| Users Online Now: 1,499 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 53,792 | |
| Pageviews Today: 74,798 | Threads Today: 17 | Posts Today: 353 |
| 12:39 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,499 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 53,792 | |
| Pageviews Today: 74,798 | Threads Today: 17 | Posts Today: 353 |
| 12:39 AM | ||
BREAKING: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas finds social media companies do not have First Amendment right to ban protected speech | |
CHINA VIRUS PEDO JOE
 User ID: 78066189  United States04/05/2021 05:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas finds social media companies do not have First Amendment right to ban protected speech What about their Terms of Service contracts? Quoting: Shingen That is a legal contract one has to agree with in order to post on those sites. The TOS states clearly that these companies reserve the right to edit and delete content, and to terminate service at their discretion. TOS means NOTHING if it violates the US Constitution. Unlike in a South Park episode where Kyle hits "Accept" on his Ipad and then gets turned into a human-Centipad, it's not legal. Courts have over-ruled the "Accept" button as a valid contract anyway. 20 pages of gibberish and you didn't read the part where your wife become property of Twitter so you have to hand her over to Dorsey all because you hit the "Accept" button, NOPE, it's illegal in the US therefore it's an illegal TOS. RELEASE ALL OBAMA BIDEN CLINTON records...Putin is a asshole, just like Biden and Clinton. |
| Loup Garou
User ID: 31702506 United States04/05/2021 05:49 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas finds social media companies do not have First Amendment right to ban protected speech Clarence Thomas is a true Red Blooded American. :Clarence: Just because YOU don’t believe in the Rougarou; or the Loup Garou, don’t make you safe; No ! The Constitution is a blend of 'moral certitude' -- which is one of the reasons that criminals are determined to be rid of it and We the People must be even more determined to defend it. "If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace." - Thomas Paine The only thing the Illuminati fears is an independent person who can live, eat, sleep, stay warm and defend themselves separate from Federal help. Pray that the Lord gives us more time! The End is near and time is short! A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion. ~Proverbs 18:2 For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible "A candle loses nothing by lighting another candle" - James Keller Checkd, Keked, and Rekt! #Kids2 |
| Alien Seb Fiend
User ID: 68742623  Canada04/05/2021 05:51 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas finds social media companies do not have First Amendment right to ban protected speech Forums being one of the first kinds of social media, that doesn't bode well for online freedom in USA, if no forum is allowed to police itself from the wackos posting nonsense. It means that, in terms we can understand around here, chinese libtard shills would be allowed to spam the crap out of GLP.. that's not good. Last Edited by Alien Seb Fiend on 04/05/2021 05:52 PM |
| White Trash
User ID: 76691754 United States04/05/2021 05:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| White Trash
User ID: 76691754 United States04/05/2021 05:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Wilson166
User ID: 77062778 04/05/2021 05:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas finds social media companies do not have First Amendment right to ban protected speech Forums being one of the first kinds of social media, that doesn't bode well for online freedom in USA, if no forum is allowed to police itself from the wackos posting nonsense. It means that, in terms we can understand around here, chinese libtard shills would be allowed to spam the crap out of GLP.. that's not good. Quoting: Alien Seb Fiend Something about you and your green GLP karma doesn't quite pass the non-libtard smell test. However, you may not be a pro-Orwellian, Karen-Gestapo, control-freak liberal, but you also may be all that much of a non-political control freak too, rightwing or non-liberal. Wilson166 |
| Alien Seb Fiend
User ID: 68742623 Canada04/05/2021 05:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas finds social media companies do not have First Amendment right to ban protected speech Forums being one of the first kinds of social media, that doesn't bode well for online freedom in USA, if no forum is allowed to police itself from the wackos posting nonsense. It means that, in terms we can understand around here, chinese libtard shills would be allowed to spam the crap out of GLP.. that's not good. Quoting: Alien Seb Fiend Something about you and your green GLP karma doesn't quite pass the non-libtard smell test. However, you may not be a pro-Orwellian, Karen-Gestapo, control-freak liberal, but you also may be all that much of a non-political control freak too, rightwing or non-liberal. I don't get involved in political threads usually, especially american ones, because it's not my business what you guys do down there, but stuff that threatens GLP makes me go Hmmmmm... I've been a user of old style social media (IRC, forums) since the dawn of the internet, and a bit before, on bbs'. The Man have been tryin' to seize control of the internet since for ever, and slowly we are giving it up to them, piece by piece. Letting the government control the internet is outright commie behavior, really. Anyway USA laws are for USA, so us foreigners don't have to be too concerned, except when our favorite website is under threat from silly politics. Last Edited by Alien Seb Fiend on 04/05/2021 06:06 PM |
| Google_It
(OP) User ID: 80175631 Canada04/05/2021 06:03 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas finds social media companies do not have First Amendment right to ban protected speech Forums being one of the first kinds of social media, that doesn't bode well for online freedom in USA, if no forum is allowed to police itself from the wackos posting nonsense. It means that, in terms we can understand around here, chinese libtard shills would be allowed to spam the crap out of GLP.. that's not good. Quoting: Alien Seb Fiend In a fair and equitable society I would be on that like white on rice. It is never a good idea to let a nanny state take full control of the peoples affairs. Ron Paul was robbed in 2008 Last Edited by Google_It on 04/05/2021 06:03 PM The Voice Of Reason @THEWATCHTOWERS |
| Still
User ID: 79927045 United States04/05/2021 06:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas finds social media companies do not have First Amendment right to ban protected speech Social media companies operate private sites, like this one. Does any actually read and understand what they are agreeing to when they hit the ' I Accept ' button? When your media corporation becomes bigger than Ma Bell ever was, and operates all over the world, and your corporation's platform becomes the dominant way for billions of people to communicate with each other, including in countries where freedom of speech is guaranteed by law, the country club defense is no longer applicable. As these media corporations will soon find out. Spot on! Thank you! |
| SaveUSa
User ID: 58237403 United States04/05/2021 06:32 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas finds social media companies do not have First Amendment right to ban protected speech Social media companies operate private sites, like this one. Quoting: Error 502 Does any actually read and understand what they are agreeing to when they hit the ' I Accept ' button? This is very much a political issue of whose ox is being gored or being gored the hardest. I didn't like owners of small bakeries being bullied by homosexual customers. In turn, I don't like owners of big social-media companies bullying their customers. Moreover, special legal protections have been provided by Congress to parts of Silicon Valley, allowing them to have the rights of both an aggregator and publisher. Then, too, the tricky leftists of Beijing have been muscling Silicon Valley, which has caused them to start muscling America, particularly pro-MAGA, anti-Communist people in the US. All of this wouldn't be such a swamp or sewer if people at the levers of power in America weren't increasingly greedy, dishonest and unethical, all topped off by a "go to hell, America!" attitude. Or leftism run amok. Those with eyes to see. Well said. And unfortunately, no different anywhere else in the world anymore. Within the surreal depths of "reality" lies the truth. |
| Still
User ID: 79927045 United States04/05/2021 06:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| SoaringHawk
User ID: 77854782 United States04/05/2021 06:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas finds social media companies do not have First Amendment right to ban protected speech They wanted to be treated special, then the should have to protect free speech. You should only be banned if you say something illegal. Uncle doom is the best kind of doom |
