Hi again ... I hope I am not going too quickly. Part of my belief in The Pyramids representing the planets is simply the fact that the diagonal of The Great Pyramid in cubits (622.254 of them) when divided by 8 gives us 77.781746 . Now so what you might ask ... well as I was exploring numerous calculations I chanced to divide the semi major axis of Neptune which was according to Wiki ... well now this is interesting . It appears that Wiki does not want anyone to try to figure anything else as this is what it posts for Neptune:

[link to imagizer.imageshack.com (secure)]

While I long ago had discovered that "Simple Wiki" yielded this result

[link to imagizer.imageshack.com (secure)]

So the semi major distance to Neptune is 4,503,443,661 km while to Mercury it is 57,909,050 so how many times would Mercury's distance divide into Neptune's distance and we get ... 4,503,443,661 / 57,909,050 = 77.767527891

So what does this give us ? Well

As most of you know I have spent decades searching . I would like to think that along the way I have accumulated a bit of wisdom and knowledge and that many of you have enjoyed the journey . One of the major things I found was an apparent correlation between The Pyramids of Giza and Our Solar System . For many years I took this as meaning that Giza was an astronomical book in stone and that The Ancient Builders built the pyramids to mimic the sky . As my knowledge increased it became apparent that many of the planetary ratios in The Heavens were duplicated at Giza and now with my discoveries at Meidum I am more convinced than ever that The Pyramids are messages in stone and to read them all you need is the language of Mathematics .

This thread is going to catch you up on where my head is at and what "final" conclusion I have reached . To fully appreciate my thoughts a belief in an architect of The Universe is almost mandatory for if it is chaos you believe in, what's the point of it all and why build The Pyramids with all that clever mathematical ratios.

Another search has always been, why are the planets where they are ? What apparent yet undiscovered (until now) plan was at work. So did "God" just roll the dice, Albert Einstein doesn't think so, or did he use The Kiss Principle when he designed and created The Universe and especially Our Solar System. Please remember I am creating a template at the moment of creation. The planets have shifted and reacted to each other and so where the planets are now may not be, and probably aren't, where they were "in the beginning" Some may claim special pleading but it is a fact.

I am going to show that The Architect of Creation used the simplest of building blocks and it is because of this we find it at Giza but after the evidence I present you may actually become a believer

Hi all . Some background links:

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

I am not inclined to rehash this so I will just post it as I wrote it and add a few things at the end.

[link to imagizer.imageshack.com (secure)]

[link to imagizer.imageshack.com (secure)]

(PRESENT NOTE: I have long asked myself and anyone else I could think of a fairly straight forward and simple question ... "Why are the planets where they are and why are they the size that they are ?" I have never ever got an answer.

This then is my solution. It can't be sent to anyone because academia decided that they would no longer even look at any ideas of the planetary spacing. So I leave it up to you )

[link to imagizer.imageshack.com (secure)]

[link to imagizer.imageshack.com (secure)]

[link to imagizer.imageshack.com (secure)]

[link to imagizer.imageshack.com (secure)]

[link to imagizer.imageshack.com (secure)]

[link to imagizer.imageshack.com (secure)]

[link to imagizer.imageshack.com (secure)]

[link to imagizer.imageshack.com (secure)]

[link to imagizer.imageshack.com (secure)]

The red numbers on this last page derived from the sq rt of 3 and the blue ones derived from the the sq rt of 2 and Ceres equaling them both and the boundary between the "Upper" and "Lower"

sq rt of 3 = Lower or Below

sq rt of 2 = Upper or Above

The Creator being clever used TWO templates . One for the Upper and another for The Lower and that's why no one has found it until now

And then I did some work on seeing if the diameter of The Sun had any bearing on the orbital distances and found that the difference between Pluto and Neptune is 1000 times the diameter of The Sun

Here are my notes for that session.

[link to imagizer.imageshack.com (secure)]

[link to imagizer.imageshack.com (secure)]

[link to imagizer.imageshack.com (secure)]

[link to imagizer.imageshack.com (secure)]

Not a stretch to round off .

Neptune = 3236
Uranus = 2060
Saturn = 1030
Jupiter = 559
Ceres = 298 ( I have seen 297.46 somewhere else)

(PRESENT NOTE: These number may hold some ultimate proofs which I need to study)

And so I went in search of Pluto at Giza today ... (Jun 10, 2020 at 1:30pm)

[link to imagizer.imageshack.com (secure)]

[link to imagizer.imageshack.com (secure)]

[link to imagizer.imageshack.com (secure)]

[link to imagizer.imageshack.com (secure)]

[link to imagizer.imageshack.com (secure)]

[link to imagizer.imageshack.com (secure)]


This looks easy but it has taken me almost 20 years to finally figure out that Our Solar system is being controlled by TWO DIFFERENT RATIOS ! The above is based on the square root of 2 while the below is based on the square root of 3 with Ceres beautifully being the transition line and remarkably made up of the ratios of both the square root of 3 and the square root of 2.

Mercury = square root of 2

Mars = square root of 3

Ceres = square root of 2 + square root of 3

.