OSHA Tells Employers They May Be Liable For 'Any Adverse Reactions' If They Mandate Covid Shots

so what.. Good lucking proving it in a court of law.. That type of case is never from a Covid19 jab. All the Lawyers have to do is nothing. How can anyone prove the Jab causes a heart attack of a stroke> ? Thats right you cant.. Maybe if the victim was under 25 ys old then maybe. Short of that age range is a mute case.

Thank you

Glad to come across this post at the perfect time. I work at a FC for a major online retailer. Heard today they will be requiring us to have the vaxx by the end of June or July. Theyve had several big vaxx events onsite, are offering unpaid time to get them plus $40 per shot. NONSTOP propaganda. Anytime we're signed into anything. On our apps that we check schedules, clock in etc, we literally have to watch pop up ads about everything vaxx related, how safe it is blah blah. I am even required to take a "knet" (online) class teaching me about the vaccine. <insert painful eyeroll here>. Theyve got 6 foot police everywhere. People bugging us all day to take on-site tests. I had a hard time believing they could/would make us participate in a drug trial to stay employed. So we will see. If it is required, I'll have to find another job. I'll be losing the best insurance I've ever had and will ever get, but what good is it if I die or am seriously injured. I also don't want to shed the vaccine anywhere around my kids. I have been more cautious around vaxx test subjects than I have around covid+ ppl.
If I'm totally honest, id love a great reason to leave that place.

Sue the shit out of the bastards.

They are so hot and bothered. I broke it down real simply for a man in my office today. I said look you have all the years of accumulated data, the medical corruption judicial cases, the propaganda, the videos of injured victims, and testimonies from doctors, virologists, chemists so on so forth showing their is clear concern. Not one pro vax will person will look at it, admit its there, or use their intellect or logic to digest and discern it. So if thats the case I will make it crystal clear to a pro vaxer trying to apply force of will, I will fucking kill you if you come near me with a needle. I will do it as a righteous war against you. for no other reason than I dont like you or care for your imposition against me. I will gladly die on that hill, will you defending your position. Ill do it for fun, die doing it, and will do it again in the next life. Pretty much stops the debate instantly.

You're welcome.

I cannot understand how employers or the gov't for that matter think they can force experimental vaccines on people. They're trying to force people to become guinea pigs.

On the government's clinical trials page it has:

Official Title: A PHASE 1/2/3, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLIND, DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, IMMUNOGENICITY, AND EFFICACY OF SARS-COV-2 RNA VACCINE CANDIDATES AGAINST COVID-19 IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS


Actual Study Start Date :April 29, 2020
Estimated Primary Completion Date :October 29, 2021
Estimated Study Completion Date :April 6, 2023

[link to clinicaltrials.gov (secure)]

[link to fromthetrenchesworldreport.com (secure)]





The Occupational Safety and Health Administration is informing employers that it's possible they could be held liable for "any adverse reactions" if they mandate employees take COVID-19 vaccines "as a condition of their employment."

From LifeSite, "Employers may be liable for 'any adverse reaction' from mandated coronavirus shots: OSHA":
OSHA released its new guidance on April 20 under a "Frequently Asked Questions" section of its website having to do with COVID-19 safety compliance.

The question asks whether an employer who mandates employees receive these experimental COVID-19 shots is required to record any adverse events as a result of these injections. Such recording requirements of serious work-related injuries and illness may not only leave an employer vulnerable to worker’s compensation claims, but such incidents could also impact the employer’s safety record.

The question and answer in full:

If I require my employees to take the COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of their employment, are adverse reactions to the vaccine recordable?

If you require your employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment (i.e., for work-related reasons), then any adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine is work-related. The adverse reaction is recordable if it is a new case under 29 CFR 1904.6 and meets one or more of the general recording criteria in 29 CFR 1904.7.

This clarification comes as an increasing number of employers seek to mandate the experimental injections despite possible illegality.


This is just common sense but common sense is in short supply these days.

Good to know and have...thanks OP.

This might be enough to nip that bullshit in the bud.

[link to fromthetrenchesworldreport.com (secure)]





The Occupational Safety and Health Administration is informing employers that it's possible they could be held liable for "any adverse reactions" if they mandate employees take COVID-19 vaccines "as a condition of their employment."

From LifeSite, "Employers may be liable for 'any adverse reaction' from mandated coronavirus shots: OSHA":
OSHA released its new guidance on April 20 under a "Frequently Asked Questions" section of its website having to do with COVID-19 safety compliance.

The question asks whether an employer who mandates employees receive these experimental COVID-19 shots is required to record any adverse events as a result of these injections. Such recording requirements of serious work-related injuries and illness may not only leave an employer vulnerable to worker’s compensation claims, but such incidents could also impact the employer’s safety record.

The question and answer in full:

If I require my employees to take the COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of their employment, are adverse reactions to the vaccine recordable?

If you require your employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment (i.e., for work-related reasons), then any adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine is work-related. The adverse reaction is recordable if it is a new case under 29 CFR 1904.6 and meets one or more of the general recording criteria in 29 CFR 1904.7.

This clarification comes as an increasing number of employers seek to mandate the experimental injections despite possible illegality.


This is just common sense but common sense is in short supply these days.

It doesn't say that


[link to www.osha.gov (secure)]

so what.. Good lucking proving it in a court of law.. That type of case is never from a Covid19 jab. All the Lawyers have to do is nothing. How can anyone prove the Jab causes a heart attack of a stroke> ? Thats right you cant.. Maybe if the victim was under 25 ys old then maybe. Short of that age range is a mute case.

Absolutely

Look for the Xiden administration to nullify that order.

The death shots must flow.

It doesn't say that


[link to www.osha.gov (secure)]

We will hold firearms manufacturers liable for deaths due to their product!!!!

Drug companies??? Are you F-ing kidding me??? Do you know how much money they donated to my election/reelection???