You're kind of missing the point there. Women aren't the problem.

Women never hold authority, not even when they are put in a position of authority. Women always follow rules laid down by someone else. A woman in charge simply means someone else is really the one in charge, he is just hiding behind her.

Ask a woman 200 years ago about something, and she would give you her husband's opinion. He was her authority, and she never questioned his judgment.

Ask a "liberated" woman today about something, and she will instead repeat the opinion of other authority figures, like the media and the government. These are now her authority, a surrogate for a husband, and she never questions their judgment.

In other words, the only thing that happened, is that the most powerful men seized more firm control over other men, by putting easily ruled women in mid management positions, thereby denying non-elite men access to the lower rungs on the power ladder. If other men can't climb the ladder, the ruling elites can't be challenged.

"Emancipation of women" = disempowerment of non-elite men, to secure the power of the psychopathic elite.

And that's the reason the psychopathic elite "supports women".