be pressured, and it will probably be added into the vaccine schedule, where it will also be protected from liability, and more than likely will end up be a recommended annual shot, similar to the flu. Follow the money. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80082437 United Kingdom 03/01/2021 03:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is the "emergency only" authorization for the experimental mRNA vax void when there are no excess yearly deaths. No emergency. All of this is being implemented under emergency powers acts. Most states constitutions have their definitions of emergency along the lines of an imminent threat to life or property along with state agencies unable to cope. Clearly neither of two things exist in the covid psyop yet they rampage on ushering in their other pseudo science such as gene tech shots and pcr tests used as diagnostic tools. Hitler for example used a state of emergency to implement his biosecurity state. So have most others in history. The people were first made to fear death by viruses and through that manufactured fear they willingly accepted appeals to their *peace and security* (*for your protection*) and so usher in these very measures. When the crowd has no idea that 1) they were mentally swayed (deceived) through fear of death to 2) demand and accept the very measures the leaders had ready to be ushered in...well there is no way out until such time as that crowd realises their involvement and wrong choice, realises they chose Barabbas ...and then turn and repent . |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3425388 United States 03/01/2021 04:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is the "emergency only" authorization for the experimental mRNA vax void when there are no excess yearly deaths. No emergency. All of this is being implemented under emergency powers acts. Most states constitutions have their definitions of emergency along the lines of an imminent threat to life or property along with state agencies unable to cope. Clearly neither of two things exist in the covid psyop yet they rampage on ushering in their other pseudo science such as gene tech shots and pcr tests used as diagnostic tools. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80082437 Hitler for example used a state of emergency to implement his biosecurity state. So have most others in history. The people were first made to fear death by viruses and through that manufactured fear they willingly accepted appeals to their *peace and security* (*for your protection*) and so usher in these very measures. When the crowd has no idea that 1) they were mentally swayed (deceived) through fear of death to 2) demand and accept the very measures the leaders had ready to be ushered in...well there is no way out until such time as that crowd realises their involvement and wrong choice, realises they chose Barabbas ...and then turn and repent . the potential future is not looking great, to say the least. a lot of torque built up, that needs somewhere to go. |
Matrix User ID: 80082823 Australia 03/01/2021 04:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is the "emergency only" authorization for the experimental mRNA vax void when there are no excess yearly deaths. No emergency. The deaths in 2020 was not higher then previous years, yet they manage to declare a emergency, when there clearly was not one based only on the projected skyrocketing death models that never came true. Fake news and fake emergencies to scare people into giving up their rights is all the rage, yet they will not fight for their rights, so deserve to have them stripped away under false emergency that never generated the death rate necessary to trigger it all....:vlwc: |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 35913160 United States 03/01/2021 09:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79629482 United States 03/01/2021 09:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is the "emergency only" authorization for the experimental mRNA vax void when there are no excess yearly deaths. No emergency. Just wondering from a legal definition of the word emergency. No pandemic. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35913160 The WHO greatly reduced the requirements of what the guidelines are for declaring a pandemic. Once the WHO does, our CDC is going to be influenced and it is our HHS that makes the declaration for the U.S. As long as that and the PREP Act are in place, this can go on indefinitely until it is proclaimed cancelled. While in effect, the FDA can issue the EUA. However, the FDA has not acted correctly in good faith because there are demonstrated therapeutics that can work. The rub here is that the FDA doesn't fully approve the therapeutics for specifically COVID, they won't, and if they don't do the investigation and research into doing so, it won't happen, so technically, the therapeutics aren't "officially" recognized by the FDA. If this were any other business, it would be called racketeering. Since so many "rules' and protocols are being side stepped, under normal circumstances, no EUA of a novel vaccine (actually medical instrument / gene therapy) would need to have the animal studies completed and longer term safety studies completed before they become fully licensed. Once that happens, ACIP will be pressured, and it will probably be added into the vaccine schedule, where it will also be protected from liability, and more than likely will end up be a recommended annual shot, similar to the flu. Follow the money. The freaking "COVID VAX" is not "fully approved" either! The hell. |