Government Genocide Act 1969 - just been updated 8th may 2021 | |
Little Lost
(OP) User ID: 78418350 United Kingdom 05/11/2021 12:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76535232 Germany 05/11/2021 12:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not sure what to make of this. Cant seem to find any details online but somethings changed. Thoughts anyone? Quoting: Little Lost [link to www.legislation.gov.uk (secure)] [imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)] pitiful attempt to retroactively excuse their genocide. Just more evidence of their guilt. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80345947 United States 05/11/2021 12:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76535232 Germany 05/11/2021 12:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Little Lost
(OP) User ID: 78418350 United Kingdom 05/11/2021 12:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Struggling to find details of the changes. Can see somethings occured but what changes??? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79623367 United Kingdom 05/11/2021 12:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79623367 United Kingdom 05/11/2021 01:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | International Criminal Court Act 2001 Legal capacity, privileges and immunities "shall have such privileges and immunities as, in the opinion of Her Majesty, are or will be required for giving effect to the ICC Statute or any related agreement to which the United Kingdom, or Her Majesty’s government in the United Kingdom, is or will be a party."? [link to www.legislation.gov.uk (secure)] |
Little Lost
(OP) User ID: 78418350 United Kingdom 05/11/2021 01:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | International Criminal Court Act 2001 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79623367 Legal capacity, privileges and immunities "shall have such privileges and immunities as, in the opinion of Her Majesty, are or will be required for giving effect to the ICC Statute or any related agreement to which the United Kingdom, or Her Majesty’s government in the United Kingdom, is or will be a party."? [link to www.legislation.gov.uk (secure)] Was this the update? If it is, its carefully worded. What does this translate to? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80004181 Thailand 05/11/2021 01:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | International Criminal Court Act 2001 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79623367 Legal capacity, privileges and immunities "shall have such privileges and immunities as, in the opinion of Her Majesty, are or will be required for giving effect to the ICC Statute or any related agreement to which the United Kingdom, or Her Majesty’s government in the United Kingdom, is or will be a party."? [link to www.legislation.gov.uk (secure)] Was this the update? If it is, its carefully worded. What does this translate to? Like most of the legalize they write, it probably gives them carte blanche to do whatever they please. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76102582 Canada 05/11/2021 01:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Little Lost
(OP) User ID: 78234321 United Kingdom 05/11/2021 01:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Curious why they felt the need to change it. It says alot that they feel these current covid circumstances justify the need to amend the genocide act? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80340960 United States 05/11/2021 02:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Drop of Sunshine User ID: 77833063 Canada 05/11/2021 03:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | International Criminal Court Act 2001 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79623367 Legal capacity, privileges and immunities "shall have such privileges and immunities as, in the opinion of Her Majesty, are or will be required for giving effect to the ICC Statute or any related agreement to which the United Kingdom, or Her Majesty’s government in the United Kingdom, is or will be a party."? [link to www.legislation.gov.uk (secure)] Tge entire House of Commonsforfeited their seat when they chanted with one voice to Obama. The Queen by Parliamentary Law was obligated to fire their asses, and had a specific time period to act upon the House of Commons treason, otherwise the rulership by Throne was abolished. As it truly stands today, there is no legal Canada, nor Throne. Which is why there are now police border check points crossing all the provinces. But even those are illegal because police powers were all created under the power of[youtube] writ held by the now illegitimate Throne. |
Drop of Sunshine User ID: 77833063 Canada 05/11/2021 03:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | International Criminal Court Act 2001 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79623367 Legal capacity, privileges and immunities "shall have such privileges and immunities as, in the opinion of Her Majesty, are or will be required for giving effect to the ICC Statute or any related agreement to which the United Kingdom, or Her Majesty’s government in the United Kingdom, is or will be a party."? [link to www.legislation.gov.uk (secure)] The entire House of Commons forfeited their elected seat when they chanted with one voice to Obama. The Queen by Parliamentary Law was obligated to fire their asses, and had a specific time period to act upon the House of Commons treason, otherwise the rulership by Throne was abolished. As it truly stands today, there is no legal Canada, nor Throne. Which is why there are now police border check points crossing all the provinces. But even those checkpoints are illegal because police powers were all created under the power of writ held by the now illegitimate and defunct symbolic Throne. |
Sungaze_At_Dawn
User ID: 79835284 Canada 05/11/2021 03:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45289262 United Kingdom 05/11/2021 04:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79996063 Canada 05/11/2021 05:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80273693 Pakistan 05/11/2021 05:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | International Criminal Court Act 2001 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79623367 Legal capacity, privileges and immunities "shall have such privileges and immunities as, in the opinion of Her Majesty, are or will be required for giving effect to the ICC Statute or any related agreement to which the United Kingdom, or Her Majesty’s government in the United Kingdom, is or will be a party."? [link to www.legislation.gov.uk (secure)] ICC is the International Criminal Court. Looks like they are creating exemptions and immunities to protect themselves from a ruling. This goes in line with the military running the US while "Biden" plays puppet. Looks like the good guys are about to pull the plug on the human genocide event. British elite don't want to go to gitmo. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45289262 United Kingdom 05/11/2021 06:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | International Criminal Court Act 2001 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79623367 Legal capacity, privileges and immunities "shall have such privileges and immunities as, in the opinion of Her Majesty, are or will be required for giving effect to the ICC Statute or any related agreement to which the United Kingdom, or Her Majesty’s government in the United Kingdom, is or will be a party."? [link to www.legislation.gov.uk (secure)] ICC is the International Criminal Court. Looks like they are creating exemptions and immunities to protect themselves from a ruling. This goes in line with the military running the US while "Biden" plays puppet. Looks like the good guys are about to pull the plug on the human genocide event. British elite don't want to go to gitmo. The amount of boxes this situation is ticking on the elites 'wish list' of events and situations they want in order to fulfil their plan is staggering. Its happening at a phenomenal rate. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45289262 United Kingdom 05/11/2021 07:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77811278 Canada 05/11/2021 08:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | International Criminal Court Act 2001 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79623367 Legal capacity, privileges and immunities "shall have such privileges and immunities as, in the opinion of Her Majesty, are or will be required for giving effect to the ICC Statute or any related agreement to which the United Kingdom, or Her Majesty’s government in the United Kingdom, is or will be a party."? [link to www.legislation.gov.uk (secure)] Was this the update? If it is, its carefully worded. What does this translate to? They are clearly covering their asses: they are granting themselves new immunities to be used if the ICC charges them (i.e., the UK/government and potentially members) with genocide under the Genocide Act. Only question: what genocide are they concerned about? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77811278 Canada 05/11/2021 08:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here is the actual text with key changes UNDERLINED. Legal capacity, privileges and immunities 1(1)Her Majesty may by Order in Council confer on the ICC the legal capacities of a body corporate. (2)Her Majesty may by Order in Council provide that— (a)the ICC, (b)the judges, the Prosecutor, the Deputy Prosecutors and the Registrar [F1and members of their families who form part of their households,] (c)the Deputy Registrar, the staff of the Office of the Prosecutor and the staff of the Registry, F2. . . (d)counsel, experts, witnesses and other persons involved in proceedings of the ICC, [F3and] [F4(e)persons attending meetings of the Assembly (including persons attending such meetings as observers and persons invited to such meetings),] shall have such privileges and immunities as, in the opinion of Her Majesty, are or will be required for giving effect to the ICC Statute or any related agreement to which the United Kingdom, or Her Majesty’s government in the United Kingdom, is or will be a party. [F5(3)In sub-paragraph (2)(e) “the Assembly” means the Assembly of States Parties to the ICC statute (and includes the subsidiary organs of that Assembly).] So this protects the families of the Judges etc, and also any attendee from States that have ratified the ICC (note that the USA is not among them... [link to asp.icc-cpi.int (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79156508 United States 05/11/2021 08:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Little Lost
(OP) User ID: 45289262 United Kingdom 05/11/2021 10:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50316005 United Kingdom 05/11/2021 10:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
JellyTelly1
User ID: 79658944 Czechia 05/11/2021 10:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77006878 France 05/11/2021 10:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50316005 United Kingdom 05/11/2021 10:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
vEyeSea
User ID: 30003138 United States 05/11/2021 11:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'd like to see a debate on the pros and cons of genocide, I bet most MPs are still undecided. To learn who rules over you, find out who you are not allowed to criticize. When the government is wrong, it's dangerous to be right. The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny is in keeping them ignorant. -Robspierre |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80352126 France 05/11/2021 12:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This was repealed in 2001. Repealed Genocide Act Precludes Indicting UK Government Officers To ICC [link to philosophers-stone.info (secure)] Around three years later, on 01/09/2001, Tony Blair’s New Labour government sponsored the repeal of the Genocide Act 1969, by way of the enactment of the International Criminal Court Act 2001. Whilst the 2001 Act also adopted the definition of genocide in the 1948 Convention, the lack of a provision echoing the intent of Article IV was and remains treacherously conspicuous by its absence. Ten days after the Act came into force, the 9/11 black-op was perpetrated on an unsuspecting public, which was immediately used as a pretext for wars of aggression in Afghanistan and then Iraq. |