A flood of mud destroyed most of the world 150 years ago. We are descendants of the survivors.

When you stop and consider it - it would be easy enough to fake history prior to 1800s and sell it to the masses.

It is not BS

first stone quarries west of rocky mnts was 1880s...where did the stone come from that built the west coast prior??

AMER'ICAN, noun A native of America; originally applied to the aboriginals, or copper-colored races, found here by the Europeans; but now applied to the descendants of Europeans born in America.

The first Americans were descended from Australian aborigines, according to evidence in a new BBC documentary.

Until now, native Americans were believed to have descended from Asian ancestors who arrived over a land bridge between Siberia and Alaska and then migrated across the whole of north and south America. The land bridge was formed 11,000 years ago during the ice age, when sea level dropped.

However, the new evidence shows that these people did not arrive in an empty wilderness. Stone tools and charcoal from the site in Brazil show evidence of human habitation as long ago as 50,000 years.

The skull dimensions and facial features match most closely the native people of Australia and Melanesia. These people date back to about 60,000 years, and were themselves descended from the first humans, who left Africa about 100,000 years ago.

But how could the early Australians have travelled more than 13,500 kilometres (8,450 miles) at that time? The answer comes from more cave paintings, this time from the Kimberley, a region at the northern tip of Western Australia.

A DNA Search for the First Americans Links Amazon Groups to Indigenous Australians
The new genetic analysis takes aim at the theory that just one founding group settled the Americas


The prevailing theory is that the first Americans arrived in a single wave, and all Native American populations today descend from this one group of adventurous founders. But now there’s a kink in that theory. The latest genetic analyses back up skeletal studies suggesting that some groups in the Amazon share a common ancestor with indigenous Australians and New Guineans. The find hints at the possibility that not one but two groups migrated across these continents to give rise to the first Americans.

“Our results suggest this working model that we had is not correct. There’s another early population that founded modern Native American populations,” says study coauthor David Reich, a geneticist at Harvard University.

The Amer'icas have been peopled for at LEAST 50,000 years by indigenous Amer'ican N.egroes according to the BBC and the Smithsonian, as well as Webster's 1828 dictionary implicitly.


[link to webstersdictionary1828.com]


As such, the idea that the Amer'icas were "unbuilt" prior to the arrival of Europeans recently is not correct. We've had cities rise and fall dozens of times before Caucasians first came here. The old buildings in the Americas, the old roads, they were built BY US.

Amer'ica is Wakanda. Indigenous Amer'ican N'egroes are the Wakandans (which is why the black panther actor wasn't AFrican but an indigenous American). Black Panther was a story about what if Wakanda remained hidden (Ever notice how America is always more advanced than other countries?) What really happened is that Wakanda was invaded and forced open, and Caucasians have been looting it's treasures and exporting its spoils out ever since.

The Mud Flood theory, love it!

There is something to it.

But also other things happened around the same time, mid-late 19th century.

Orphans were relocated and resettled in US and Europe.

Much like they are being trafficted through the US-Mexico border now. But worldwide.

Wars were waged everywere, paraller to the Napoleonic wars, regimes were toppled etc.

The natural sedimentation theory must be wrong, in cities
too young for such to build.

Mr JonLevi's videos on the subject are the best.

He openly admits that he does not know what happened, merely
raises questions based on the photographic evidence available.

People seem to feel very threatened by said questions.
Emotions boil instantly, I see.

That Kentucky thing is weird

Silliest post recently, OP. Good job!

Normal flood patterns and volcanic activity have buried towns in the past centuries. But there was no global mud flood 150 years ago.

And the orphans? Many parents died early of disease or the wars. And there were no child labor laws yet...children were transported to where the mines and other workzones were located.

It really isnt...

This is even more stupid than flat earth theory

Was that the last magnetic reversal? If anything stops the Earth's rotation, the water and air will keep going with it's momentum. Everything is flooded up to the highest mountain peaks. Imagine that much water rushing up to the US continental divide, then flowing across the land and carving out the Grand Canyon as it recedes.

[link to theobservermagazine.substack.com (secure)]