THERMONUCLEAR: CDC finally admits that the Pandemic was indeed a Hoax | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79565454 United States 05/01/2021 12:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78008350 There is so much delusion in your post I can’t even... If 500k people died of “covid”, and the test were only 20% accurate that means only 100k actually died of covid... So no, the mortality rates would not stay the same... Furthermore infected would also be decreased by 80%.... So yes, it completely matters if the test is only 20% accurate... which they were.. We all know this... Predictably, it went over your head. Most people aren't capable of understanding basic statistics, that's why those attempts by average blokes at understanding the pandemic are doomed to fail. Once again, You have EXCESS MORTALITY RATES for each week in each Western country, which are independent of COVID tests, they are just excess mortality regardless of the cause You take the graph of excess mortality rates week by week You put it on the same timeline of COVID pandemic If they match 95% (which they do, but you don't have to trust me, you can do it yourself)- it is OBVIOUS what the cause is and how many people really died of COVID, regardless of the accuracy of tests In fact the numbers are underrated, because many people died without being tested, but excess mortality rates show the true numbers of deaths I'm sure you will say now "but those are deaths caused by the lack of healthcare and other causes" etc excuses, that's why I'm emphasising you have to put the graphs together. If number of deaths is correlated with number of COVID cases weekly and nothing else, then it's obvious the cause was COVID and nothing else. You probably won't understand this either...but anyway, that's the truth. Here is what goes over your head. The same people "reporting" excess mortality are the same people using faulty Covid tests. More, when the medical community is eliminating effective protocols like Hydroxychloroquine plus zinc, for Tylenol and Gaterade then one would expect mortality to go up. More, when blue state governors are sending covid patients to nursing homes, it should be no surprise thousands of dead Nanas spike the mortality rate. More, any mortality rate graph should be compared and averaged by mortality rates from previous years, not compare an "excess mortality rate" graph to reported deaths from Covid in the same year. "Excess mortality rate" graph begs the question whether in fact there is excess mortality. An excess mortality rate assumes there is excess mortality and doesn't prove it, and again, the data is put together by the same people with vested interests in proving a Covid 19 epidemic. What exactly does 'excess mortality' mean? Death numbers SHOULD be going up at this time, with a 78 year average life expectancy and considering the world wide crash and then the huge boom in the 40's. Omg, what a brilliant point!!! The demographics alone would have given us higher deaths this year with an expectation of it rising over the next three or four years based solely on the fact that those born at the height of the pist-war boom (1946-1952) are now reaching the statistical probability of death. Freaking brilliant! We would see a natural jump right now if only due to this fact of demographics! If this is fraud they timed it perfectly to obfuscate this demographic reality. Thank you for adding a new dimension to this for me. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79149163 Canada 05/01/2021 12:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18673709 Predictably, it went over your head. Most people aren't capable of understanding basic statistics, that's why those attempts by average blokes at understanding the pandemic are doomed to fail. Once again, You have EXCESS MORTALITY RATES for each week in each Western country, which are independent of COVID tests, they are just excess mortality regardless of the cause You take the graph of excess mortality rates week by week You put it on the same timeline of COVID pandemic If they match 95% (which they do, but you don't have to trust me, you can do it yourself)- it is OBVIOUS what the cause is and how many people really died of COVID, regardless of the accuracy of tests In fact the numbers are underrated, because many people died without being tested, but excess mortality rates show the true numbers of deaths I'm sure you will say now "but those are deaths caused by the lack of healthcare and other causes" etc excuses, that's why I'm emphasising you have to put the graphs together. If number of deaths is correlated with number of COVID cases weekly and nothing else, then it's obvious the cause was COVID and nothing else. You probably won't understand this either...but anyway, that's the truth. Here is what goes over your head. The same people "reporting" excess mortality are the same people using faulty Covid tests. More, when the medical community is eliminating effective protocols like Hydroxychloroquine plus zinc, for Tylenol and Gaterade then one would expect mortality to go up. More, when blue state governors are sending covid patients to nursing homes, it should be no surprise thousands of dead Nanas spike the mortality rate. More, any mortality rate graph should be compared and averaged by mortality rates from previous years, not compare an "excess mortality rate" graph to reported deaths from Covid in the same year. "Excess mortality rate" graph begs the question whether in fact there is excess mortality. An excess mortality rate assumes there is excess mortality and doesn't prove it, and again, the data is put together by the same people with vested interests in proving a Covid 19 epidemic. What exactly does 'excess mortality' mean? Death numbers SHOULD be going up at this time, with a 78 year average life expectancy and considering the world wide crash and then the huge boom in the 40's. Omg, what a brilliant point!!! The demographics alone would have given us higher deaths this year with an expectation of it rising over the next three or four years based solely on the fact that those born at the height of the pist-war boom (1946-1952) are now reaching the statistical probability of death. Freaking brilliant! We would see a natural jump right now if only due to this fact of demographics! If this is fraud they timed it perfectly to obfuscate this demographic reality. Thank you for adding a new dimension to this for me. This ^^^^^ ! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79096761 United States 05/01/2021 01:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sheesh ... it is a REAL virus, get over it people. For most people under 50 it is a Nothing Burger (with the early variations at least), BUT, for people over 70 or people with co-morbidities such as OVERWEIGHT (biggest), Diabetes, or other chronic conditions it can be a killer because of it's A) lung attacking function and B) blood thickening dynamic (because that then causes other organ failures), and the triggering of the body's response mechanisms. Like any other virus people tend to catch it from other people. No medical science hocus pocus or secret there. Distancing DOES help slow it's spread. Masks do help slow it's spread (particularly if an infected person is the one wearing the mask), and avoiding large crowds helps slow it's spread. In addition making sure you have adequate "nutrition", ie: eating balanced meals and are taking the general basket of vitamins recommended here, helps to build up your own body's immune system (imo). I know two people who have died from it and several other who caught it. For most of those who caught it they had light cases and it was no worse than the regular flu, but I also know two people who ended up being ventilated and another 4 who ended up in the hospital. I myself have too many questions about the mRNA vaccines but I am in the process of getting vaccinated since I am in a dual risk group (both age and overweight) but NOT with one of the mRNA vaccines. STOP ignoring reality!! Covid Virus IS REAL and it can be DEADLY if you end up being older or one of the "unlucky" ones. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80290932 Italy 05/01/2021 01:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sheesh ... it is a REAL virus, get over it people. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79096761 For most people under 50 it is a Nothing Burger (with the early variations at least), BUT, for people over 70 or people with co-morbidities such as OVERWEIGHT (biggest), Diabetes, or other chronic conditions it can be a killer because of it's A) lung attacking function and B) blood thickening dynamic (because that then causes other organ failures), and the triggering of the body's response mechanisms. Like any other virus people tend to catch it from other people. No medical science hocus pocus or secret there. Distancing DOES help slow it's spread. Masks do help slow it's spread (particularly if an infected person is the one wearing the mask), and avoiding large crowds helps slow it's spread. In addition making sure you have adequate "nutrition", ie: eating balanced meals and are taking the general basket of vitamins recommended here, helps to build up your own body's immune system (imo). I know two people who have died from it and several other who caught it. For most of those who caught it they had light cases and it was no worse than the regular flu, but I also know two people who ended up being ventilated and another 4 who ended up in the hospital. I myself have too many questions about the mRNA vaccines but I am in the process of getting vaccinated since I am in a dual risk group (both age and overweight) but NOT with one of the mRNA vaccines. STOP ignoring reality!! Covid Virus IS REAL and it can be DEADLY if you end up being older or one of the "unlucky" ones. Ignoring reality? I haven't seen a single person die in front of me, keel over, bitch about a flu or about anything IN REALITY for over a year.. LMAO I think you need to redefine what reality is and shut off your iPhone and pornhub that keeps feeding you, your reality. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80301970 Germany 05/01/2021 01:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Covid Virus IS REAL and it can be DEADLY if you end up being older or one of the "unlucky" ones. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79096761 That's exactly what "The Flu" does since centuries. [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Get over it. They fooled you by telling you the flu would be a new disease called "covid". |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79620735 United States 05/01/2021 02:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18673709 Poland 05/01/2021 02:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's the link: [link to www.cdc.gov (secure)] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18673709 You have a breakdown of all-cause mortality WEEK BY WEEK Strangely, it is almost identical to the graph of COVID infections. Again: Your "upper bound threshold for excess deaths" is a fixed curve which does not consider the long time dynamics. And again the long-term graph: [link to www.macrotrends.net (secure)] You said before this data would not include covid deaths in 2020, but this makes not much difference. The CDC provides only PROVISIONAL data from 2020: [link to www.cdc.gov (secure)] "In 2020, approximately 3,358,814 deaths† occurred in the United States." "The COVID-19 pandemic caused approximately 375,000 deaths in the United States during 2020." That means even if we belive their forged numbers then covid raises the numbers only by 10%. Now set the 2020 macrotrends point 10% higher. Does this change anything into a pandemic? It is completely irrelevant Check total deaths in 2020 and compare to average of the last 10 years. As you yourself noticed, it's some 500.000 over average. 50 years ago doesn't matter, because mortality has been going down due to advances in science. Mortality from 1978 is irrelevant. You could also say that mortality was much higher in 1900, when there was no antibitics, which would also be true, but it's completely irrelevant to the current pandemic. Only last 10 years are relevant. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78619133 United States 05/01/2021 02:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I know people that work in hospitals (two daughters and more). They have seen people labeled as covid positive and put on respirators. THIS IS A DEATH SENTENCE. One of my kids works with kids in the hospital and has had parents declared covid put on a respirator, the kid is positive for covid. When the parent dies, the kid says goodbye over a tablet/zoom. My daughter believes the Drs. and wants to believe the medical professionals/hospitals would not be doing this purposefully. When ones beliefs are challenged we all want to believe what is right, and it is very difficult to believe that medical professionals are killing us. The whole hospital is like this. Overcoming the thought that they are being lied to and killing people is very difficult to say the least. Waking up means you have to admit to participating in some really bad stuff; very dark. They will wake up in due time, and how many will then leave the medical field, commit suicide when they find out they were responsible for all of these deaths, or just be depressed and ill functioning. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80299286 To be truthful, there is a virus. It does make people sick. Some do die. The tests are a lie. The numbers are a lie. This virus does have neurological affects and could leave you with lasting damage. It is not what we have been told. We have been played. It is time to stop being played and afraid and step up as an informed citizen and a fighter for this country. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18673709 Poland 05/01/2021 02:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Covid Virus IS REAL and it can be DEADLY if you end up being older or one of the "unlucky" ones. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79096761 That's exactly what "The Flu" does since centuries. [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Get over it. They fooled you by telling you the flu would be a new disease called "covid". "Older" and "unlucky" ones are people too. And you don't know who will be the "unlucky" one. It might be someone close to you as well. It's just it hasn't hit you yet so you close your eyes and start coping mechanism "it doesn't exist". From experience it's always someone else who dies, but that doesn't mean death is a hoax. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18673709 Poland 05/01/2021 02:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18673709 Predictably, it went over your head. Most people aren't capable of understanding basic statistics, that's why those attempts by average blokes at understanding the pandemic are doomed to fail. Once again, You have EXCESS MORTALITY RATES for each week in each Western country, which are independent of COVID tests, they are just excess mortality regardless of the cause You take the graph of excess mortality rates week by week You put it on the same timeline of COVID pandemic If they match 95% (which they do, but you don't have to trust me, you can do it yourself)- it is OBVIOUS what the cause is and how many people really died of COVID, regardless of the accuracy of tests In fact the numbers are underrated, because many people died without being tested, but excess mortality rates show the true numbers of deaths I'm sure you will say now "but those are deaths caused by the lack of healthcare and other causes" etc excuses, that's why I'm emphasising you have to put the graphs together. If number of deaths is correlated with number of COVID cases weekly and nothing else, then it's obvious the cause was COVID and nothing else. You probably won't understand this either...but anyway, that's the truth. Here is what goes over your head. The same people "reporting" excess mortality are the same people using faulty Covid tests. More, when the medical community is eliminating effective protocols like Hydroxychloroquine plus zinc, for Tylenol and Gaterade then one would expect mortality to go up. More, when blue state governors are sending covid patients to nursing homes, it should be no surprise thousands of dead Nanas spike the mortality rate. More, any mortality rate graph should be compared and averaged by mortality rates from previous years, not compare an "excess mortality rate" graph to reported deaths from Covid in the same year. "Excess mortality rate" graph begs the question whether in fact there is excess mortality. An excess mortality rate assumes there is excess mortality and doesn't prove it, and again, the data is put together by the same people with vested interests in proving a Covid 19 epidemic. What exactly does 'excess mortality' mean? Death numbers SHOULD be going up at this time, with a 78 year average life expectancy and considering the world wide crash and then the huge boom in the 40's. Omg, what a brilliant point!!! The demographics alone would have given us higher deaths this year with an expectation of it rising over the next three or four years based solely on the fact that those born at the height of the pist-war boom (1946-1952) are now reaching the statistical probability of death. Freaking brilliant! We would see a natural jump right now if only due to this fact of demographics! If this is fraud they timed it perfectly to obfuscate this demographic reality. Thank you for adding a new dimension to this for me. Yes, suddenly THIS YEAR (not last year) and timed perfectly with the COVID waves. What a coincidence, they planned it perfectly, didn't they? |
Gorgol
User ID: 78275908 Netherlands 05/01/2021 02:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sheesh ... it is a REAL virus, get over it people. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79096761 For most people under 50 it is a Nothing Burger (with the early variations at least), BUT, for people over 70 or people with co-morbidities such as OVERWEIGHT (biggest), Diabetes, or other chronic conditions it can be a killer because of it's A) lung attacking function and B) blood thickening dynamic (because that then causes other organ failures), and the triggering of the body's response mechanisms. Like any other virus people tend to catch it from other people. No medical science hocus pocus or secret there. Distancing DOES help slow it's spread. Masks do help slow it's spread (particularly if an infected person is the one wearing the mask), and avoiding large crowds helps slow it's spread. In addition making sure you have adequate "nutrition", ie: eating balanced meals and are taking the general basket of vitamins recommended here, helps to build up your own body's immune system (imo). I know two people who have died from it and several other who caught it. For most of those who caught it they had light cases and it was no worse than the regular flu, but I also know two people who ended up being ventilated and another 4 who ended up in the hospital. I myself have too many questions about the mRNA vaccines but I am in the process of getting vaccinated since I am in a dual risk group (both age and overweight) but NOT with one of the mRNA vaccines. STOP ignoring reality!! Covid Virus IS REAL and it can be DEADLY if you end up being older or one of the "unlucky" ones. Prove SCIENTIFICALLY the existence of Covid19/Sars-Cov2 Yeh you can't, because you'd be the FIRST IN THE WORLD Being intelligent enough to repeat things is not the same as being smart Last Edited by Gorgol on 05/01/2021 02:55 PM Gorgol -No Jab, No Jitter |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79149163 Canada 05/01/2021 02:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80301615 Here is what goes over your head. The same people "reporting" excess mortality are the same people using faulty Covid tests. More, when the medical community is eliminating effective protocols like Hydroxychloroquine plus zinc, for Tylenol and Gaterade then one would expect mortality to go up. More, when blue state governors are sending covid patients to nursing homes, it should be no surprise thousands of dead Nanas spike the mortality rate. More, any mortality rate graph should be compared and averaged by mortality rates from previous years, not compare an "excess mortality rate" graph to reported deaths from Covid in the same year. "Excess mortality rate" graph begs the question whether in fact there is excess mortality. An excess mortality rate assumes there is excess mortality and doesn't prove it, and again, the data is put together by the same people with vested interests in proving a Covid 19 epidemic. What exactly does 'excess mortality' mean? Death numbers SHOULD be going up at this time, with a 78 year average life expectancy and considering the world wide crash and then the huge boom in the 40's. Omg, what a brilliant point!!! The demographics alone would have given us higher deaths this year with an expectation of it rising over the next three or four years based solely on the fact that those born at the height of the pist-war boom (1946-1952) are now reaching the statistical probability of death. Freaking brilliant! We would see a natural jump right now if only due to this fact of demographics! If this is fraud they timed it perfectly to obfuscate this demographic reality. Thank you for adding a new dimension to this for me. Yes, suddenly THIS YEAR (not last year) and timed perfectly with the COVID waves. What a coincidence, they planned it perfectly, didn't they? They did plan, event 201 was a simulation for a pandemic just months beforehand. Watch the videos! [link to www.centerforhealthsecurity.org (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80002310 United States 05/01/2021 03:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1397910 United States 05/01/2021 03:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don’t see how any person can look at what’s happening in India right this very minute and not think that COVID is a real problem. Do leftists gin up the nature of the threat? Of course they do. Do right-wingers downplay the nature of the threat? Of course they do. It’s a shame everything about this has become as politicized as it is. When you look at COVID realistically, you see a very real disease that has a mortality rate probably the same as or even less than the season flu, but which is considerably more contagious. The extremist bullshit interpretations of it on EACH SIDE are starting to get real fucking old. Quit participating in it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79565454 United States 05/01/2021 03:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80301615 Here is what goes over your head. The same people "reporting" excess mortality are the same people using faulty Covid tests. More, when the medical community is eliminating effective protocols like Hydroxychloroquine plus zinc, for Tylenol and Gaterade then one would expect mortality to go up. More, when blue state governors are sending covid patients to nursing homes, it should be no surprise thousands of dead Nanas spike the mortality rate. More, any mortality rate graph should be compared and averaged by mortality rates from previous years, not compare an "excess mortality rate" graph to reported deaths from Covid in the same year. "Excess mortality rate" graph begs the question whether in fact there is excess mortality. An excess mortality rate assumes there is excess mortality and doesn't prove it, and again, the data is put together by the same people with vested interests in proving a Covid 19 epidemic. What exactly does 'excess mortality' mean? Death numbers SHOULD be going up at this time, with a 78 year average life expectancy and considering the world wide crash and then the huge boom in the 40's. Omg, what a brilliant point!!! The demographics alone would have given us higher deaths this year with an expectation of it rising over the next three or four years based solely on the fact that those born at the height of the pist-war boom (1946-1952) are now reaching the statistical probability of death. Freaking brilliant! We would see a natural jump right now if only due to this fact of demographics! If this is fraud they timed it perfectly to obfuscate this demographic reality. Thank you for adding a new dimension to this for me. Yes, suddenly THIS YEAR (not last year) and timed perfectly with the COVID waves. What a coincidence, they planned it perfectly, didn't they? The massive increase in rates of birth happened with a jump in births one year: 1946. This trend happened for a few years. There is no reason to think the number of deaths would statistically result in a corresponding jump in deaths decades later. It would not account for the total 17 percent increase, but might account for enough percentage points that it -- combined with this year's skyrocketing suicides and criminal behavior in nursing homes -- are huge explanatory factors that would bring that 17 percent down enough that it isn't so anomalous. Does not mean Covid "isn't real" but could indicate that classification of it as a pandemic, and shutting down an entire economy, was a political scam. |
tkwasny
User ID: 77839169 United States 05/01/2021 03:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes, suddenly THIS YEAR (not last year) and timed perfectly with the COVID waves. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18673709 What a coincidence, they planned it perfectly, didn't they? Perfectly time to be rid of Trump, stopping the Trump trade with China/China military aggression efforts, the technocracy takeover of the world, all coordinated with pantifa/BLM the media propaganda blitz. All the years of foundation work by academia, media, Hollywood, Democratic party, hidden hand controllers coordinated into a blitzcreek. |
Q333J User ID: 79435361 Canada 05/01/2021 03:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80301970 Germany 05/01/2021 03:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's the link: [link to www.cdc.gov (secure)] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18673709 You have a breakdown of all-cause mortality WEEK BY WEEK Strangely, it is almost identical to the graph of COVID infections. Again: Your "upper bound threshold for excess deaths" is a fixed curve which does not consider the long time dynamics. And again the long-term graph: [link to www.macrotrends.net (secure)] You said before this data would not include covid deaths in 2020, but this makes not much difference. The CDC provides only PROVISIONAL data from 2020: [link to www.cdc.gov (secure)] "In 2020, approximately 3,358,814 deaths† occurred in the United States." "The COVID-19 pandemic caused approximately 375,000 deaths in the United States during 2020." That means even if we belive their forged numbers then covid raises the numbers only by 10%. Now set the 2020 macrotrends point 10% higher. Does this change anything into a pandemic? It is completely irrelevant Check total deaths in 2020 and compare to average of the last 10 years. As you yourself noticed, it's some 500.000 over average. 50 years ago doesn't matter, because mortality has been going down due to advances in science. Mortality from 1978 is irrelevant. You could also say that mortality was much higher in 1900, when there was no antibitics, which would also be true, but it's completely irrelevant to the current pandemic. Only last 10 years are relevant. I tell you what's relecant: A comparison with the Spanish Flu [link to www.healthaffairs.org (secure)] An increasing from 1800 %(!!!) from Sep 1918 to Okt 1918! From 10,373 to 180,787 in ONE MONTH!!! That's a real pandemic! And you cry because of 10%? Really? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18673709 Poland 05/01/2021 03:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77996452 What exactly does 'excess mortality' mean? Death numbers SHOULD be going up at this time, with a 78 year average life expectancy and considering the world wide crash and then the huge boom in the 40's. Omg, what a brilliant point!!! The demographics alone would have given us higher deaths this year with an expectation of it rising over the next three or four years based solely on the fact that those born at the height of the pist-war boom (1946-1952) are now reaching the statistical probability of death. Freaking brilliant! We would see a natural jump right now if only due to this fact of demographics! If this is fraud they timed it perfectly to obfuscate this demographic reality. Thank you for adding a new dimension to this for me. Yes, suddenly THIS YEAR (not last year) and timed perfectly with the COVID waves. What a coincidence, they planned it perfectly, didn't they? The massive increase in rates of birth happened with a jump in births one year: 1946. This trend happened for a few years. There is no reason to think the number of deaths would statistically result in a corresponding jump in deaths decades later. It would not account for the total 17 percent increase, but might account for enough percentage points that it -- combined with this year's skyrocketing suicides and criminal behavior in nursing homes -- are huge explanatory factors that would bring that 17 percent down enough that it isn't so anomalous. Does not mean Covid "isn't real" but could indicate that classification of it as a pandemic, and shutting down an entire economy, was a political scam. OK, there is really no point in talking to you. You either: - didn't bother to check the link or - don't understand maths and statistics at the most basic level None of what you say makes sense, as the deaths match the pandemic not only year by year but WEEK BY WEEK. If you believe some more births in 1946 could result in such a sudden increase in deaths in synchronicity with COVID infections on a weekly basis, then our discussion doesn't make sense. Or you just didn't even bother to look at the graph and are spewing nonsense. Either way Bye |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80301970 Germany 05/01/2021 03:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18673709 Poland 05/01/2021 03:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's the link: [link to www.cdc.gov (secure)] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18673709 You have a breakdown of all-cause mortality WEEK BY WEEK Strangely, it is almost identical to the graph of COVID infections. Again: Your "upper bound threshold for excess deaths" is a fixed curve which does not consider the long time dynamics. And again the long-term graph: [link to www.macrotrends.net (secure)] You said before this data would not include covid deaths in 2020, but this makes not much difference. The CDC provides only PROVISIONAL data from 2020: [link to www.cdc.gov (secure)] "In 2020, approximately 3,358,814 deaths† occurred in the United States." "The COVID-19 pandemic caused approximately 375,000 deaths in the United States during 2020." That means even if we belive their forged numbers then covid raises the numbers only by 10%. Now set the 2020 macrotrends point 10% higher. Does this change anything into a pandemic? It is completely irrelevant Check total deaths in 2020 and compare to average of the last 10 years. As you yourself noticed, it's some 500.000 over average. 50 years ago doesn't matter, because mortality has been going down due to advances in science. Mortality from 1978 is irrelevant. You could also say that mortality was much higher in 1900, when there was no antibitics, which would also be true, but it's completely irrelevant to the current pandemic. Only last 10 years are relevant. I tell you what's relecant: A comparison with the Spanish Flu [link to www.healthaffairs.org (secure)] An increasing from 1800 %(!!!) from Sep 1918 to Okt 1918! From 10,373 to 180,787 in ONE MONTH!!! That's a real pandemic! And you cry because of 10%? Really? Also in 1918, when there was no antibiotics: - 50% of children died before reaching adulthood. - 1 in every 50 births ended in the death of the mother - 30% of adult population in European cities died of Tuberculosis - Average life expectancy was 55 Yes, I do care. The fact that back in the day people had it worse is not an argument |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79565454 United States 05/01/2021 03:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79565454 Omg, what a brilliant point!!! The demographics alone would have given us higher deaths this year with an expectation of it rising over the next three or four years based solely on the fact that those born at the height of the pist-war boom (1946-1952) are now reaching the statistical probability of death. Freaking brilliant! We would see a natural jump right now if only due to this fact of demographics! If this is fraud they timed it perfectly to obfuscate this demographic reality. Thank you for adding a new dimension to this for me. Yes, suddenly THIS YEAR (not last year) and timed perfectly with the COVID waves. What a coincidence, they planned it perfectly, didn't they? The massive increase in rates of birth happened with a jump in births one year: 1946. This trend happened for a few years. There is no reason to think the number of deaths would statistically result in a corresponding jump in deaths decades later. It would not account for the total 17 percent increase, but might account for enough percentage points that it -- combined with this year's skyrocketing suicides and criminal behavior in nursing homes -- are huge explanatory factors that would bring that 17 percent down enough that it isn't so anomalous. Does not mean Covid "isn't real" but could indicate that classification of it as a pandemic, and shutting down an entire economy, was a political scam. OK, there is really no point in talking to you. You either: - didn't bother to check the link or - don't understand maths and statistics at the most basic level None of what you say makes sense, as the deaths match the pandemic not only year by year but WEEK BY WEEK. If you believe some more births in 1946 could result in such a sudden increase in deaths in synchronicity with COVID infections on a weekly basis, then our discussion doesn't make sense. Or you just didn't even bother to look at the graph and are spewing nonsense. Either way Bye Actually, you can't read. I suggested this as ONE mitigating factor that could account for a statistically relevant addition to already existing real numbers. You are pathetic in your rudeness. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18673709 Poland 05/01/2021 04:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18673709 Yes, suddenly THIS YEAR (not last year) and timed perfectly with the COVID waves. What a coincidence, they planned it perfectly, didn't they? The massive increase in rates of birth happened with a jump in births one year: 1946. This trend happened for a few years. There is no reason to think the number of deaths would statistically result in a corresponding jump in deaths decades later. It would not account for the total 17 percent increase, but might account for enough percentage points that it -- combined with this year's skyrocketing suicides and criminal behavior in nursing homes -- are huge explanatory factors that would bring that 17 percent down enough that it isn't so anomalous. Does not mean Covid "isn't real" but could indicate that classification of it as a pandemic, and shutting down an entire economy, was a political scam. OK, there is really no point in talking to you. You either: - didn't bother to check the link or - don't understand maths and statistics at the most basic level None of what you say makes sense, as the deaths match the pandemic not only year by year but WEEK BY WEEK. If you believe some more births in 1946 could result in such a sudden increase in deaths in synchronicity with COVID infections on a weekly basis, then our discussion doesn't make sense. Or you just didn't even bother to look at the graph and are spewing nonsense. Either way Bye Actually, you can't read. I suggested this as ONE mitigating factor that could account for a statistically relevant addition to already existing real numbers. You are pathetic in your rudeness. No, it's statistically completely irrelevant. If you bothered to check the links you would know that. I'm not rude, I'm just cutting through stupidity. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80301970 Germany 05/01/2021 04:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
TheDarknessComes
User ID: 79658374 United States 05/01/2021 04:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don’t see how any person can look at what’s happening in India right this very minute and not think that COVID is a real problem. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1397910 Do leftists gin up the nature of the threat? Of course they do. Do right-wingers downplay the nature of the threat? Of course they do. It’s a shame everything about this has become as politicized as it is. When you look at COVID realistically, you see a very real disease that has a mortality rate probably the same as or even less than the season flu, but which is considerably more contagious. The extremist bullshit interpretations of it on EACH SIDE are starting to get real fucking old. Quit participating in it. I wonder if the ppl who deny it realize they're doing Chinese commie propaganda for FREE. Chicoms would LOVE for COVID to disappear. It's a stain on their reputation. China still claims only 4,000 died of it, blatant lie. China pays their "50 cent army" to deny and downplay COVID, yet some Americans do the shit for free. At least get paid for it, ppl! Last Edited by TheDarknessComes on 05/01/2021 04:19 PM 70% success rate in magick |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15616837 United States 05/01/2021 06:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79565454 The massive increase in rates of birth happened with a jump in births one year: 1946. This trend happened for a few years. There is no reason to think the number of deaths would statistically result in a corresponding jump in deaths decades later. It would not account for the total 17 percent increase, but might account for enough percentage points that it -- combined with this year's skyrocketing suicides and criminal behavior in nursing homes -- are huge explanatory factors that would bring that 17 percent down enough that it isn't so anomalous. Does not mean Covid "isn't real" but could indicate that classification of it as a pandemic, and shutting down an entire economy, was a political scam. OK, there is really no point in talking to you. You either: - didn't bother to check the link or - don't understand maths and statistics at the most basic level None of what you say makes sense, as the deaths match the pandemic not only year by year but WEEK BY WEEK. If you believe some more births in 1946 could result in such a sudden increase in deaths in synchronicity with COVID infections on a weekly basis, then our discussion doesn't make sense. Or you just didn't even bother to look at the graph and are spewing nonsense. Either way Bye Actually, you can't read. I suggested this as ONE mitigating factor that could account for a statistically relevant addition to already existing real numbers. You are pathetic in your rudeness. No, it's statistically completely irrelevant. If you bothered to check the links you would know that. I'm not rude, I'm just cutting through stupidity. Ad hominem attack is what people do when they either feel they have no response or don't have the intellect to continue a discussion. It is also the primary method of behavior for propagandists |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79149163 Canada 05/01/2021 06:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don’t see how any person can look at what’s happening in India right this very minute and not think that COVID is a real problem. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1397910 Do leftists gin up the nature of the threat? Of course they do. Do right-wingers downplay the nature of the threat? Of course they do. It’s a shame everything about this has become as politicized as it is. When you look at COVID realistically, you see a very real disease that has a mortality rate probably the same as or even less than the season flu, but which is considerably more contagious. The extremist bullshit interpretations of it on EACH SIDE are starting to get real fucking old. Quit participating in it. I wonder if the ppl who deny it realize they're doing Chinese commie propaganda for FREE. Chicoms would LOVE for COVID to disappear. It's a stain on their reputation. China still claims only 4,000 died of it, blatant lie. China pays their "50 cent army" to deny and downplay COVID, yet some Americans do the shit for free. At least get paid for it, ppl! People are seeking Truth period. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50041985 France 05/02/2021 01:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don’t see how any person can look at what’s happening in India right this very minute and not think that COVID is a real problem. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1397910 Do leftists gin up the nature of the threat? Of course they do. Do right-wingers downplay the nature of the threat? Of course they do. It’s a shame everything about this has become as politicized as it is. When you look at COVID realistically, you see a very real disease that has a mortality rate probably the same as or even less than the season flu, but which is considerably more contagious. The extremist bullshit interpretations of it on EACH SIDE are starting to get real fucking old. Quit participating in it. I wonder if the ppl who deny it realize they're doing Chinese commie propaganda for FREE. Chicoms would LOVE for COVID to disappear. It's a stain on their reputation. China still claims only 4,000 died of it, blatant lie. China pays their "50 cent army" to deny and downplay COVID, yet some Americans do the shit for free. At least get paid for it, ppl! People are seeking Truth period. many actively supressing it actually |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78817722 United States 05/03/2021 12:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78808921 United States 05/06/2021 01:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |