Why is there so much confusion in the abrahamic religions . Hear me out.

They don’t agree on what happens after death.

They don’t agree on End times scenarios.

They don’t agree on who or what God is.

The 2 biggest ones believe/insist there has to be a middleman (Antichrist/Dajjal) in the Messianic or "end times" (or whatever) process. That is, if there ever will be even JUST a Messiah, which of course doesn't seem likely.

for discussion

Islam is not a religion.

Islam is a non-secular Totalitarian GOVERNMENT.

OP you're way off base. It is about sacrificing children, and thus it is about the god of Abraham's time, the time of the holy scapegoat. If a god is pleased by abhorrent shedding of innocent blood, then what god is that? So, your whole pov shows how truly far off target the discussion is. Why, even today children are both the arrows people shoot and the baseball they would die to catch. The wonka ticket to parenthood and the bane of the rest of your life. It all orbits Abraham era and then Moses, who had daughters and was fully against the old ways. But did Moses believe in scapegoating? Damn it is sad I have to be the one to always type this out on glp, but there it is.

Why would Melchizedek be a unifying figure?
His religion was probably the first monotheism - Zoroastrianism.
They did not make their founder into a god after his death.

Amenhotep III was Solomon. Solomon is nowhere else in the historical record. There are many parallels in the amarna records. His son was the biblical forefather, he was Moses, Akhenaten. He is the Genesis dude, and the bible is him compiling the sins of his fathers and the priests, which he tried to set right. Typically, he was smashed by military lessers, horemheb and ramses and seti, then it was over. Daughter of Akhenaten sailed back to Ireland with her man Gathelos.

Furthermore it is understood that AIII was at least in part, the progenitor of Akhenaten's hatred of the priest cult, sodomites, which of course he himself recorded as he wrote Genesis and so forth. Also in the tale of the levite priest, and in psalms, does he show himself. So AIII had built a boat for his wife, "Aten Gleams", and thus, it is he who is the founder of atenism. His son simply fulfilled his father's orders. Similarly Amenhotep II had raised his father's half built obelisk, which stands in front of the vatican today.

"Abrahamic religions" is a loaded buzz term employed by Satanists, atheists, feminist wiccans, and other assorted biggoted assholes.

What do you mean ?

abra... cadabra.

You’re an uneducated putz.

Apparently, you’re completely ignorant to the fact all 3 of the world’s largest religious organizations (Christianity, Islam, and Jud-ism) all have ABRAHAM as their Patriarch.

Ergo, the “Abrahamic religions”.

Derp.

.

H3BR3WS
7 For this Melchizedek, king of Salem, priest of the Most High God, met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings and blessed him, 2 and Abraham gave* him a tenth of everything. First, his name is translated “King of Righteousness,” and then also king of Salem, that is, “King of Peace.” 3 In being fatherless, motherless, without genealogy, having neither a beginning of days nor an end of life, but being made like the Son of God, he remains a priest for all time.*

4 See how great this man was to whom Abraham, the family head,* gave a tenth out of the best spoils. 5 True, according to the Law, those of the sons of Levi who receive their priestly office have a commandment to collect tithes from the people, that is, from their brothers, even though these are descendants* of Abraham. 6 But this man who did not trace his genealogy from them took tithes from Abraham and blessed the one who had the promises. 7 Now it is undeniable that the lesser one is blessed by the greater. 8 And in the one case, it is men who are dying who receive tithes, but in the other case, it is someone of whom witness is given that he lives. 9 And it could be said that even Levi, who receives tithes, has paid tithes through Abraham, 10 for he was still a future descendant* of his forefather when Melchizedek met him.

11 If, then, perfection was attainable through the Levitical priesthood (for it was a feature of the Law that was given to the people), what further need would there be for another priest to arise who is said to be in the manner of Melchizedek and not in the manner of Aaron? 12 For since the priesthood is being changed, it becomes necessary to change the Law as well. 13 For the man about whom these things are said came from another tribe, from which no one has officiated at the altar. 14 For it is clear that our Lord has descended from Judah, yet Moses said nothing about priests coming from that tribe.

15 And this becomes even clearer when another priest arises who is like Melchizedek, 16 who has become such, not by the legal requirement that depends on fleshly descent, but by the power of an indestructible life. 17 For it is said in witness of him: “You are a priest forever in the manner of Melchizedek.”

18 So, then, the former commandment is set aside because it is weak and ineffective. 19 For the Law made nothing perfect, but the introduction of a better hope did, through which we are drawing near to God. 20 Also, inasmuch as this was not done without an oath being sworn 21 (for, indeed, there are men who have become priests without a sworn oath, but this one has become so through an oath sworn respecting him by the One who said: “Jehovah* has sworn, and he will not change his mind,* ‘You are a priest forever’”), 22 Jesus has accordingly become the guarantee* of a better covenant. 23 Furthermore, many had to become priests in succession because death prevented them from continuing as such, 24 but because he continues alive forever, his priesthood has no successors. 25 So he is able also to save completely those who are approaching God through him, because he is always alive to plead for them.

26 For it is fitting for us to have such a high priest who is loyal, innocent, undefiled, separated from the sinners, and exalted above the heavens. 27 Unlike those high priests, he does not need to offer up sacrifices daily, first for his own sins and then for those of the people, because he did this once for all time when he offered himself up. 28 For the Law appoints as high priests men who have weaknesses, but the word of the oath sworn after the Law appoints a Son, who has been made perfect forever.

Agreements between people are overrated, most of the time agreements aren't necessary and pursuing them causes more harm than anything.