You Can't Disagree with Anyone Anymore | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70663772 United States 04/19/2021 09:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What's left and what's right? I identify with the right, though it is not how you define it. I don't consider people who force others into agreement or conformity part of the right. That's a good question. The line of separation changes so often. What matters to me is that there were no political parties in 1776, and it seems to me that their inception is the moment in time when America began down the slippery slope away from what many of the founders intended. I didn't choose the word conservative as a definition, it is merely an association. The dichotomy of liberal/conservative is simply more meaningful and inordinately less subconsciously nefarious to me than left/right. As far as I was concerned at the time of submitting my post, neither I nor you had actually defined what right vs left is seen to be. |
Weyoun
(OP) User ID: 80247245 United States 04/19/2021 09:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So true. I’ve stopped speaking to several people who could not accept my differing opinion. If we can’t agree to disagree and still be amicable, I don’t need you in my life. Period. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77680920 Personally, I can't be friendly with anyone who rejects basic science for paranoid fantasy. Why not? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77738901 United States 04/19/2021 09:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Weyoun
(OP) User ID: 80247245 United States 04/19/2021 09:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What's left and what's right? I identify with the right, though it is not how you define it. I don't consider people who force others into agreement or conformity part of the right. That's a good question. The line of separation changes so often. What matters to me is that there were no political parties in 1776, and it seems to me that their inception is the moment in time when America began down the slippery slope away from what many of the founders intended. I didn't choose the word conservative as a definition, it is merely an association. The dichotomy of liberal/conservative is simply more meaningful and inordinately less subconsciously nefarious to me than left/right. As far as I was concerned at the time of submitting my post, neither I nor you had actually defined what right vs left is seen to be. I go with the Biblical definition of left vs right. "A wise man's heart directs him toward the right, but the foolish man's heart directs him toward the left." - Ecclesiastes 10:2 With that said, Solomon, who God called the wisest man ever was and ever will be, still sacrificed children to moloch. So, even the wisest man is "left" of God. God is perfection and infinitely right. Last Edited by Weyoun on 04/19/2021 09:45 AM |
Old Custer
User ID: 75543000 United States 04/19/2021 09:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Comic Book movies have created mental paradigm where people can only see reality in terms of good guys vs bad guys. Everyone is a rag tag freedom fighter going up against a evil empirical powerful conglomerate bent on enacting it's evil upon the people. Its so much more mentally rewarding than loosing weight or cleaning their house. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70663772 United States 04/19/2021 09:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The political anti-ideologues have arrived, boxing people into the right and wrong side of an argument yet again, and so what may have seemed like an opportunity for a respectful argument has swirled down the toilet. Quoting: deafcat People act like no liberal has ever disagreed with another liberal nor any conservative not seen eye-to-eye with another conservative. This is the root of the problem you're talking about OP. All these mother fuckers turning every argument into who is right and who is wrong based on political ideology. You could share any thoughts you could ever think of pertaining to a perceived issue in the behavior of people in society, and the anti-ideologues of GLP will presume you're talking about liberals and then get butthurt if you don't agree with them that everyone on the left is the problem and everyone on the right is OK. Everyone that identifies with either the left or the right is the problem. I sympathize with the view that politicians on both the right and the left are controlled by a ruling elite, and that they're acting in concert to bring about a wicked agenda. However, if you're not just talking about politicians and are extending your objections to ideology, then I strongly disagree. While politicians on both sides may be two sides of the same coin, right wing ideology is very different from left wing ideology. It is my opinion that ideologically, the left is wrong on nearly every issue and I see no problem with identifying with a political position. I do object to ideologies, in every form they take. I disagree with as much that the right wing stands for as I do that the left wing stands for, and thus I would rather stand alone than concede to things I disagree with in order to belong to a party. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 20003953 United States 04/19/2021 09:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So true. I’ve stopped speaking to several people who could not accept my differing opinion. If we can’t agree to disagree and still be amicable, I don’t need you in my life. Period. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77680920 Personally, I can't be friendly with anyone who rejects basic science for paranoid fantasy. Why not? He's stuck in the fake evolution lie. Modern science is nothing but bought off hacks. |
Baloney
User ID: 75923721 United States 04/19/2021 09:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There was a time when people could agree to disagree and remained amicable in their differences. Nowadays, diversity is banned and if you disagree with someone they hate you and try to kill you or worse. Quoting: Weyoun Many people these days think they are gods and try to shape the world to their own delusions, including try to shape other people. They are control freaks who cannot stand the existence of people who think and act independantly. Everyone must be under their control, both body and mind, or else. True. anyone who doesn't agree with the liberal agenda and/or the current politically "correct" stances on issues is labeled a bigot, a hater. their free speech is trampled on particularly within social media, or they are given the newest label of "extremist". |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78414953 United States 04/19/2021 09:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So true. I’ve stopped speaking to several people who could not accept my differing opinion. If we can’t agree to disagree and still be amicable, I don’t need you in my life. Period. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77680920 Personally, I can't be friendly with anyone who rejects basic science for paranoid fantasy. Why not? I'm not sure, to be honest. If it's a personal belief, I'm usually fine. When they try to force the beliefs on others, it's a problem. Also, being called a "shill" by idiots who are obviously clueless, doesn't make me want to be associated with them. It's paranoia. I prefer expert scientific explanations over woo. Those who accept woo as truth, while rejecting obviously basic science, come across as simple and unworthy to me. Would you want to be friendly with anyone who insisted the sky is red and the grass purple, and called you a shill for disagreeing? That's how I feel about the chemtrail hoax. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78703378 United States 04/19/2021 09:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There was a time when people could agree to disagree and remained amicable in their differences. Nowadays, diversity is banned and if you disagree with someone they hate you and try to kill you or worse. Quoting: Weyoun Many people these days think they are gods and try to shape the world to their own delusions, including try to shape other people. They are control freaks who cannot stand the existence of people who think and act independantly. Everyone must be under their control, both body and mind, or else. Just another way social media and handhelds are ruining everything. |
Weyoun
(OP) User ID: 80247245 United States 04/19/2021 09:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So true. I’ve stopped speaking to several people who could not accept my differing opinion. If we can’t agree to disagree and still be amicable, I don’t need you in my life. Period. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77680920 Personally, I can't be friendly with anyone who rejects basic science for paranoid fantasy. Why not? Would you want to be friendly with anyone who insisted the sky is red and the grass purple, and called you a shill for disagreeing? Yes. I try my best. I don't always succeed because I'm not perfect, but I try to love everyone just as God loved me. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80260273 United States 04/19/2021 09:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There was a time when people could agree to disagree and remained amicable in their differences. Nowadays, diversity is banned and if you disagree with someone they hate you and try to kill you or worse. Quoting: Weyoun Many people these days think they are gods and try to shape the world to their own delusions, including try to shape other people. They are control freaks who cannot stand the existence of people who think and act independantly. Everyone must be under their control, both body and mind, or else. Many - especially brainwashed Millennials - do this. It's infuriating. |
Plant Goddess
User ID: 79736903 United States 04/19/2021 09:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Funny thing is that most people don't really fit within the labels of Liberal or Conservative and fall within the realm of Centrists or damned close to it. We are socially liberal and fiscally conservative. We don't care how others live their lives as long as they leave us the hell alone and we don't have to pay for their choices. It's such a shame that loudmouthed extremists are demanding that everyone choose a side and that weak minded people are lapping it up. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70663772 United States 04/19/2021 09:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What's left and what's right? I identify with the right, though it is not how you define it. I don't consider people who force others into agreement or conformity part of the right. That's a good question. The line of separation changes so often. What matters to me is that there were no political parties in 1776, and it seems to me that their inception is the moment in time when America began down the slippery slope away from what many of the founders intended. I didn't choose the word conservative as a definition, it is merely an association. The dichotomy of liberal/conservative is simply more meaningful and inordinately less subconsciously nefarious to me than left/right. As far as I was concerned at the time of submitting my post, neither I nor you had actually defined what right vs left is seen to be. I go with the Biblical definition of left vs right. "A wise man's heart directs him toward the right, but the foolish man's heart directs him toward the left." - Ecclesiastes 10:2 With that said, Solomon, who God called the wisest man ever was and ever will be, still sacrificed children to moloch. So, even the wisest man is "left" of God. God is perfection and infinitely right. That is precisely what I alluded to with subconsciously nefarious use of words. I do not know the language that Bible quote was written in, and I do not trust the people who translated it. I know a thing or two about the right hand / left hand paths, though, so if assuming the translation to be in line with that distinction, it has nothing at all to do with the modern day political right/left ideologies. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78414953 United States 04/19/2021 09:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There was a time when people could agree to disagree and remained amicable in their differences. Nowadays, diversity is banned and if you disagree with someone they hate you and try to kill you or worse. Quoting: Weyoun Many people these days think they are gods and try to shape the world to their own delusions, including try to shape other people. They are control freaks who cannot stand the existence of people who think and act independantly. Everyone must be under their control, both body and mind, or else. True. anyone who doesn't agree with the liberal agenda and/or the current politically "correct" stances on issues is labeled a bigot, a hater. their free speech is trampled on particularly within social media, or they are given the newest label of "extremist". Only the extremists. What "liberal agenda"?! "Liberals" just want to live their lives as they want. Just like conservatives. Being politically correct is about being civil to your fellow man. If that's a problem, there is an obvious root cause. You don't think there should be limits on free speech? Should a racist bigot be able to say whatever they want about black people, in public? Should I be able to say anything I want about your mother? In my opinion, anyone who says yes, is an extremist. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80146829 United States 04/19/2021 09:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 20003953 United States 04/19/2021 09:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There was a time when people could agree to disagree and remained amicable in their differences. Nowadays, diversity is banned and if you disagree with someone they hate you and try to kill you or worse. Quoting: Weyoun Many people these days think they are gods and try to shape the world to their own delusions, including try to shape other people. They are control freaks who cannot stand the existence of people who think and act independantly. Everyone must be under their control, both body and mind, or else. True. anyone who doesn't agree with the liberal agenda and/or the current politically "correct" stances on issues is labeled a bigot, a hater. their free speech is trampled on particularly within social media, or they are given the newest label of "extremist". What group is the most effective at using this? I'll give you a hint. Conservatives call them our best ally after the murdered our sailors on the USS Liberty. Now this ally owns your politicians who restrict your first Amendment God given right to freedom of speech. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79995328 United States 04/19/2021 09:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Weyoun
(OP) User ID: 80247245 United States 04/19/2021 09:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
darkwolf007
User ID: 458937 United States 04/19/2021 10:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There was a time when people could agree to disagree and remained amicable in their differences. Nowadays, diversity is banned and if you disagree with someone they hate you and try to kill you or worse. Quoting: Weyoun Many people these days think they are gods and try to shape the world to their own delusions, including try to shape other people. They are control freaks who cannot stand the existence of people who think and act independantly. Everyone must be under their control, both body and mind, or else. I disagree! You now must die, OP!! RAWRRR!! Seriously though, OP, I get ya. I made a thread of a kinda sorta similar topic: Thread: YES, The Adam Toledo Video Was Edited To Push A LIE! I have yet to deal with anyone remotely like how you described in real life, OP. This gs individual whoever that was last night in this thread last night is most definitely like how you described in your OP, OP. Thread: This website has drifted immensely from its original intention (Page 2) I was not being a POS to them. Yet they came out assailing me for gosh darn reason. In real life, chances are I would of fought back as ferociously as I could. I have learned a long time ago through multiple up to terrible life experiences with other people that you MUST absolutely stand up for yourself in those moments as they happen. Otherwise other people learn very quickly you have no spine, testicular, and/or ovarian fortitude. From such moments you are relentlessly tortured, gaslighted, and/or worse from up to everyone around you. This is precisely why I tend to lose my cool up to easily on this site and anywhere else online and/or in real life under similar situations. Trying to maintain a sunny disposition in life is not an easy task. Especially when up to everyone around you online and/or in real life are hellbent on permanently darkening everything about you. Conspiracy Theorist is nothing more than a derogatory title used to dismiss a critical thinker. A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him, saying, 'You are mad; you are not like us." -- St. Anthony The Great Social Credit Loser here. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80245500 United States 04/19/2021 10:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80146829 United States 04/19/2021 10:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 39516942 United States 04/19/2021 10:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
darkwolf007
User ID: 458937 United States 04/19/2021 10:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So true. I’ve stopped speaking to several people who could not accept my differing opinion. If we can’t agree to disagree and still be amicable, I don’t need you in my life. Period. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77680920 Personally, I can't be friendly with anyone who rejects basic science for paranoid fantasy. Why not? I'm not sure, to be honest. If it's a personal belief, I'm usually fine. When they try to force the beliefs on others, it's a problem. Also, being called a "shill" by idiots who are obviously clueless, doesn't make me want to be associated with them. It's paranoia. I prefer expert scientific explanations over woo. Those who accept woo as truth, while rejecting obviously basic science, come across as simple and unworthy to me. Would you want to be friendly with anyone who insisted the sky is red and the grass purple, and called you a shill for disagreeing? That's how I feel about the chemtrail hoax. You were making sense for a second there, AC. There was a GLPer who had made it virtually impossible to respect them and had an ever lengthening Red Karma bar. That GLPer also spoke remarkably similar to you, AC. I would not be a bit surprised that same GLPer also said my scientific evidence based thread on the Illuminati's active geoengineering efforts of the entire Earth was full of "woo" or some other nonsense. Therefore I proved that GLPer to be full of crap from then onwards. Thread: Its Raining Rothschild Chemtrails Nano Tech Morgellons Conspiracy Theorist is nothing more than a derogatory title used to dismiss a critical thinker. A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him, saying, 'You are mad; you are not like us." -- St. Anthony The Great Social Credit Loser here. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78414953 United States 04/19/2021 10:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78414953 Personally, I can't be friendly with anyone who rejects basic science for paranoid fantasy. Why not? Would you want to be friendly with anyone who insisted the sky is red and the grass purple, and called you a shill for disagreeing? Yes. I try my best. I don't always succeed because I'm not perfect, but I try to love everyone just as God loved me. That's another part of it. No one asked you about "god", but you had to put it in there. Do you pit it in there to suggest your faith in "god" leads you down the ONLY true path? Also, I see many who claim the same thing, but are absolutely HORRIBLE to others, and come across as hypocrites. I can't be friendly with a hypocrite, either. Many people on this very site tell me that "god" is going to punish me for understanding contrails, the shape of the earth, the truth about vaccines. I disagree...but am often the one banned for my opinion. Why? Because I'm not a conservative. My scientific ("Liberal") positions aren't welcome here. It's not about agreeing to disagree, it's obvious censorship to push the conservative agenda! |
Weyoun
(OP) User ID: 80247245 United States 04/19/2021 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Would you want to be friendly with anyone who insisted the sky is red and the grass purple, and called you a shill for disagreeing? Yes. I try my best. I don't always succeed because I'm not perfect, but I try to love everyone just as God loved me. That's another part of it. No one asked you about "god", but you had to put it in there. Do you pit it in there to suggest your faith in "god" leads you down the ONLY true path? Also, I see many who claim the same thing, but are absolutely HORRIBLE to others, and come across as hypocrites. I can't be friendly with a hypocrite, either. Many people on this very site tell me that "god" is going to punish me for understanding contrails, the shape of the earth, the truth about vaccines. I disagree...but am often the one banned for my opinion. Why? Because I'm not a conservative. My scientific ("Liberal") positions aren't welcome here. It's not about agreeing to disagree, it's obvious censorship to push the conservative agenda! No one can force you to believe in God. Anyone who tortures you like a catholic inquisitor is actually of satan and not of God. God can punish whoever He wants, for whatever He wants, however He wants. By nature of being God, He is not subject to humon rules and standards. Whether God will punish you for something, that's between you and God. Most consequences of sin is not really God punishing you, but just cause-and-effect, that is you punishing yourself inadverdently. Last Edited by Weyoun on 04/19/2021 10:12 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78414953 United States 04/19/2021 10:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78414953 Personally, I can't be friendly with anyone who rejects basic science for paranoid fantasy. Why not? I'm not sure, to be honest. If it's a personal belief, I'm usually fine. When they try to force the beliefs on others, it's a problem. Also, being called a "shill" by idiots who are obviously clueless, doesn't make me want to be associated with them. It's paranoia. I prefer expert scientific explanations over woo. Those who accept woo as truth, while rejecting obviously basic science, come across as simple and unworthy to me. Would you want to be friendly with anyone who insisted the sky is red and the grass purple, and called you a shill for disagreeing? That's how I feel about the chemtrail hoax. You were making sense for a second there, AC. There was a GLPer who had made it virtually impossible to respect them and had an ever lengthening Red Karma bar. That GLPer also spoke remarkably similar to you, AC. I would not be a bit surprised that same GLPer also said my scientific evidence based thread on the Illuminati's active geoengineering efforts of the entire Earth was full of "woo" or some other nonsense. Therefore I proved that GLPer to be full of crap from then onwards. Thread: Its Raining Rothschild Chemtrails Nano Tech Morgellons You have a difficult time paying attention. ADHD? Gwoengineering and the trails that form behind jet engines have nothing to do with each other. You BELIEVE they do because you make assumptions about subjects you've never actually studied. You "learned" that geoengineering through SRM is about "spraying chemicals" from "aircraft" and you "look up" and then assume. Red Karma against those with scientific minds, on a woo site, just means there are more people on the site who accept woo as truth. That doesn't make the person with the red karma, and the scientific mind, wrong. It just means there are many people who believe the woo compared to those who believe the science. I'm sure you wouldn't be well received on an aviation site if you were to try to post such silly nonsense. You wouldn't last a day and you'd be calling EVERYONE on the site, "shill" based on YOUR ignorance. The fact that you put any value in the "Karma" system, is hilarious. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78414953 United States 04/19/2021 10:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78414953 Would you want to be friendly with anyone who insisted the sky is red and the grass purple, and called you a shill for disagreeing? Yes. I try my best. I don't always succeed because I'm not perfect, but I try to love everyone just as God loved me. That's another part of it. No one asked you about "god", but you had to put it in there. Do you pit it in there to suggest your faith in "god" leads you down the ONLY true path? Also, I see many who claim the same thing, but are absolutely HORRIBLE to others, and come across as hypocrites. I can't be friendly with a hypocrite, either. Many people on this very site tell me that "god" is going to punish me for understanding contrails, the shape of the earth, the truth about vaccines. I disagree...but am often the one banned for my opinion. Why? Because I'm not a conservative. My scientific ("Liberal") positions aren't welcome here. It's not about agreeing to disagree, it's obvious censorship to push the conservative agenda! No one can force you to believe in God. Anyone who tortures you like a catholic inquisitor is actually of satan and not of God. God can punish whoever He wants, for whatever He wants, however He wants. By nature of being God, He is not subject to humon rules and standards. Whether God will punish you for something, that's between you and God. Most consequences of sin is not really God punishing you, but just cause-and-effect, that is you punishing yourself inadverdently. I believe in "god" just not religions interpretation of what God is, or believes, or does. No man, through all of history, has ever known the truth of God. No matter how many stories they have read. It's unknowable. And man forcing their beliefs about it is just wrong. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78414953 United States 04/19/2021 10:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Rabbit In The Hat
User ID: 79363818 United States 04/19/2021 10:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |