Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,791 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 607,415
Pageviews Today: 794,059Threads Today: 229Posts Today: 3,197
07:00 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject As Team Biden moves us closer to Nuclear War With Russia, we should recall the Akita Prophecy and the reality of Atmospheric Nuclear Ignitition
Poster Handle Sisyphusrock
Post Content
Dude is this 1940 ..really atmosohereic ignition ?
The thing is there's is almost no fuel to sustain even a traditional ignition reaction in the atmosphere , let alone nuclear , unless you want to imagine a bomb larger in force than any comet strike the planet has had in the major exstinctions we know of.
We have had comet strikes ( recently in geological terms) that have more tons of TNT than every nuke combined on the planet . And the planet did not melt to its core.a chain reaction in the atmosphere , would also spread to the ocean , then the crust , and the planet would melt to its core......if you are talking about a nuclear ignition reaction .


But the math is fairly clear here :

No nukes large enough if you are talking either type of ignition : and of course ...hello the Earth is still here ( refer to comet point )
However early in Earths life , I'm sure it did have strikes this great and greater , where it was melted to its core and remolded , or what atmosphere heated and turned into plasma ; reconstituting itself as it cooled ..into some form of ionized gas mixture .
One theory for the moons origin is the impact hypothesis , which surely was a force far greater than that of a minimal reaction threshold .

I think even if you set every nuke on the planet off . The Compton effect always loses more energy due to radiation than gained with a nitrogen reaction... in the air . And hydrogen to helium is different thaN using deuterium .
As far as I am aware every nuke set off at once currently would make like a twenty mile crater . It would be a so - so sized impact equivalent I guess .
They would do more area damage if airbursted in a grid pattern , simultaneously.


Probably make some super hurricanes if thousand set off at one point .
Ignite the atmosphere no .


In theory you would need a ridiculously large nuke to accomplish atmospheric ignition on either level ... on a nuclear level the bomb would have to be so large ..its beyond your imagining .
The math on this has been done, many times. And of course nukes are much more well understood than they were , before one was ever tested , which of course is the origins of this myth . And the bet that occurred
Before the first bomb was tested ..
Hope that helps

I know it's hard to imagine the force a mountain sized object travelling at unimaginable speeds carries with it. But we have been hit by such objects , every nuke combined doesn't even come close to its impact destruction , and the atmosphere is still here . There was an impact possibly even 11,000 years ago ( The Hancock one off of Greenland , Atlantas etc.) that is some 1 million Hiroshima bombs if I recall , maybe 3 million . Yeah atmosphere still here .
Honestly I'm not sure how many Nukes it would take , and what kind of sequence . But I know it's a ridiculous amount .
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP