As it stands,IMO, our judicial system has deemed the evidence as fake, fraudulent, inclusive or something, where is the proof of that? There must be evidence refuting witness testimony.

I'm not trying to rehash the entirety of it all, I want a valid rebuttal of the facts presented by the witnesses and a prosecution if applicable. Where are federal prosecutors on this?

I have to leave now but I hope someone will pick this up and provide some insight.