God's investment in paradoxes (acquire if you can, release before you acquire)

Wielded by God, can two paradoxes in conflict actually create energy? Can the conflict between two paradoxes energize space, whereby energy is created by the process of paradoxes competing for relative dominance/probability over one another.

Take this example:

+ Paradox 1: The most likely situation to our human perspective is that something exists and we are somehow real.  The most unlikely thing to our perspective is that there was no first cause for whatever exists.  The paradox is that the most unlikely thing is actually necessary to the most likely thing. 

+ Paradox 2: How can there be order in oneness?  The golden ratio reveals order in oneness (the whole is known by knowing the relationship of the larger to the smaller), but still you can observe the whole (Universe) or the parts (i.e., people), but you cannot observe both together. Either (1) you focus on the parts individually, in which case the whole is just an abstraction or concept, or (2) you focus on the whole as a network, in which case the parts are just a perspective on the whole.  So the paradox is that perception is simultaneously real and unreal. And how scalable is this phenomenon?  Find any two paradoxes that integrate with one another, and observe how the product can be greater than the individual parts.  How much more three, fourteen? 

One of the best paradoxes to share with children is Xeno's: How can you ever travel from A to B when there are an infinite number of points between A and B? 

Grand Paradox:

God is simultaneously all and the nothing. God can use His quality of nothingness to be invincible. Just as the all is in everything to create the probability that we exist, so too the nothing is in everything to create the probability that reality is a grand illusion.  This is why there is an inherent oneness between faith and nothing -- in other words, sometimes faith looks like nothing, and sometimes nothing looks like faith. 

How could possibility create a ripple in nothingness? How could nothing become lopsided? How could a signal emerge within nothingness? What is more primal than a physical thing, spiritual thing, and conceptual thing?

Faith is the only tool small enough (wave length = 0) to interact with nothing. Would nothing and faith interact as paradoxes to create an illusion, to create reality?

The exclusion/indifference to possibility is a possibility itself, perhaps?

The simplest solution may be the greatest truth. This reality is what nothing looks like! Faith is both nothing and everything simultaneously. It seems exponentially unlikely that this reality is what nothing looks like, which is why probability manifests within nothingness. 

Thus, the first cause was nothing, which is faith. 

Even the question of the first "cause" is not primal/fundamental because "cause" is just a description of order in time and space. Order is law. Law is an expression of will. That will can be expressed in many ways (i.e., frequentist is most common to human perception; probabilistic is more primal and allowing of miracles/improbabilities). 

Faith is also a description of something more primal: oneness. Kingdom is an description of oneness. 

Only when God divides Himself within the oneness do we perceive order among the parts/perspectives.  

The division of God is probability (even the word 'messiah' is a wordplay for probability), because the nature of God is unity (oneness, kingdom).  So the result is that anything is possible in God. If we focus only on the face of the things we miss the probability in all.

Faith is a creative force. Remember one possible meaning of the bible's first word brShyTh = "it was in His head".

Light and letters are similar in the ability to divide and create and describe reality.  

Oneness resolves another great paradox... When some of us humans observe ‘cause-and-effect’ laws described in our bible, we take comfort in our assumption by analogy: that the biblical Authority also would not engage in exponential injustice, for fear that it too would suffer reciprocity for its own injustices at the hands of a higher Power similarly constituted with a Universal Logic of cause-and-effect retribution.

Now for the surprising logic – the concept of an exponential forgiveness requirement is also frightening. Why?  Because logically, a law of forgiveness could theoretically be exploited as an ‘exponential loophole’ in the cosmic justice system to avoid exponential amounts of personal accountability for ‘cause-and-effect’.  Ask: why would a truly Divine being ever need forgiveness; for if they do (or even if they wonder if they do), are they truly divine, and have they not already proven that they are capable of wondering whether they are truly divine? And if they are not truly Divine or are wondering so, then perhaps they indeed have the ‘personality’ in them to engage in torture-testing to explore the Unknown.

So, paradoxically, perhaps the most frightening Authority of all is one who claims to reign alone and creates a universal law of forgiveness. This paradox is resolve by faith that God is one. Every language (science, math, English) points to faith as the ultimate language (of God).  Faith is the only language that is self-fulfilling and therefore necessary. As such faith is the self-fulfilling description of the first cause, the only thing that cannot be disproven. Faith points to the first cause. What concepts are also self-fulfilling, paradoxical , and require faith?

For those who already know that 0 and 9 are different manifestations of the same number (i.e. every other number is counted/valued by its relationship to 0 and 9). Can nothing be all without creating a paradox between 0 and 9?Is the concept of faith self-emergent from the exclusive oneness of nothing? To date on earth, I've never seen anyone answer either one of these questions with a logically satisfying response:

(1) What are two paradoxes about 'nothingness' that could theoretically create a 'charge' between them to compete for relative probability?

(2) And what are two paradoxes about 'certainty' that could theoretically create a 'void' as they compete for relative probability?

The context for these questions could be as follows:

In quantum mechanics, light and matter are described probabilistically. It is possible their balance can be defined by two paradoxes competing for relative probability (power):

A. The most unlikely idea to our minds is the absence of a first cause.

B. The most likely idea to our minds is the presence of self (i.e., our experience in this moment is really happening).

Neither idea can be proven with absolute certainty, so each remains in a state of motion toward its extreme. Therefore, we experience a duality of paradox through probability mechanics.

I envision the quantum world as a ‘plasma’ of probability waves, where ‘uncertainty principles’ define the laws of relativity, such that the beginning and end of any given wave is indeterminable from the perspective of another wave. So, only the whole (every component part) of the quantum world can produce the perspective to ‘know itself’, and therefore ‘Oneness’ is a natural desire or trait of waves. By contrast, in our material world, every component part is large enough (at least the width of a photon) to measure (interact with) others to create a constantly relative experience for the individual. This 'focus' at the macro/material world collapses waves and therefore appears to 'compete' with oneness.

I envision that our material world exists like the ‘face’ (outward manifestation) of a torus of existence, and the quantum world is the small core of that torus. Or alternatively, the two worlds are each their own torus, existing holographically as 'mind'.

In regards to The Nothing and The One, imagine if God is the only one who can say "I have no one". In this, God is both paradoxically alone and not alone. God has The Nothing (with all its attendant qualities, such as 'no one'). There is no one like God, and yet The Nothing can be theorized to share qualities with God.

It would be very interesting indeed if God solved the accountability problem (aka the loneliness problem) by the quality of inherent companionship with The Nothing.

The nihilist would counter that a hypothetical 'Nothing' would have no qualities whatsoever to share with God or anyone else. But what if the nihilist was wrong. What if The Nothing is not a thing, but a quality (such as 'emptiness' or 'intangibility') inherent to the hypothetical itself.

This is why The Nothing and God would share the quality of 'belief' or 'faith'. What is belief, if not nothing? It is empty, intangible, elusive. And yet is creative and empowering. Which is it? The tension of the paradox actually creates the energy that we humans call possibility. And this would be the reason we observe the zero is the nine in vortex math.

Imagine we exist as an illusion in the mind of The One, who is simultaneously The Nothing. The paradox creates the illusion energy we call reality. The inherent paradox is superior to the red herring question, 'what is the first cause?'