Liberal vs Conservative Definitions Upside Down and Backwards Inside Out and Reversed side Up

When I was a kid, I was taught that democrats were good and republicans were bad.

Democrats believed in free will, also called liberalism.
Republicans either happened to be Christian and therefore pushed their religion into their politics or happened to be rich and pushed their classism into their politics.

When I joined the military, I was exposed to a new demographic. People there were encouraged openly to be a republican because Reagan raised the wages for military greatly during the 80's. I thought it was selfish to vote for the enemy for a couple of bucks -- that would be selling out ideals for money -- power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

In the 90's, it was the first time the democrats had been in power since I was too young to understand who was the president. When Carter had been in office, I was so young, I thought the president was Lincoln since he was on the penny. So, I didn't even think we could get a democrat in office.

They had every last democrat running. Paul Tsongas was my favorite. It was going to be the first time I was allowed to vote and that guy seemed okay to me.

At that time, Bill Clinton had the most experience, with 12 years as a governor and so he became the front runner. He didn't look like the other democrats. He looked a lot more like a republican. He had a big old head and looked like he was a used car salesman, people said. He was probably my least favorite candidate and he came out with the nomination. His running mate looked more like a typical democrat and talked about environment and computers, sort of progressive sounding. People said he was a little stiff though. I didn't see it at the time. However, I figured maybe he would be President some day and that we could handle this bill guy in order to get that Al guy.

Half way through the Bill guy, it was all over the news that there was some scandal with an intern. I guess liberalism got too liberal in the bedroom and the reputation of the democrats started to slide downhill with that.

Then Bush Jr. comes in and steals the election in Florida. Seemed like a total fraud. 9/11, war, total fascism starts coming in.

2004 and Kerry runs. Turns out, this guy went to the same secret society as Bush Jr. So at that point, it was clear the two parties were both owned by the same people and it was all orchestrated up above using secret societies. I didn't bother to vote in 2004 or ever again because once I saw that, there was no point.

In 2008, they brought out McCain who said he wanted to be in Iraq for 100 years if it took that long. This guy seemed nuts. Obama said he wanted transparency in government. Wow. Could it be real?

Before then, I already started learning about 9/11 being an inside job. And after Obama was in office, he started making illegal health care that forces people to sign up. I didn't agree with that. I thought McCain was corrupt, Palin was an idiot, Obama was turning out to be some kind of Manchurian candidate concocted in a lab and Biden was some kind of old white guy stuck on the ticket to make it look a little more like the old days so people could deal with the change of sticking a Mulato guy in office.

Then, I found out about fluoride, chemtrails, vaccines, all the false flags, GMOs, MK Ultra, the bilderbergs, saw that Zeitgeist movie -- the banking cartel, etc.

By the time Trump ran, I figured that the powers that be knew a lot of us had figured out the old game and they came up with Trump as a way to trick those of us waking up into believing this guy was for real.

4 years later and that is sort of what it looks like.

Now, democrats aren't liberal. They are pseudo-science nazis who watch CNN, are brainwashed by the school system into thinking they have an education and are smarter than the rest of the population and really, their education was a mish mash of programming, learning not to critically think but memorize and cram while underslept and sleep deprived and the resulting degreed individual has a well paid job in the private sector feeling smug and pushing paper around while having the IQ of a billy goat and the ego of a guy who lies and says he made it through the Navy Seals and it turns out he didn't get accepted into the military because his eyesight was too bad and he had flat feet but he has a vivid imagination and plays Magic the Gathering with his buddies because he can't find a girlfriend because he doesn't know how to dance or fuck.

So, what is "liberal" about a democrat?

And what is "conservative" about a republican?

And why is a conspiracy theorist "ultra right wing"?

Wouldn't a conspiracy theorist be open minded for believing that we can use our energy to raise our vibration and awaken the masses to the lies they have been fed...isn't that the definition of a hippy...like totally left wing greeny trying to save the planet?

I'm so sick of the backwards labelling system being crammed down our throats.

These fuckers who create these paradigms for the masses are changing the fucking narrative constantly to fit whatever agenda they want to push down people's throats.

We need a new party that makes sense and it isn't the Trump party and it isn't republican or conservative or liberal or green.

They take any word that is positive and spin it until it has a negative connotation.

Sovereign citizens describes every US citizen. It means that each citizen of the US is just as much of a sovereign as the Queen of the United Kingdom and we are subjects of nobody else but our own self.

So, they teach cops that if you say you are a sovereign citizen, that means you are a fringe nutjob making up your own license plate and fake driver's license.

Whoah. Talk about framing the narrative.

Truther -- sounds like bad grammar intended to make us look stupid.

Conspiracy theorist -- makes it sound like these are theories and not based on facts. Also, the conspiracy committers are the enemy, so stick the conspiracy negative connotation on them, not the truther who outs them.

Anti- vaxxer --- anytime they put anti in front of something, the masses thinks anti-christ in the back of their minds and that's (a)loony and (b) not nice cause Jesus was the nice guy -- another emotional framing of the narrative by bad word association.

We need to label the enemy and what they do and stop using words that sound positive.

Illuminati sounds like they are teaching the buddha to become enlightened.

Elite sounds like they went through special ops school and didn't tap out.

The banking cartel sounds like white collar drug lords who drink tea instead of snorting coke and use a ball point pen instead of an oozie to handle business affairs.

4th dimensional reptilians makes it sound like alligator/human hybrids with a prediliction for possessing the bodies of the extremely rich and powerful

They are the dominant predator on the planet.

And we are the second most dominant predator on the planet and also we are their prey as they enslave us into their monetary and control system.

They are Ricky Bobby and we are Cal Naughton Junior.

We want to be running the show, but we are playing slave in a non stop game of if you're not first you're last.

We want to be on top, but we don't know how. We don't take down the predator for one reason and one reason only.

It isn't that we can't ban together and make up our minds to fucking kill these assholes once and for all.

It is because to end their lives means we have to take responsibility for the human race and that means figuring out how to direct 8 billion people towards a common goal that up until now means there are a few haves and a whole lot of have nots. If you continue that system, you are by default doing exactly what the current slave masters are doing. And if you change the system, then you have to adequately feed, house, employ and educate 8 billion people; and if you do that, they are going to live longer, make more babies, explode in population size and eat everything like China does; dogs, bugs, snakes...

So, we are passively waiting for the current slave masters to reduce the population and create a world where nobody eats dogs...or at least, nobody new does...good luck stopping that kind of shit in China. That's 1.5 billion Chinese people...try telling them all what they can and can't do and see how far you get.

The problem on this planet is slavery 2nd. The problem on this planet is 8 billion people, most of whom aren't spiritually advanced enough not to dominate, control, enslave at some level or abuse the other inhabitants of the planet.

Child abuse is rampant. People are not too bright; look at all the mask tards, for example. That is not too smart to put something over your breathing hole. No other species is stupid enough to do that. You won't catch a dolphin covering their spout and you won't see a monkey doing it either. Not a dog or even a fish would do something that stupid.

You can love the potential of human beings; the spirit of good within souls who strive to do good.

When it comes down to it though, a lot of humans do a lot of damage. And, yeah, the super rich certainly aren't exempt from that fact. In addition to the population going down amongst the idiots of the world wearing masks and getting shots, the super rich probably could die off and the world would be a better place if they did.

However, they have a function.

Like the great white shark cleans up all the trash in the ocean by eating it, so the super rich eat up and trim down the fat of the population. They manage it.

They are evil and they also create a kind of balancing act of destruction versus the extreme population explosion from having more babies than anyone can adequately care for and raise with reasonable levels of support.

I am not advocating for them.

I still hope there is a better way.

The truth is that if we knew a better way, we would remove the super rich and institute this better way.

Who thinks they know how to run this world in a better way?