Next Attack against the Unvaxxed; immunocompromised

Stop watching CNN. It's all bullshit.

They have no power over your soverignity.

[link to www.cnn.com (secure)]

I was able to grab the link.

Stopped reading at CNN, gtfo with this msm trash lie, stupid parrots

That’s not the point. Most of the sheep are programmed by the MSM. They’re not going to care whether we read CNN when they force the jab.

They’ll use this to back making it mandatory.

Nothing has changed, healthwise, in the general population since before all this began. Nothing is different about our susceptibility to contagion and disease.

What is different, is that Fauci released a bioweapon on purpose to make money and cull the overpopulated areas like India and China.

What a couple of morans. This is telegraphing what they might try next. That’s like saying you shouldn’t study the enemy and their tactics.

Why screw yourself into a know over something that is bullshit is my point. Stop doing that.

I don’t see the issue with trying to predict what they’re going to pull next.

There are only two choices here.

Take the antidote and be compromised forever.

OR

Avoid people like the plague. Because literally that is what's happening.

Oops, left out Brazil. Also overpopulated.

Im cumfused do I get the bad or nut?

They promote this but then don't tell you that the vax
1. Doesn't stop you from getting CoVid.
2. Doesn't stop you from spreading CoVid.

So..why even get the shot?

Ooops messed up the quoting ^^^

thanks to the OP we know what shit they are spouting.

it's good to know

That is the sell they use for all vaccines and why you need to take them - "to protect others" who cannot take it (or doesn't work on)

have some realer news though:

ELON MUSK EXPOSED




[link to www.bitchute.com (secure)]

It gives a "self righteous" reason for those who really want to take the vax.

Meaning, they are REALLY taking it because they have a fear of death and fear for their own lives), but that excuse allows them to take it "for other reasons" and project that outwardly.

They can then use that on you - "you don't care for others".

fock 'em !

The shills don’t want us discussing it

Not only CNN.

[link to www.newsmax.com (secure)]

So healthy people have to take an experimental poison, to protect people with aids?.. hah. nah, sorry.. your lifestyle chose your condition. your problem not mine.

WTH? Tell those vaxtards to get off their whatever BS immunosupressant meds theyre on then... and that they are the ones spreading covid around, not the healthy unvaxxed. to hell with them. What is the next - make it up as we go along - BS “findings” gonna be?

Oh who could forget NEWSVAX

So let me gets this straight. Another person’s health is now my responsibility and I must risk becoming immunocompromised by taking a novel gene tech jab in order to protect the ...immunocompromised.
Since they want to make another person’s health MY responsibility ...is it all their health needs that I can now control? Do I now have the right to force my neighbours to go to sleep at 10pm because it’s good for their health? Or to force my neighbours children to no longer eat any junk food what so ever?

their so-called attacks are ludicrous.


no one can guilt me into anything.



let the immunocompromised eat a better diet and get the sunlight we all need.

it will protect them against many more things than a so-called virus.

You're right. There are some real morons on this site.

This isn't new information. It's always known that immunosuppressants can render a vaccine useless. Even NSAIDS like ibuprophen can negatively impact the vaccine which is why you're supposed to hold off taking them unless you 'really' need it once you get a reaction (by that time your immune system has already responded).

The answer is obvious, that yes there is some small risk to these people but HERD immunity will protect them for the most part. Just like we don't have a measles epidemic. Measles in fact only spreads in local pockets of heavily unvaccinated, like in New York orthodox community but it *did not* leave that community demonstrating that herd immunity works.

Yes they may try to use this as an argument, this is not a new argument that has been raised. But I don't know that it will have enough critical mass to be a major driver for anything like forced vaccinations. Or at least it *shouldn't*.

Also I beleive that the outcomes for those on immunosuppresent drugs or those who are naturally immune compromised is actually not bad- they would typically have LESS risk of cytokine storm and of clotting/stroke disorders however it's possible the virus could overwelm them in other ways. Overall the existing data does not support that they have bad outcomes in general.