Chauvin Trial Day 10 - Uncensored Alternative

No one will miss your comments, no one that isnt an evil piece of garbage.

Ha - you sure love to judge other people don't you?

If you dont learn to judge people you dont live very long, do you?

Tell me this, would you trust him?

Why not just answer the question he asked?

Yes, would love to hear his answer

Locking cops up is no good if they are the ones investigating themselves.
There needs to be an outside association that is only tasked with investigating police agencies. The would have no authority over you and I. And ALL public officials must be held to a higher standard. If the crime calls for a hundred dollar fine for us it should be 300 for public officials. If the punishment is 3 years for us it should be ten years for public officials.

They must also do away with the lie detector test.
Every group that uses the lie detector test tells the testee that there are no wrong answers and that it is an amnesty test.
Then they procede to ask about every crimal activity you have ever done, everything you know about and the absolute sickest $#!+ You can ever imagine.
Then you go about your life until one day you come across something that they want covered up, or they want you to do something that you don't want to do.
Suddenly your answers are very relevant.
Did your cousin cheat on his taxes? Do you look at hentai rape porn? Who will find this out? Go along to get along.

good for callin' him out.. not likely though.

No, I would not accept the verdict as fact. But he's never going to be acquitted. You will never get 12 people to let off a sadistic murderer who killed for pleasure.

It will be a hung jury, the jury is just as divided as the country, along the same lines.

Life is a test. You are failing.

Just because I may want to see his comments here doesn't prove why. Maybe I am for free speech and that all speech presents learning tools regardless of the lesson.

The world and system is not perfect, but we live in it.
You cannot claim justice cannot be served by only one verdict.
That is not justice, that is justifying the destruction of the system that you claim to hate, yet protects you.

That is the best comment on this thread.

IM STARTING TO 'FEEL' FOR ...THE JURORS!....WHAT A DELIB. THAT WILL BE. 1ST, THEY HAVE TO PICK A JURY FOREMAN...WHAT A DELIB. THAT WILL BE!....THEN, I HAVE '''NO DOUBT''' THAT AT LEAST ONE OF THEM IS ALREADY ON THE BLM PAYROLL...AND...THEY MIGHT NOT BE BLACK. UH. SHIT STORM. THEY R GOING TO ARGUE ABOUT 'WHERE TO GET LUNCH FROM--AND IF THE BUSINESS IS BLACK OWNED'....DO NOT DOUBT ME. UH, CAPMAN.

YES...UNTIL MINE JUST NOW..UH.

Ok so you answered part of the question, and I respect your right to that opinion. But what about this

"Will you condemn any and all violence associated with any verdict?"

You didn't answer that question, I would like to know.

I am sorry that you judge me as "failing" with so little information. That is more telling of you than me.

Do you realize there was no such thing as a cop anywhere in the entire country until the late 1800's in New York City?

Police are not true law enforcement officers, they are actually hired goons, policy enforcers who follow a code independent of the law who answer only to the jurisdiction that hires them, and occasionally but rarely federal prosecution. How many times have you heard the phrase "his actions were found to be within department policy"?

The media is doing their job in this case but probably for the wrong reasons IMO, if it hadn't been for the media Chauvin would have been exonerated by an in house "investigation" and a lot of test-a-lying, like the other 18 complaints of excessive force against him.

What we need to do is try all cops accused of misconduct in a citizens committee court not associated with any agenda or desire to protect them. Youre not going to see that in a state or county trial. Some of these crimes are international crimes btw if the involve systemic governemnt oppression.

..AND...AT LEAST ONE ASSHOLE THERE WILL MENTION WHY IT HAS TO BE CALLED A JURY 'FOREMAN'....'FOR-MAN'....AND...'MAN'.

OP, this trial is about murder.
It was set up to fail from the very start.
As the burden of proof is higher. A hung jury is as good as an acquittal.
If they had of tried Chauvin with manslaughter or even accidental death or bodily harm it would have been easier to secure a conviction.
The ptb decided to have a show trial, let the man off then sit back and watch while you and your friends burn down your own communities. Imho.

The first publicly funded, organized police force with officers on duty full-time was created in Boston in 1838. Boston was a large shipping commercial center, and businesses had been hiring people to protect their property and safeguard the transport of goods from the port of Boston to other places, says Potter. These merchants came up with a way to save money by transferring to the cost of maintaining a police force to citizens by arguing that it was for the “collective good.”


So prior to that policing was done by interested parties with money or MOB RULE. So while the current system isn't perfect it is better than previous.

GF killed himself. So far there has been no evidence that point to anyone attempting to end GF's life (except Morries HAll, but I guess he just doesnt feel like tslking...whatevs)

that is what i don't get. they already pulled the trick of getting the state to settle in a civil suit (to the tune of 27M)

why bring frivolous charges against Chauvin in a criminal case when the guy was clearly just doing his job (something that should be addressed and possibly remedied in the civil suit)? the only reason i can think of is to make this into a case about race, except they dont have a single shred of evidence to support that idea

No, absolutely not. I think that would be hypocritical. When someone is killing people and getting away with it due to systemic corruption, the correct response is resistance.

I would and do condemn any violence against the innocent

The 11th day of Chauvin Trial.
Something big is going to happen.

So,... OP, your logic is that the trial is only fair if it finds the man guilty based upon your personal opinion and not upon the facts of reality as presented at trial?
If found guilty, based upon your personal opinion then you accept the results?


Are you one of those simpletons who claim that math is racist because there is only a right and wrong answer?

I think they would have convicted a citizen of premeditated murder fairly easily. This was a depraved, sadistic murder and it took minutes to kill Floyd. The prosecution has already proved Chauvin was taught doing what he did would kill. The look on Chauvins face of pleasure will haunt any same man forever.

It is not an opinion that Chauvin murdered Floyd. At some point you have to realize that.

Dismissal of charges. Rest of the case not meeting the burden of proof.
Then BBQ city centers across the USA.

If Chauvins job is to murder people over 20 dollars, then we need a revolution

Do you actually believe that? Every expert has said CHauvin murdered Floyd

Chauvin was following procedure. How about we act like adults and actually get to the nitty gritty of the incident to see about possibly eliminating knee holds or similar? but, ok I guess burning down Wendy's and stealing coach purses might be a close second idea to improve policing