Any civilization that allows women to have authority over men is on its way out. Period.

Men had their chance for thousands of years and look how they have treated women. 200 years ago, in jolly old England, if a woman with money married, it became the property of her husband. He could then whore around and gamble it away as he pleased with a mistress or two on the side that he supported.

Women were not allowed to go to universities. They were not paid on the same scale as men. There were few jobs and few professions open to women. If they became widowed, then they were at the mercy of their relatives.

Men are physically stronger than women but that is it. In the past men used that brute strength to dominate and control women.

Women need to be able to make their path in this world the same as men. So take your backwards ideas and move to the middle east. Leave us women alone. I am not picking up your stinking clothes or dirty underwear. I am not your maid.

Men contribute far more value to society as a whole, and that's great for conquest, globalization, and the progress of science and technology in a collective.

However, merit is too diverse to be institutionalized successfully, and even in an ethnically uniform society there will be competing bloodlines using corruption to acquire power.

The idea of universal morality ignores the fact that immoral practices can be successful life strategies, and it is not the right of any one culture to impose its strategy on all other related creatures. Nature likes to diversify its portfolio, and for good reason.

Imposing moral conformity within a culture is a different matter. However, this can only ever be superficial, as there will always be subcultures competing and manipulating for their own benefit.

The institutions that allow us to organize and progress society as a whole, that buy in to the illusion of universal morality and pure meritocracy, are the very structures of power that the competing subcultures will seek to monopolize and control. There is no one more prone to brainwashing and manipulation then a man who values himself on his merit to society and its institutions.

The women who values herself with solipsism is less prone to such manipulation. She needs no reason to treasure herself, and therefore feels less compelled to become a slave to institutions of power to acquire regard.

Both ways of thinking are valuable. Without valuing merit, there would be no progress. Without innate value, there is no freedom for adjustment. Nature created a wonderful balance with both women and men, but it is difficult for our language to give credit to the feminine way of thinking. Instead, our culture says women are equal to men in masculine value systems, and this just isn't true.

Cultures that are hyper focused on conquest and globalization accentuate the masculine to the point where they segregate the genders and engage in homo-eroticism and pederasty. We've seen this before in other cultures, ancient Greece, muslim tribes, and some african tribes. Hyper masculine cultures keep women hidden and veiled and focus on social bonds between men, which eventually become homoerotic.

If nature has a plan - which is likely, whether you believe in God or the gradual acquisition of strategy through millennia of evolution - it is likely that these hyper-masculine cultures arise to accelerate global order and cooperation. Now that we have proven we can organize remotely, share information freely, and have open-source institutions, there is a chance that the pendulum will swing the other way - towards becoming less collectivized, and therefore increasing the resilience of humanity through decentralization. This would be a swing towards a feminine way of thinking, devaluing contribution to society as society is acknowledged as corrupt and controlling. Both men and women will participate, just as feminism was a swing towards unified masculinity. Men will still feel compelled to contribute and value their contributions, but without institutions playing gatekeeper. Women will still be compelled to value themselves without reason, but with more stable communities this goodwill will be shared consistently.

Thats my hope for how things are going, anyway.

Excellent thought-provoking post!

This part here you wrote is something I haven't seen others talk much about:

Nature created a wonderful balance with both women and men, but it is difficult for our language to give credit to the feminine way of thinking. Instead, our culture says women are equal to men in masculine value systems, and this just isn't true.

-------------

I always found it odd how in our society's attempt to equalize men and women, they focus on teaching women that they should take on masculine attributes and do away with their feminine ways. This gives the wrong message that if a woman wants to be "successful" she should behave like a man. She should dress like a man, talk like a man, be more aggressive and so on.

Women should not be encouraged or expected to be like men. Men and women do have their own very important roles in society, and to warp all of that just creates lots of problems and unhappiness.

We let them go astray by letting them vote outside the family structure.

Women are far gone. Masculine degenerates who crossdress by wearing pants.

The cosmos doesn't fuck around.

Women are children with a huge in group bias and no concept of accountability.

Children.

They should all be made to wear burkas or beaten to death derp :/

The cosmos doesn't fuck around.

Women are children with a huge in group bias and no concept of accountability.

Children.