Subway’s “tuna” sandwiches may not contain any actual tuna, according to recent lab tests

Subway’s “tuna” sandwiches may not contain any actual tuna, according to recent lab tests


YOU HEARD THAT RIGHT.
NO BAD FITTY DOLLAH DATE SMELL!


The New York Times conducted a lab analysis on fast-food chain Subway’s “tuna” sandwiches and wraps, which suggests that none of them contain even a trace of actual tuna.

Almost unbelievably, what Subway is passing off as “tuna” could actually be “a mixture of various concoctions,” according to The Washington Post.

The chain is now being sued for false advertising and the selling of unknown products after scientists determined “no amplifiable tuna DNA was present in the sample.”

Because there were no amplification products able to be obtained from the DNA, the scientists declared that they “cannot identify the species” of whatever it is that Subway is trying to pass off as “tuna.”


The Food and Drug Administration‘s (FDA) “Seafood List” outlines this with more clarity.

There are only two options, the scientists revealed, for why tuna could not be detected in Subway’s sandwich or wrap samples.

“One: It’s so heavily processed that whatever we could pull out, we couldn’t make an identification,” they said.

“Or, we got some and there’s just nothing there that’s tuna.”

Is Subway selling its customers mystery meat?

[link to www.naturalnews.com (secure)]